Business & Marketing Flashcards
5 key questions to ask yourself about plotting strategy
In the book “Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works” by A.G. Lafley and Roger L. Martin, the authors emphasize the importance of strategy in achieving success. They propose four key questions that an organization or individual should ask themselves when developing a strategic plan. These questions are designed to help clarify the strategic choices and guide decision-making. Here are the four key questions:
What is your winning aspiration?
This question focuses on defining your overall objective or purpose. It involves setting a clear and ambitious goal that drives your strategic choices. Your winning aspiration should be specific, measurable, and achievable, yet challenging enough to inspire and align your organization towards a common purpose.
Where will you play?
This question is about identifying the specific market segments, customer groups, and geographic regions where you choose to compete. It involves understanding your target audience and determining the scope of your business or activities. Decisions regarding the markets you will serve and the ones you will avoid are crucial to defining your strategic direction.
How will you win?
This question delves into the competitive advantage of your organization. It involves understanding how you can deliver unique value to your chosen market or customers. By identifying your key strengths, capabilities, and resources, you can develop a winning proposition that sets you apart from competitors.
What capabilities must be in place?
This question focuses on the internal requirements needed to execute your strategy successfully. It involves assessing the organizational capabilities, processes, and resources that are necessary to achieve your strategic goals. By understanding the essential capabilities, you can prioritize investments and improvements to support your chosen strategic direction.
By answering these four key questions, organizations can create a coherent and effective strategy that aligns their aspirations, market choices, competitive advantage, and internal capabilities. This framework can be applied to various contexts, from businesses to individuals and teams, to improve decision-making and enhance the chances of success.
Playing to Win and competition
Competition is a defining factor: The authors assert that strategy is fundamentally about competing to win in a specific market or industry. It’s not enough to have a good product or service; you must also outperform your competitors to achieve sustained success.
External orientation: The book encourages organizations to have an external orientation and understand the competitive landscape thoroughly. This includes identifying direct and indirect competitors, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses, and anticipating their likely moves.
Playing to win vs. playing not to lose: The book differentiates between these two mindsets. Playing to win means actively shaping your destiny by making bold choices, while playing not to lose implies being overly cautious and defensive. The authors advocate for the former, urging organizations to take calculated risks to achieve their aspirations.
Competitive advantage: The book stresses the importance of having a clear competitive advantage. This means knowing why customers would choose your product or service over others in the market. A sustainable competitive advantage is essential for long-term success.
Focus and choice: Strategy involves making choices about where to compete and where not to. The authors emphasize that trying to be everything to everyone leads to mediocrity. Instead, organizations should focus on their strengths and strategically choose the areas where they can win.
Reacting to competition: The book advises against making decisions solely in reaction to competitors. While being aware of competitors’ actions is crucial, the authors argue that it’s more important to be proactive and shape the market rather than merely responding to others’ moves.
Strategic trade-offs: Strategy often requires making difficult choices and trade-offs. Organizations must decide what activities to prioritize and invest in, as resources are finite. By making these trade-offs, organizations can focus on the most critical areas that drive their success.
Overall, the book emphasizes that competition is not something to be feared but rather an opportunity to excel. By understanding the competitive landscape, having a clear winning aspiration, and developing a unique value proposition, organizations can craft strategies that enable them to outperform their rivals and achieve their long-term objectives.
Michael porters 5 forces of shaping strategy.
Threat of New Entrants: This force evaluates the ease or difficulty for new competitors to enter an industry. If entry barriers are low (e.g., low capital requirements, weak brand loyalty, easy access to distribution channels), the threat of new entrants is high, which can intensify competition and reduce profitability. If entry barriers are high, existing companies may have more control over their market and pricing.
Bargaining Power of Buyers: This force examines the power that customers or buyers have over an industry. If buyers have strong bargaining power (e.g., there are few buyers, they purchase in large quantities, or they have easy access to information), they can exert pressure on companies to lower prices or demand higher quality, which can impact industry profitability.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: This force looks at the power that suppliers have over an industry. If suppliers are concentrated and there are limited alternatives for essential inputs, they can command higher prices or impose unfavorable terms, reducing the profitability of the industry.
Threat of Substitute Products or Services: This force assesses the likelihood of customers switching to alternatives outside of the industry. If there are many substitutes available, it can limit the pricing power of companies within the industry and impact their market share.
Porter’s Five Forces framework helps organizations understand the competitive dynamics in their industry, enabling them to make informed strategic decisions. By analyzing these forces, companies can identify potential risks and opportunities and develop strategies to position themselves effectively in the market.
5 forces analysis
The Five Forces analysis, developed by Michael Porter, is a systematic approach to assessing the competitive forces within an industry. The analysis involves several steps to thoroughly understand the industry’s dynamics and the potential impact on a company’s profitability. Here are the steps involved in conducting a Five Forces analysis:
- Identify the Industry: Begin by clearly defining the industry you want to analyze. The industry should be well-defined, and its boundaries should be clear. For example, if you are analyzing the smartphone industry, specify whether it includes all smartphones or only high-end smartphones.
- Identify the Five Forces: Next, identify the five key forces that will be assessed in the analysis: threat of new entrants, bargaining power of buyers, bargaining power of suppliers, threat of substitute products or services, and the intensity of competitive rivalry.
- Gather Data and Information: Collect relevant data and information for each force. This involves conducting market research, studying industry reports, analyzing financial data, and consulting industry experts. The goal is to have a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence each force.
- Assess the Forces: For each force, evaluate its strength and impact on the industry. Consider factors such as market concentration, industry growth rate, brand loyalty, switching costs, supplier power, buyer power, and availability of substitutes. Determine whether each force is weak or strong and the reasons behind it.
- Analyze the Overall Industry Attractiveness: Based on the assessments of each force, determine the overall attractiveness of the industry. An attractive industry is one where the combined impact of the forces is relatively low, suggesting higher potential profitability. Conversely, an unattractive industry has strong forces that limit profitability.
- Identify Strategic Implications: Finally, use the findings of the Five Forces analysis to identify strategic implications for your company. If the industry is highly competitive and profitability is low, you may need to focus on differentiation or find ways to reduce costs. If the industry is attractive, you might consider expanding your operations or investing further.
It’s important to note that the Five Forces analysis is a valuable tool for understanding the external environment, but it’s just one aspect of the broader strategic analysis. Companies should also consider internal factors, such as strengths and weaknesses, and other external factors, such as macroeconomic trends and regulatory influences, to make well-informed strategic decisions.
