Chapter 13 FITB Flashcards
The boundaries between true experiments, quasi experiments, and non- experiments are not sharp; the distinctions are based on the — that the researcher is able to maintain
relative amount of control
— may be performed when a true experiment would be impossible or when the advantages of a — outweigh its disadvantages
Quasi experiments , quasi experiment
The most common quasi-experimental situation is to have — . Such experiments are sometimes uninterpretable, depending on the pattern of results
nonequivalent control groups
Quasi-experimental designs often have less – validity and greater — validity than true experimental designs
internal, external
— designs consider the trend of the data before and after some manipulation in a study with no control group. The ideal situation is to have a stable baseline before the manipulation, followed by an abrupt or gradual change to a new stable level
Interrupted time-series
— designs improve on the validity of an experiment by presenting the treatment more than once. The ideal result is for each pre- sentation of the treatment to produce a change in the same direction, with a reversal of the effect when the treatment is removed
Repeated-treatment
One prominent area of psychology that uses quasi-experimental methods is developmental, where time is a variable and — control groups are used
nonequivalent
— designs study individuals of different ages at the same time but have the problem of —
Cross-sectional, cohort effects
— designs study the same individuals over time but have the problem of —
Longitudinal, secular trends
— designs attempt to get around the problems of longitudinal and cross-sectional designs by combining features of both. The time- lag effect compares subjects who are of a given age at different times
Cross-sequential
— is a set of techniques for evaluating the effectiveness of a social service program
Program evaluation
Some sources of resistance to program evaluation are:
fear that the program will be terminated,
fear of losing control of the program,
and fear that information will be abused or that wrong measures will be used;
belief that evaluation is pointless;
and hopes that are too high
In planning an evaluation, the evaluators should identify the stake-holders, arrange preliminary meetings, decide whether an evaluation should be done, examine the literature, determine the —, and present a written proposal
methodology
— evaluations are aimed at improving a program while it is ongoing;
Formative
— evaluations evaluate the quality of the program, often after it is completed
summative