Chapter 3 Attachment - Cultural variations in attachment Flashcards
Research of cultural variations in attachment - Van IJzendoorn & Kroonenberg’s research?
- Compared rates of attachment type in 8 countries.
- More variation within than between countries.
Research of cultural variations in attachment - Other studies of cultural variations?
Simonelli et al - Italian secure attachment rates dropped to 50%, may be due to increased day care.
Jin et al - Korean secure vs insecure attachment rates similar to other studies. But insecure-avoidant similar to Japan, could be due to similar child-rearing styles.
Research of cultural variations in attachment - Conclusions?
- It appears that attachment is innate & universal and secure attachment is the norm.
- However cultural practices affect rates of attachment types.
Evaluation of cultural variations in attachment - Indigenous researchers? S
- e.g. Grossmann et al. (German), reduces bias & miscommunication with pts.
- CP is that this is not true of all cross-cultural studies (e.g. Americans Morelli & Tronick).
Evaluation of cultural variations in attachment - Confounding variables? L
Apparent cultural differences might have been due to sample characteristics or environmental differences (e.g. room size).
Evaluation of cultural variations in attachment - Imposed etic? L
Behaviours in the SS have different meanings in different cultures (e.g. low affection = independence in Germany).
Evaluation of cultural variations in attachment - Competing explanations? (X)
Cross-cultural similarity may be due to innate system or media influences.