Strategy with the 5 forces
Identify Competitive Advantages: Based on the Five Forces analysis, identify your company’s strengths and competitive advantages relative to the industry’s forces. These advantages could be in the form of strong brand loyalty, proprietary technology, access to unique resources, or cost leadership. Understanding your advantages will help you leverage them in your strategy.
Focus on Differentiation: If the competitive rivalry is high and industry profitability is low, consider adopting a differentiation strategy. Look for ways to make your products or services unique and distinct from competitors. This could involve offering superior features, better customer service, or innovative design.
Address Weaknesses: Identify your company’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities highlighted by the Five Forces analysis. Develop plans to address these weaknesses to reduce your company’s exposure to threats and improve your competitive position.
Assess Entry Barriers: If the threat of new entrants is significant, assess the barriers that can deter new competitors from entering the industry. Work on strengthening these barriers, whether they are related to patents, economies of scale, customer switching costs, or brand reputation.
Manage Supplier and Buyer Power: If the bargaining power of suppliers or buyers is high, develop strategies to manage these relationships effectively. For example, you might seek long-term contracts with key suppliers to secure favorable terms or focus on building strong relationships with customers to enhance loyalty.
Address Substitute Products: If there are viable substitutes for your products or services, focus on highlighting your unique value proposition to differentiate yourself from the alternatives. Consider investing in R&D to develop new features or technologies that make your offerings superior to substitutes.
Monitor Industry Changes: Keep a close eye on changes in the industry that could impact the Five Forces over time. Market dynamics can evolve, and it’s crucial to stay agile and adapt your strategy accordingly.
Explore Collaborations and Partnerships: Consider forming strategic partnerships or collaborations that can enhance your position within the industry. These collaborations can help you access new markets, technologies, or resources.
Invest in Innovation: In rapidly changing industries, investing in continuous innovation can be a source of competitive advantage. Explore ways to stay ahead of the curve and maintain a forward-looking approach to your product or service offerings.
Test and Iterate: Implement your strategy, but be prepared to monitor its effectiveness and adjust as needed. Regularly revisit the Five Forces analysis to stay attuned to changes in the industry and adapt your strategy accordingly.
5 Forces Strategy pitfalls
While Porter’s Five Forces framework is a valuable tool for analyzing industry dynamics and shaping strategy, there are some common mistakes that can occur during its application. Being aware of these pitfalls can help you use the framework more effectively. Here are some common mistakes to watch out for:
Focusing solely on the present: One common mistake is to focus solely on the current industry conditions without considering how they might evolve in the future. Markets are dynamic, and conditions can change rapidly, so it’s important to consider potential shifts in the industry landscape.
Overlooking complementary industries: The Five Forces analysis may focus primarily on the immediate industry but could neglect the influence of complementary industries or related markets. Understanding these linkages can provide valuable insights into the overall competitive environment.
Not considering macroeconomic factors: External factors such as economic trends, regulatory changes, or technological advancements can significantly impact industry dynamics. Ignoring these macroeconomic factors can lead to incomplete analysis.
Using outdated information: The Five Forces analysis is only as useful as the data and information used to conduct it. Relying on outdated or inaccurate data can lead to flawed conclusions and ineffective strategies.
Neglecting internal capabilities: While the Five Forces analysis focuses on external factors, it’s important not to overlook a company’s internal capabilities and resources. Understanding your strengths and weaknesses is crucial for crafting a successful strategy.
Ignoring potential disruptions: Disruptive technologies or business models can rapidly change industry dynamics. Failing to consider potential disruptions can leave a company vulnerable to unexpected shifts in the competitive landscape.
Misinterpreting the forces: The framework’s analysis requires careful judgment and interpretation of each force’s impact on the industry. Misinterpreting the forces or assigning incorrect levels of significance to them can lead to misguided strategies.
Using the framework in isolation: The Five Forces analysis is just one tool in a strategic toolkit. Relying on it exclusively without integrating insights from other frameworks or strategic analyses may result in a limited perspective on the overall strategy.
Generalizing across industries: Different industries have unique characteristics, and what works in one industry may not necessarily apply to another. Avoid making broad generalizations based solely on the Five Forces analysis.
Lack of ongoing assessment: Markets and industries evolve over time. A one-time Five Forces analysis may not be sufficient. Regularly reassessing the industry and its forces is essential to stay responsive to changing conditions.
To avoid these mistakes, it’s important to use Porter’s Five Forces framework as part of a comprehensive strategic analysis. Combining it with other strategic models and ongoing monitoring of the industry landscape can lead to more robust and well-informed strategic decisions.
“Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.”
In strategic management, there are two fundamental generic strategy choices, as famously described by Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.” These two strategies are:
Cost Leadership Strategy:
The cost leadership strategy aims to achieve a competitive advantage by being the lowest-cost producer in the industry. Companies following this strategy focus on reducing costs throughout their value chain, including procurement, production, distribution, and marketing. By offering products or services at lower prices than competitors, they attract price-sensitive customers and potentially gain a larger market share.
Key features of a cost leadership strategy:
Efficient production processes and economies of scale
Tight cost control and cost minimization efforts
Standardized products with acceptable quality
Focus on driving down operating expenses
Differentiation Strategy:
The differentiation strategy focuses on creating a unique and distinctive product or service that stands out from competitors in the eyes of customers. Companies following this strategy emphasize product innovation, design, superior quality, customer service, and other attributes that set them apart from rivals. The goal is to build strong brand loyalty and customer preference, allowing the company to charge premium prices.
Key features of a differentiation strategy:
Emphasis on product innovation and R&D
High-quality products with unique features
Strong brand identity and customer loyalty
Ability to charge premium prices
It’s important to note that these two strategies represent opposite ends of the spectrum, and companies can also pursue a “Focused Strategy,” which involves either cost leadership or differentiation but targeted toward a specific niche market or customer segment.
Additionally, in practice, companies may adopt a combination of strategies, known as a “Hybrid Strategy,” to differentiate their products or services while also maintaining a competitive cost position. Striking the right balance between cost leadership and differentiation is a strategic challenge that depends on the specific industry, market conditions, and the company’s capabilities.
Choosing the appropriate strategy is a critical decision for any organization, as it will guide the allocation of resources, marketing efforts, and overall competitive positioning. The selected strategy should align with the company’s strengths, market opportunities, and long-term objectives.
Types of differentiated strategy
Differentiated strategies aim to create a unique and distinctive position in the market by offering products or services that stand out from competitors. Within the realm of differentiation, there are several different types of strategies that companies can employ to set themselves apart. Here are some common types of differentiated strategies:
Product Differentiation:
Companies adopting this strategy focus on creating products with unique features, design, or functionalities that customers perceive as superior to alternatives in the market. Product differentiation often requires a strong emphasis on research and development (R&D) and innovation.
