Ch. 7 Pt. 2 Flashcards
2 things to do before using extinction to positively influence behavior
1) determine if problem behavior is operant behavior
-not all behavior is operant behavior
2) if problem behavior is operant, identify reinforcer maintaining it
-turn OFF reinforcer that maintains problem behavior
extinction ethics in therapy
unethical to use extinction in isolation
-ethical obligation to prevent side effects (emotional responding, extinction burst) of extinction if one uses extinction
functional analysis of behavior
scientific method used to determine if problem behavior is an operant and identify reinforcer that maintains that operant
-consequences that may be reinforcers are turned ON and OFF, while the effects of these manipulations are recorded
-if problem behavior occurs at higher rate when one of these consequences is arranged, then conclude that consequence functions as a reinforcer
-if no experimenter-controlled consequences function as reinforcers, than either behavior is maintained by a automatic reinforcer, or problem behavior isn’t an operant behavior
automatic reinforcer
consequence that’s produced by response– not provided by someone else– and increases behavior above no-reinforcer baseline
differential reinforcement
procedure in which a previously reinforced behavior is placed on extinction while a second behavior is reinforced
-provides opportunity to teach adaptive behavior that’ll replace the problem behavior
-decreases frequency of extinction bursts and extinction-induced aggression
differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI)
problem behavior is extinguished while a different response– one that cannot be emitted while engaged in problem behavior– is reinforced
differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA)
reinforced response can be any adaptive behavior (need not be topographically incompatible w/ problem behavior)
functional communication training
problematic demands for attention are extinguished while appropriate requests are established and reinforced
differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO)
reinforcement is provided contingent upon abstaining from problem behavior for a specified interval of time while “other behavior” is occurring
differential reinforcement of variability
unique contingency in which responses, or patterns of responses, that have never been emitted or have not been emitted in some time are reinforced
-repetition or recent response topographies are extinguished
differential reinforcement of high-rate behavior (DRH)
low-rate responding put in extinction and high-rate responding is reinforced
differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior (DRL)
responding quickly is extinguished and responding slowly is reinforced
Carr & Durand (1985)
paper on FCT
-identified common situations in which problem behavior occurred
-before functional analysis tech. was well established
-reinforced communication instead of problem behavior
what were participants taught in Carr & Durand (1985)?
communicate needs
Carr & Durand (1985) phases
baseline: reinforced problem behavior
-irrelevant response: gave incorrect reinforcer after irrelevant response
-relevant response: gave correct reinforcer after correct response