CH.16: persuasive speaking Flashcards
persuasive speeches
aim to change others by prompting them to think, feel, believe, or act differently
persuasion:
- is transactional
- uses artistic proofs
- is usually incremental
ethos
the perceived personal character of the speaker; tips on p.315
pathos
emotional reasons for attitudes, beliefs, or actions; p.316
logos
rational or logical proof
inductive reasoning
begins with specific examples and uses them to draw a general conclusion
deductive reasoning
begins with a broad claim that listeners accept, followed by a specific claim
toulmin model of reasoning
includes claims, grounds (evidence), warrants (link between grounds and claim), qualifier, and rebuttal; p.317
claim
an assertion
grounds
evidence or data that support the claim
warrant
an explanation of the relevance of the grounds to the claim
qualifier
a word or phrase that limits the scope of your claim
rebuttal
anticipates and addresses reservations that listeners are likely to have about claims
credibility
the perception that a person is informed and trustworthy
initial credibility
the expertise and trustworthiness recognized by listeners before a presentation begins
derived credibility
the expertise and trustworthiness that listeners confer on speakers as a result of how speakers communicate during presentations
terminal credibility
the credibility of a speaker at the end of a presentation
motivated sequence pattern
consists of five steps: attention, need, satisfaction, visualization, and action
inoculation
“immunization” of listeners to opposing ideas and arguments that they may later encounter
identification
recognition of commonalities
fallacy
an error in reasoning
ad hominen arguments
attack the integrity of the person instead of the person’s ideas
post hoc, ergo propter hoc
suggesting or assuming that because event B follows event A, event A caused event B
bandwagon appeal
argues that because most people believe or act a particular way, you should too
slippery slope
claims that once we take the first step, more and more steps will follow until some unacceptable consequence results
hasty generalization
a broad claim based on insufficient evidence
red herring arguments
irrelevant to the topic; an attempt to divert attention from something the speaker can’t or doesn’t want to address
either-or logic
suggesting or assuming that only two options exist
halo effect
tendency to assume that an expert in one area is also an expert in other unrelated areas