Service Differentiation:
Service differentiation involves providing exceptional customer service or support that exceeds customer expectations. This can include personalized assistance, quick response times, after-sales support, or 24/7 customer helplines.
Brand Differentiation:
This strategy emphasizes building a strong brand identity and image that resonates with customers. A powerful brand can create an emotional connection with consumers and lead to brand loyalty even in the absence of significant product differences.
Channel Differentiation:
Channel differentiation focuses on delivering products or services through unique distribution channels. Companies may create exclusive partnerships or unique retail experiences that provide a competitive advantage.
Experience Differentiation:
Experience differentiation involves creating a unique and memorable customer experience throughout the buying process and product usage. This can be achieved through well-designed physical stores, online interfaces, or other experiential elements.
Quality Differentiation:
This strategy centers on offering superior quality products or services that surpass competitors’ offerings. Customers are willing to pay a premium for higher quality and reliability.
Customization Differentiation:
Customization differentiation allows customers to personalize their products or services based on individual preferences. This strategy appeals to customers seeking tailored solutions.
Innovative Differentiation:
Companies pursuing innovative differentiation continuously introduce new and novel products or services to the market. Being at the forefront of innovation can attract customers seeking cutting-edge solutions.
Environmental or Social Differentiation:
This strategy focuses on promoting environmentally friendly or socially responsible practices. Companies aligning with sustainability initiatives may attract a niche market segment.
Prestige Differentiation:
Prestige differentiation involves positioning products or services as exclusive, luxurious, or high-end. Luxury brands often use this strategy to cater to affluent customers seeking status and exclusivity.
It’s essential for companies to choose a differentiation strategy that aligns with their strengths, target market, and brand positioning. Effective differentiation requires a deep understanding of customer needs and preferences and a commitment to consistently deliver on the promised differentiating factors. Additionally, companies should continuously monitor the competitive landscape and adapt their differentiation strategies to stay relevant in the market.
Trade offs in Business
:
Resource Allocation: Every business has limited resources such as time, money, talent, and technology. Trade-offs help companies decide where to allocate these resources most effectively. By making strategic choices, companies can focus their resources on the most critical areas that align with their strategic priorities, rather than spreading themselves too thin.
Competitive Advantage: Trade-offs are necessary to create a sustainable competitive advantage. A company that tries to be everything to everyone may end up being average in every aspect. However, by making strategic trade-offs and excelling in specific areas, a company can differentiate itself and outperform competitors.
Consistency and Focus: Trade-offs provide clarity and focus in business strategy. They help align the entire organization around a shared vision and direction. A clear focus enables employees to understand their priorities and make decisions that support the overall strategy.
Risk Management: Making strategic trade-offs involves evaluating potential risks and rewards. Companies must weigh the risks associated with each option and make informed decisions that balance potential gains against possible downsides.
Customer Satisfaction: Understanding trade-offs helps in defining the target customer and delivering the right value proposition. By understanding what customers truly value and being willing to sacrifice non-essential features or attributes, a company can better meet customer needs and preferences.
Long-Term Vision: Trade-offs allow companies to make decisions that align with their long-term vision and objectives. Short-term gains may sometimes require sacrificing long-term sustainability, but trade-offs help companies focus on building lasting success.
Avoiding Overextension: Without trade-offs, companies might attempt to enter too many markets or offer too many products, resulting in overextension and inefficiencies. Trade-offs help companies set clear boundaries and focus on core competencies.
Adaptability: Making trade-offs enables companies to adapt to changes in the business environment. By understanding their strengths and weaknesses, they can adjust their strategy to capitalize on opportunities and mitigate threats.
Operational Efficiency: Trade-offs can lead to streamlining processes and operations. By eliminating non-essential activities, companies can improve efficiency and reduce costs.
Decision Making: Trade-offs provide a structured approach to decision-making. When faced with multiple options, companies can evaluate the trade-offs involved and make more informed choices.
Growth Trap
Growth Trap: A situation where aggressive expansion causes financial strain, operational challenges, talent shortage, increased competition, market saturation, and strategic drift, hindering long-term success.
Financial Strain: Rapid growth strains a company’s finances due to increased capital expenditures and reduced cash flow.
Operational Challenges: Expanding too quickly leads to inefficiencies and difficulty in maintaining quality and customer service.
Talent Shortage: Rapid growth makes it challenging to find and retain skilled employees.
Increased Competition: Aggressive expansion attracts more competition in the market.
Market Saturation: Rapid growth may lead to entering markets with limited demand, resulting in diminishing returns.
Strategic Drift: Growth without a clear strategy can lead to a loss of focus and identity.
Lack of Customer Focus: Pursuing growth may cause companies to neglect customer needs and satisfaction.
Increased Risk: Rapid growth exposes companies to higher levels of external and internal risks.
Capital Dependency: Companies may become reliant on external capital to finance rapid growth.
Capital Dependency: Companies experiencing rapid growth may become overly dependent on external sources of capital to finance expansion. This reliance on external funding can create vulnerability during economic downturns or if capital becomes less accessible.
Blue Ocean Strategy
The Blue Ocean Strategy is a business framework introduced by W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne in their book “Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant.” The strategy proposes a systematic approach to create new and uncontested market space, allowing businesses to break away from traditional industry boundaries and competition.
The concept of “red ocean” and “blue ocean” is used to describe different market conditions:
Red Ocean: Represents existing industries where companies compete in a crowded and highly competitive market space. Here, businesses strive to outperform rivals, often resulting in price wars and shrinking profit margins.
Blue Ocean: Represents untapped, uncontested, and innovative market space. In the blue ocean, companies create new demand by offering unique products or services that attract entirely new groups of customers, rather than fighting over existing customers with competitors.
The Blue Ocean Strategy involves two main approaches:
Value Innovation: Instead of choosing between cost leadership and differentiation (as described in Porter’s generic strategies), the Blue Ocean Strategy aims to achieve both simultaneously. This is called value innovation, where a company creates a leap in value for buyers while reducing costs, thereby unlocking new market opportunities.
Six Paths Framework: The strategy provides a systematic framework called the “Six Paths Framework,” which guides companies in exploring new market space through the following paths:
Look across alternative industries
Look across strategic groups within industries
Look across the chain of buyers
Look across complementary products and services
Look across functional or emotional appeal to buyers
Look across time
By using the Six Paths Framework, companies can discover new ways to innovate and break away from the competition, ultimately creating blue oceans of uncontested market space.
