Chapter 2 Flashcards
2 ways of understanding personality
- objective methods - researcher has zero influence on results
- subjective methods - relies on researchers interpretation
identity claims
things in someone’s environment that are intended for other people
feeling/emotion regulators
things in someone’s environment that are there to make them feel good
behavioral residues
the leftovers of your bhvrs
experience sampling
immediate sampling of bhvr
infomant reports
asking others involved with the individual about their bhvr (for ppl with disabilities and kids mostly)
what are clinical interviews used for
assess characteristics associated with abnormal bhvr
archival/life outcomes data
examining official documents, journals, social media, etc
projective tests
intended to reveal unconscious motives
5 categories of projective tests
association techniques - word association, Rorschach
construction techniques - draw a person test, TAT
completion techniques - finish a sentence/comic
arrangement/selection of stimuli
expression techniques
physiological measures
autonomic arousal (amygdala and SNS)
5 types of response sets
acquiescence - agreeing w/ everything
reactant - disagree with everything
extreme responding - avoid middle of scale
moderate responding - only respond in the middle
social desirability bias - people lie to present themselves in a “good” way
lie scales
questions that can indicate if people have a strong social desirability bias
what does the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale show
people are showing increased levels of individualism and are falling less prey to social desirability
reliability
producing the same results over time
internal reliability
all items on the scale measure the same thing
test-retest reliability
the same individual will produce similar results over time
parallel-forms reliability
2 measures the have the same measure/form
split-half reliability
make 1 test, divide in 2, administer each half as their own test
construct validity
measuring what’s intended to be measured
content validity
the items in the measure reflect what’s wanted to be measured
face validity
is it obvious what the measure is intending to measure?
convergent validity
the measure is highly correlated with another measure that it should be
divergent validity
the measure is not highly correlated with measures it should not be