First Mover Advantage
The concept of first-mover advantage suggests that the first company to introduce a new product or service often enjoys certain benefits such as:
Brand Recognition: The first mover can establish its brand in the minds of consumers, becoming synonymous with the new category.
Customer Loyalty: Early adopters of the first mover’s product may develop strong brand loyalty, making it challenging for competitors to sway these customers.
Market Share: The first mover may capture a significant share of the market before competitors have a chance to enter.
Learning Curve: Being the first in a market allows the company to gain experience and knowledge, which can lead to efficiencies and cost advantages.
However, as competitors catch up and enter the market, the first-mover advantage can diminish for several reasons:
Imitation: Competitors can quickly observe and learn from the first mover’s successes and failures, enabling them to imitate successful strategies and improve upon shortcomings.
Innovation: Competitors may introduce improved or more advanced versions of the original product, eroding the first mover’s initial technological advantage.
Market Saturation: As more companies enter the market, it becomes saturated, making it challenging for any single player to maintain significant market share.
Changing Customer Preferences: Over time, customer preferences and needs may evolve, and the first mover’s product may become outdated or less appealing.
Resource and Scale: Larger and more established competitors may enter the market later with greater resources and economies of scale, allowing them to quickly gain market share.
To counter the diminishing first-mover advantage, companies can focus on continuous innovation, customer engagement, and building a sustainable competitive advantage beyond being the first to market. Companies that can adapt and stay ahead of competitors will be better positioned to thrive in dynamic and competitive markets over the long term.
Disruptive and incremental innovation are two different approaches to introducing new products, services, or technologies in the market. Let’s use Netflix and Blockbuster as examples to illustrate the difference between these two types of innovation:
Disruptive Innovation:
Disruptive innovation refers to the introduction of a new product or service that fundamentally changes the way an industry operates, often targeting a new or underserved segment of customers. Disruptive innovations tend to be simpler, more convenient, and initially offer lower performance compared to existing solutions. However, over time, they improve rapidly and can eventually outperform traditional offerings.
Netflix: Netflix is a classic example of disruptive innovation. When it first entered the market, it disrupted the video rental industry, which was dominated by Blockbuster. Instead of relying on physical stores and late fees, Netflix offered a subscription-based DVD rental-by-mail service. While the early service had limitations, such as slower delivery times, it was more convenient for customers who didn’t want to visit a store. As technology advanced, Netflix further disrupted the industry by transitioning to online streaming, offering a vast library of content accessible anytime, anywhere.
Incremental Innovation:
Incremental innovation refers to the continuous improvement of existing products or services. It involves making small, incremental changes to enhance performance, add new features, or improve efficiency. Incremental innovations build on existing knowledge and technology and aim to maintain a company’s competitive edge in the market.
Blockbuster: Blockbuster, on the other hand, primarily pursued incremental innovation during its dominance in the video rental industry. While it made some efforts to adapt to the changing market, such as introducing online rental options and late fee elimination, these changes were relatively minor improvements to its existing store-based rental model. Blockbuster’s focus on maintaining the status quo and relying on its physical store model ultimately led to its decline, as it couldn’t keep up with the disruptive force of Netflix’s online streaming and subscription model.
In summary, Netflix’s disruptive innovation fundamentally transformed the video rental industry, offering a more convenient and accessible way for customers to access content. In contrast, Blockbuster’s incremental innovation focused on improving its existing business model without fundamentally changing its value proposition, leaving it vulnerable to disruption. The failure to recognize and respond to disruptive innovation eventually led to Blockbuster’s downfall, while Netflix’s disruptive approach allowed it to become a dominant force in the entertainment industry.
Long Tail Strategy
Traditional vs. Long Tail Markets: Traditional markets focus on a few popular items (head) that generate the majority of sales, while less popular items (tail) receive limited attention. In contrast, the Long Tail strategy capitalizes on the cumulative demand of a large number of niche products or services, collectively appealing to a significant market share.
Digital Distribution: The internet and online platforms make it feasible to offer an extensive and diverse product catalog. Digital distribution eliminates physical constraints, enabling companies to cater to niche interests without the limitations of shelf space.
Unlimited Shelf Space: In the digital realm, there is effectively unlimited shelf space, allowing businesses to carry a vast and diverse inventory without the costs associated with physical storage.
Democratization of Production and Consumption: Digital technologies democratize both production and consumption. Creators and small businesses can reach a global audience without the need for traditional distribution channels, leading to greater diversity in the market.
Tail Economics: While individual niche products may have limited sales individually, the cumulative sales of all niche items in the Long Tail can surpass the sales of popular, blockbuster items. The Long Tail demonstrates the economic potential of catering to niches.
Recommendation Engines and Personalization: Recommendation algorithms and personalization tools enable companies to connect consumers with niche products that match their specific interests and preferences.
End of the Hit-driven Culture: The Long Tail challenges the dominance of the hit-driven culture where a few blockbuster products or artists monopolize the market. Instead, it embraces a more diverse and democratic marketplace.
Long Tail Business Models: Businesses can profit from the Long Tail by employing various business models, such as subscriptions, pay-per-use, and advertising, to capture revenue from a wide range of products and services.
In conclusion, Chris Anderson’s “Long Tail” concept highlights the shift in the digital age toward catering to niche interests and diversifying product offerings. Embracing the Long Tail strategy allows businesses to tap into the potential of niche markets, creating a more democratic and economically viable marketplace.
Analyzing competitions Incumbent
Analyzing Incumbents:
Incumbent companies have been operating in the market for a significant period and may have an established customer base and market share. When analyzing incumbents, the focus is on understanding their:
Market Positioning: Assess how incumbents position themselves in the market, what value propositions they offer, and how they differentiate from competitors.
Strengths and Weaknesses: Identify the strengths that have contributed to their success, such as brand recognition, customer loyalty, economies of scale, and technological advantages. Also, identify their weaknesses that can be exploited or improved upon.
Product and Service Offerings: Analyze their product or service portfolio to understand which offerings are most successful and which may be losing ground.
Pricing Strategies: Investigate their pricing strategies to understand how they compete on price and value.
Distribution Channels: Examine their distribution channels and supply chain efficiency to understand how they reach customers.
Customer Feedback: Analyze customer reviews, feedback, and complaints to identify areas where incumbents excel and where they may be falling short.
Competition analysis - Entrants
Disruptive Potential: Assess whether the entrants bring disruptive innovations or new business models that can challenge incumbents’ market positions.
Resource Capabilities: Evaluate the entrants’ financial resources, human capital, and technology capabilities to determine their potential for sustainable growth.
Differentiation: Identify how the entrants differentiate themselves from incumbents and what unique value propositions they offer.
Market Entry Barriers: Understand the barriers to entry for new competitors, such as regulations, high capital requirements, or network effects that protect incumbents.
Customer Acquisition Strategies: Analyze how entrants plan to acquire customers and whether they have a clear understanding of the target market’s needs and preferences.
Potential Alliances: Investigate whether entrants have formed strategic alliances or partnerships that could bolster their competitive position.
By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of both incumbents and entrants, businesses can develop effective strategies to defend their market position against new competitors and to proactively adapt to market dynamics. Regularly monitoring the competitive landscape allows companies to stay agile and respond quickly to changes in the market.
Horizontal Integration
Horizontal Integration:
Horizontal integration occurs when a company expands its business by acquiring or merging with other companies that operate in the same industry or produce similar products or services. The goal of horizontal integration is to increase market share, eliminate competition, and achieve economies of scale.
Key features of horizontal integration:
Involves companies at the same stage of the production process or offering similar products/services.
Increases the size and market presence of the acquiring company.
Aims to create synergies and cost efficiencies by consolidating operations and eliminating redundancies.
May lead to increased pricing power and reduced competition in the market.
Example: A telecommunications company acquiring a rival telecommunications company to expand its market share and gain a larger customer base.
Vertical Integration
.
Vertical Integration:
Vertical integration occurs when a company expands its business by acquiring or merging with other companies that operate at different stages of the supply chain. The goal of vertical integration is to gain more control over the production process, reduce dependency on suppliers or customers, and capture more value within the supply chain.
Key features of vertical integration:
Involves companies at different stages of the production process, such as suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, or retailers.
Aims to improve operational efficiency, quality control, and coordination between different stages.
Reduces reliance on external partners, which can be beneficial in terms of supply chain disruptions and price fluctuations.
Can lead to cost savings and improved margins.
Example: An automobile manufacturer acquiring a tire manufacturing company to have direct control over the supply of tires for its vehicles.
Specialized Resources
Specialized Resources:
Specialized resources are unique and tailored to specific tasks or functions within a company. These resources are often designed or optimized for a particular purpose and may have limited alternative uses in other areas of the organization.
Characteristics of specialized resources:
Uniqueness: Specialized resources are distinct and not easily replaceable by other resources.
Narrow Application: They are designed or customized for specific tasks or functions.
High Specificity: They may be costly or time-consuming to adapt for other uses.
Competitive Advantage: Specialized resources can provide a competitive advantage because of their uniqueness and effectiveness in their designated roles.
Examples of specialized resources:
Proprietary software developed in-house for a specific application.
Specialized machinery or equipment tailored for a particular manufacturing process.
Expertise and skills of a highly specialized workforce in a niche industry.
Fungable Resources
Fungible Resources:
Fungible resources, on the other hand, are interchangeable and can be used in various roles or functions within a company. These resources can be easily substituted for one another without a significant impact on the overall performance or output.
Characteristics of fungible resources:
Interchangeability: Fungible resources can be used in multiple applications or areas of the organization.
Flexibility: They are adaptable and can be easily repurposed to meet changing needs.
Low Specificity: Fungible resources do not have a unique fit to a particular task or function.
Availability: They are generally more widely available in the market.
Examples of fungible resources:
Generic office supplies like pens, paper, and stationery.
Commodity raw materials used in various manufacturing processes.
Generalist employees with transferable skills that can work in different departments.
Unrelated Diversification
Unrelated diversification refers to a business strategy where a company expands its operations into industries or markets that are not directly related to its current business activities. While unrelated diversification can offer potential benefits, it also comes with several risks and challenges that businesses should consider before pursuing this strategy. Some of the risks of unrelated diversification include:
Lack of Synergies: Unrelated diversification may lead to a lack of synergies between the new businesses and the existing operations. The lack of commonalities can make it challenging to share resources, knowledge, or best practices across the diversified portfolio.
Management Complexity: Managing diverse businesses with different requirements, customer bases, and market dynamics can be complex and require different expertise. This can strain management resources and lead to inefficiencies.
Competitive Disadvantage: Entering unrelated industries may mean competing against established players with more experience and expertise in those markets. This can put the company at a competitive disadvantage and reduce its chances of success.
Strategic Focus: Unrelated diversification can distract a company from its core competencies and core business focus. Lack of strategic focus may result in the neglect of core operations and hinder overall performance.
Financial Risk: Diversifying into unrelated businesses can lead to financial risk, especially if the new ventures require significant capital investment or generate insufficient returns. It can strain the financial resources of the company.
Reputation and Brand Risk: Entering unrelated industries may dilute the company’s brand equity and reputation, especially if the new ventures face challenges or negative publicity.
Limited Expertise: Companies may lack the necessary expertise and understanding of the unrelated industries they enter, leading to mismanagement or strategic errors.
Cultural Misalignment: Different industries may have distinct organizational cultures and practices. Merging unrelated businesses can create cultural clashes and hinder effective integration.
Regulatory and Legal Issues: Diversifying into new industries may expose the company to unfamiliar regulatory environments and legal risks.
Divestment Difficulty: Exiting unrelated businesses can be challenging and costly if the company decides to divest later. The lack of synergies may make it hard to find suitable buyers for the unrelated assets.
While unrelated diversification can create opportunities for growth and risk reduction, it requires careful analysis, due diligence, and a clear understanding of the potential risks and rewards. Companies should carefully evaluate their capabilities, market dynamics, and competitive advantages before embarking on an unrelated diversification strategy.
Elements of First Mover advantage
- Economies of Scale: First movers can achieve lower production costs by securing a larger market share early on.
- Learning Curves: Being the first to enter a market allows companies to gain valuable experience and improve efficiency over time.
- Network Effects: First movers establish larger user bases, leading to increasing value and creating barriers for competitors.
- Brand Loyalty and Reputation: First movers can build strong brands and earn customer loyalty, making it harder for competitors to gain traction.
- Patents and Intellectual Property: First movers can secure exclusive rights to their innovations, protecting them from direct copying by competitors.
- Switching Costs: First movers can create obstacles that make it challenging for customers to switch to alternative offerings, increasing customer retention.
Diminishing First Mover advantage
Learning and Imitation: Later entrants can learn from the experiences of the first mover, avoiding their mistakes and adopting successful strategies. As information about the market and technology becomes more readily available, the learning curve for newcomers shortens, allowing them to close the knowledge gap.
Technological Advancements: Innovation and technological progress are continuous processes. As the market develops, new and improved technologies may emerge, giving later entrants the opportunity to introduce better or more advanced products, eroding the initial advantage of the first mover.
Market Changes: Market dynamics and customer preferences can change over time. The initial product or service offered by the first mover might become outdated or less appealing, providing an opportunity for competitors to introduce offerings that better meet current market demands.
Adaptability: Large or established companies that were the first movers can sometimes become complacent or resistant to change. This lack of adaptability can leave them vulnerable to agile and innovative competitors who can better respond to evolving market needs.
Marketing and Branding: Later entrants can invest in aggressive marketing campaigns to create awareness and build their brand presence quickly, potentially narrowing the brand recognition gap between them and the first mover.
Lower Entry Barriers: As the market matures, entry barriers may decrease, making it easier for competitors to enter and challenge the first mover’s position. This can be due to reduced technological barriers, changes in regulations, or improved access to resources.
While the first mover advantage can provide a head start in a market, businesses must continuously innovate, adapt, and stay ahead of their competition to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage. The key to success lies in leveraging the early benefits and continuously evolving to meet the changing demands of the market and customers.
Forward and Backward Integration
Vertical integration is a business strategy where a company expands its operations by acquiring or merging with other companies along its supply chain. It can be divided into two main types: forward integration and backward integration.
- Forward Integration: Forward integration occurs when a company expands its operations downstream in the supply chain by acquiring or merging with businesses that are closer to the end-users or customers. For example, a manufacturer may forward-integrate by acquiring a distribution company or a retail chain. By doing so, the manufacturer gains more control over the distribution and sales of its products, potentially increasing its market share and reducing dependency on external distribution channels.
- Backward Integration: Backward integration happens when a company expands its operations upstream in the supply chain by acquiring or merging with businesses that are closer to the source of raw materials or components. For instance, a manufacturer may backward-integrate by acquiring a supplier of essential materials or components used in the production process. This allows the manufacturer to secure a steady supply of critical inputs, exercise more control over the quality and cost of raw materials, and potentially reduce reliance on external suppliers.
In both cases, vertical integration aims to improve operational efficiency, reduce costs, enhance supply chain coordination, and gain a competitive advantage. However, vertical integration also carries risks, such as increased complexity, potential for diseconomies of scale, and reduced flexibility. Companies must carefully assess the benefits and drawbacks before implementing a vertical integration strategy.
Mergers and Acquisitions
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) refer to the consolidation of companies through various financial transactions, such as mergers (the joining of two companies to form a new entity) or acquisitions (one company purchasing another). These strategic moves are undertaken for various reasons, including expanding market share, gaining access to new markets or technologies, achieving economies of scale, and increasing overall competitiveness.
Whether mergers and acquisitions are a good idea depends on several factors and should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Here are some potential advantages and drawbacks:
Advantages of M&A:
Market Expansion: M&A can provide companies with access to new markets, customer bases, and distribution channels, facilitating growth and revenue diversification.
Synergies: By combining resources and expertise, companies can achieve synergies, resulting in cost savings, improved operational efficiency, and increased profitability.
Technology and Innovation: M&A can lead to access to innovative technologies and intellectual property, helping companies stay competitive in rapidly evolving industries.
Competitive Advantage: Strategic acquisitions can eliminate competitors or reduce competitive pressures, enhancing the market position of the acquiring company.
Talent and Expertise: M&A can provide access to a pool of skilled employees and management teams, enriching the human capital of the merged entity.
Drawbacks of M&A:
Integration Challenges: Merging two companies with distinct cultures, systems, and processes can be complex and challenging, leading to disruptions and inefficiencies.
Overpayment: Overvaluing the target company can result in the acquiring company paying more than the target’s actual worth, potentially leading to financial strain.
Regulatory and Legal Hurdles: M&A activities often face scrutiny from regulatory authorities, which may result in delays or additional costs to meet compliance requirements.
Cultural Clashes: Merging organizations with incompatible cultures may lead to conflicts, employee dissatisfaction, and retention issues.
Strategic Fit: If the integration is not well-planned or executed, the expected benefits and synergies may not materialize, leading to suboptimal results.
In conclusion, mergers and acquisitions can be beneficial if executed thoughtfully and aligned with a company’s strategic objectives. Careful due diligence, post-merger integration planning, and effective management are crucial for realizing the potential benefits. However, M&A can also carry significant risks, and not all deals may yield the intended results. Companies must conduct thorough evaluations and consider the long-term implications before embarking on such strategic moves.
Lean Startup
The Lean Startup methodology is an approach to building and launching new products or businesses that focuses on continuous experimentation, iterative development, and customer feedback. It was popularized by Eric Ries in his book “The Lean Startup.”
The core principles of the Lean Startup methodology are as follows:
- Build-Measure-Learn: The Lean Startup process starts by creating a minimum viable product (MVP) with the minimum necessary features to test and validate key assumptions about the product or business idea. The product is then launched to a small group of early adopters, and their feedback is measured and analyzed to learn valuable insights.
- Validated Learning: The primary goal of the Lean Startup is to gather data and validate hypotheses about the product’s viability and customer needs. The focus is on learning what works and what doesn’t, rather than solely aiming for immediate success.
- Pivot or Persevere: Based on the feedback and data collected, the Lean Startup encourages entrepreneurs to make informed decisions. If the results indicate that the product idea is not gaining traction or needs improvement, the startup may pivot, which means making a significant change in the product or business model. Alternatively, if the data shows positive validation, the startup should persevere and scale its efforts.
- Build-Measure-Learn Feedback Loop: The Lean Startup methodology follows a continuous feedback loop, where each iteration of the Build-Measure-Learn cycle helps refine the product and better align it with customer needs. This iterative process continues until a successful product-market fit is achieved.
- Innovation Accounting: The Lean Startup advocates the use of metrics and data to measure progress objectively. Innovation accounting helps entrepreneurs track and understand the real impact of their efforts and determine if they are moving towards success.
- Agile Development: The Lean Startup methodology adopts agile development practices to quickly respond to changing market conditions and customer feedback. It emphasizes short development cycles, rapid prototyping, and constant iteration.
By applying the Lean Startup methodology, entrepreneurs can reduce the time and resources spent on ideas that may not work and focus on creating products that better meet customer needs. The approach emphasizes flexibility, adaptability, and a strong customer-centric focus, enabling startups to increase their chances of building successful and sustainable businesses.
Vision and Marketing Strategy
Vision and market strategy are essential components of a company’s overall business approach. They play a critical role in determining how the company positions itself in the market and competes against rivals. Cost and differentiation are two key dimensions along which companies can formulate their market strategies.
- Vision:
Vision refers to the long-term aspirations and direction of a company. It is a clear and inspiring picture of what the company aims to achieve in the future. A well-defined vision guides the company’s strategic decisions, resource allocation, and overall business objectives. It helps align employees, stakeholders, and partners toward a common goal, fostering unity and focus within the organization. - Market Strategy:
Market strategy outlines how a company plans to compete and achieve its objectives in the market. It involves making choices regarding target markets, customer segments, product offerings, pricing, distribution channels, and promotional activities. Companies can adopt different types of market strategies, and two prominent approaches are cost leadership and differentiation.
- Cost Leadership Strategy:
A cost leadership strategy aims to become the low-cost producer in the industry or market segment. The company seeks to offer products or services at lower prices than its competitors while maintaining acceptable quality levels. By minimizing production and operational costs, a company can attract price-sensitive customers and gain a competitive advantage. The goal is to achieve economies of scale, cost efficiencies, and tight cost control to sustain profitability in a price-competitive environment. - Differentiation Strategy:
A differentiation strategy focuses on offering unique and distinctive products or services that set the company apart from competitors. The company strives to create value for customers through product features, design, quality, brand image, customer service, or other attributes that customers perceive as superior. Differentiation allows the company to charge premium prices for its offerings and build strong customer loyalty. The objective is to create a competitive advantage based on perceived uniqueness, making customers willing to pay a premium price for the differentiated products or services.
In summary, a company’s vision provides a guiding beacon for its long-term aspirations, while its market strategy outlines how it plans to compete effectively in the market. The choice between cost leadership and differentiation strategies determines the company’s positioning and value proposition in the eyes of customers. Some companies may focus on a single strategy, while others may adopt a hybrid approach, incorporating elements of both cost and differentiation to gain a competitive edge. Ultimately, the success of the market strategy depends on how well it aligns with the company’s vision, market dynamics, and the needs and preferences of its target customers.
Operation Strategy (As it pertains to marketing strategy)
- Operation strategy supports the company’s broader vision and market strategy by designing and managing operations to drive efficiency and competitiveness.
- Cost Leadership Strategy: Operation strategy focuses on streamlining processes, optimizing the supply chain, and improving productivity to achieve lower production costs.
- Differentiation Strategy: Operation strategy ensures consistent delivery of unique value propositions through high-quality production and effective supply chain management.
- Resource Allocation and Flexibility: Operation strategy allocates resources to support the chosen market strategy and adapts to changes in market conditions or strategic shifts.
- Continuous Improvement: Operation strategy emphasizes learning, data analysis, and iterative improvement to refine operations and maintain competitiveness.
Process improvement
Process improvement methodologies like Six Sigma and Lean Thinking are closely related to operation strategy and can significantly impact a company’s ability to achieve its vision and market strategy. Both Six Sigma and Lean Thinking aim to optimize processes, increase efficiency, reduce waste, and enhance overall performance. Here’s how they relate to the overall business strategy:
- Alignment with Market Strategy:
Both Six Sigma and Lean Thinking are aligned with various market strategies. For example, Six Sigma’s focus on reducing defects and variations in processes can support a company’s commitment to quality and differentiation. On the other hand, Lean Thinking’s emphasis on waste reduction and streamlined processes complements the goals of a cost leadership strategy. - Enhancing Operational Efficiency:
Six Sigma and Lean Thinking both aim to improve operational efficiency by identifying and eliminating process inefficiencies. By streamlining workflows and eliminating non-value-added activities, companies can produce more with fewer resources, thus supporting their market strategy for cost leadership or differentiation. - Customer-Centric Approach:
Both methodologies emphasize understanding customer needs and expectations. Six Sigma’s DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology includes a strong focus on customer requirements and feedback. Lean Thinking also encourages companies to align their processes with customer value and eliminate waste that doesn’t contribute to customer satisfaction. This customer-centric approach helps ensure that process improvements align with the company’s market strategy and enhance customer value. - Data-Driven Decision Making:
Six Sigma and Lean Thinking rely on data and statistical analysis to identify improvement opportunities and measure the impact of changes. By using data to inform decision-making, companies can make strategic adjustments to their operations, supporting their overall market strategy. - Continuous Improvement Culture:
Both Six Sigma and Lean Thinking promote a culture of continuous improvement within the organization. This ongoing pursuit of excellence helps companies adapt to changing market conditions, stay competitive, and maintain alignment with their vision and market strategy. - Integration with Operation Strategy:
Six Sigma and Lean Thinking can be integrated into the operation strategy to achieve specific business goals. Depending on the company’s market strategy, the methodologies can be tailored and applied to address key challenges and opportunities related to cost reduction, quality enhancement, customer satisfaction, and innovation.
In summary, Six Sigma and Lean Thinking are powerful process improvement methodologies that can be strategically aligned with a company’s vision, market strategy, and operation strategy. By using these methodologies, companies can continuously improve their processes, optimize operations, and create a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Make Vs Buy Decision
Sure, here are the pros and cons for each option:
Make (In-House):
Pros:
- Greater control over the production process and quality standards.
- Ability to leverage core competencies and expertise for innovation.
- Ensuring confidentiality and protecting proprietary knowledge.
- Long-term stability and reduced dependency on external suppliers.
Cons:
- Potentially higher costs due to internal resource allocation.
- Limited access to specialized knowledge or skills that external suppliers might have.
- Higher risk and resource commitment for non-core activities.
- Limited scalability and flexibility compared to outsourcing.
Buy (Outsourcing):
Pros:
- Cost efficiency through access to external vendors’ economies of scale.
- Focus on core activities and strategic priorities.
- Scalability and flexibility to quickly adjust production or service capacity.
- Access to specialized expertise and knowledge.
Cons:
- Reduced control over the production process and quality.
- Dependency on external suppliers, leading to potential supply chain disruptions.
- Potential risk of exposing sensitive information to third-party vendors.
- Challenges in finding reliable and suitable external partners.
Types of Manufacturing
Lean Manufacturing: “Ship to stock” is aligned with lean manufacturing principles, which emphasize reducing waste and streamlining processes. By shipping products directly to customers without intermediate storage, companies can eliminate unnecessary inventory holding costs and reduce lead times.
Demand-Driven: This strategy is demand-driven, meaning that products are produced and shipped based on actual customer demand rather than speculative forecasts. It helps companies respond quickly to changing customer needs and market demands.
Inventory Reduction: “Ship to stock” significantly reduces the need for maintaining large inventories. Instead of storing finished products in warehouses, companies can have a more efficient and cost-effective production process with minimal work-in-progress and finished goods inventory.
Just-In-Time (JIT) Delivery: The “ship to stock” strategy is often associated with Just-In-Time (JIT) delivery, where products are manufactured and delivered just in time to meet customer orders. This approach further reduces inventory costs and helps improve supply chain efficiency.
SERVQUAL in service
SERVQUAL is a widely used model for measuring and evaluating the quality of service in various industries. It was developed by A. Parasuraman, Valarie Zeithaml, and Leonard Berry in the 1980s. SERVQUAL assesses service quality based on customers’ perceptions and expectations, providing valuable insights to service providers to improve their offerings.
Key components of SERVQUAL:
-
Service Quality Dimensions: SERVQUAL identifies five dimensions of service quality that customers use to evaluate their service experience:
- Tangibles: Physical facilities, equipment, appearance of personnel, and communication materials.
- Reliability: The ability to provide the service accurately, consistently, and as promised.
- Responsiveness: Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service.
- Assurance: Knowledge, courtesy, and competence of service providers, instilling trust and confidence in customers.
- Empathy: Caring, individualized attention, and understanding of customers’ needs.
- Perception and Expectation Gap: SERVQUAL measures the gap between customers’ perceptions of the service they received and their expectations of what the service should be. This gap highlights areas where customer expectations are not being met, leading to opportunities for improvement.
- Survey Instrument: SERVQUAL uses a questionnaire-based survey to gather data from customers. The questionnaire consists of two parts: one to measure customers’ perceptions of the service received and another to assess their expectations of the service.
- Scoring and Analysis: By comparing customers’ perceptions and expectations on each dimension, service providers can calculate the gaps and identify areas where improvement is needed. Positive gaps indicate exceeding customer expectations, while negative gaps signify areas that require attention.
- Improvement Strategies: The SERVQUAL results guide service providers in developing improvement strategies to close the gaps and enhance service quality. These strategies can involve process improvements, employee training, and better communication with customers.
- Continuous Assessment: SERVQUAL is a continuous improvement tool, and service providers can periodically administer the survey to track changes in service quality and customer perceptions over time.
SERVQUAL is widely used across various service industries, including healthcare, hospitality, banking, and telecommunications, to evaluate and enhance the quality of service delivery. It provides a structured framework for understanding customer needs, aligning service offerings with expectations, and creating a more satisfying customer experience.
Improving process with Six Sigma
Improving a process using Six Sigma involves a systematic and data-driven approach to identify and eliminate defects, reduce variation, and enhance overall process performance. The goal is to achieve higher efficiency, productivity, and customer satisfaction. Here are the key steps to improving a process using Six Sigma:
- Define: Clearly define the problem or opportunity for improvement. Establish specific goals, objectives, and metrics to measure success. Identify the key stakeholders and gather input from customers to understand their requirements and expectations.
- Measure: Collect relevant data to understand the current state of the process. Use process mapping and data analysis tools to identify areas of inefficiency, bottlenecks, and sources of variation. Quantify the process performance using metrics and performance indicators.
- Analyze: Analyze the data to identify root causes of defects or issues in the process. Use tools like cause-and-effect diagrams (fishbone diagrams), Pareto charts, and regression analysis to determine the factors that contribute most significantly to process variation.
- Improve: Develop and implement solutions to address the root causes identified in the analysis phase. Use creative problem-solving techniques to devise effective solutions. Prioritize improvement opportunities based on their impact on process performance and customer satisfaction.
- Control: Implement control measures to ensure that the improvements are sustained over time. Develop standard operating procedures, establish process controls, and monitor key performance indicators to prevent regression to the old ways of working.
- Verify and Validate: Validate the effectiveness of the improvements through data analysis and customer feedback. Ensure that the process is meeting the defined objectives and customer requirements. If necessary, make further adjustments to achieve the desired results.
- Continuous Improvement: Six Sigma is a continuous improvement methodology. Once the improvements are implemented, continue monitoring the process and gather feedback to identify new opportunities for enhancement.
Throughout the improvement process, Six Sigma practitioners use various tools and techniques, such as DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) or DMADV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Verify) methodologies, statistical analysis, and process capability analysis. The emphasis on data-driven decision-making ensures that improvements are based on evidence rather than assumptions, leading to more effective and sustainable results.
By applying Six Sigma principles and tools, organizations can streamline processes, reduce defects, enhance customer satisfaction, and achieve higher levels of operational efficiency and quality.Pro
Service - Dominated Logic
Service Dominant Logic (SDL) is a marketing theory that emphasizes the co-creation of value through the exchange of services between service providers and customers. It challenges the traditional Goods Dominant Logic (GDL), which views value creation as the exchange of tangible products from producers to consumers. Instead, SDL focuses on how value is co-created through interactions, experiences, and the integration of resources between service providers and customers.
In Service Dominant Logic:
- Value Co-Creation: Value is not solely embedded in the product or service but is co-created through the joint efforts of service providers and customers during the service exchange process.
- Customer-Centric Perspective: The focus shifts from the output (goods or services) to the customer experience and the value that customers derive from the service exchange.
- Integration of Resources: Both service providers and customers contribute resources (knowledge, skills, information, etc.) to create value together.
- Continuous Interaction: The exchange of services is ongoing and evolves over time through continuous interactions and relationships between service providers and customers.
- Value Propositions: Value propositions are tailored to the specific needs and preferences of individual customers, emphasizing the personalized nature of value creation.
Example of Service Dominant Logic:
An example of Service Dominant Logic can be seen in the music streaming industry. In the traditional Goods Dominant Logic, music was sold as tangible products, such as CDs or digital downloads. However, with the rise of streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music, the focus shifted from selling physical copies of music to providing access to a vast library of songs through a service-based model.
In the Service Dominant Logic perspective:
- Value Co-Creation: Customers actively participate in the value co-creation process by selecting, curating, and sharing playlists, discovering new artists, and engaging with the platform.
- Customer-Centric Perspective: The focus is on providing an enjoyable and seamless user experience, allowing customers to access and enjoy music anytime, anywhere.
- Integration of Resources: Music streaming services integrate resources from both service providers (music labels, artists, technology infrastructure) and customers (listening preferences, feedback, and data) to personalize recommendations and enhance the user experience.
- Continuous Interaction: The relationship between the streaming service and its users is ongoing and evolves based on user behavior and feedback, leading to continuous improvements and updates to the platform.
- Value Propositions: Music streaming services offer personalized playlists, algorithm-based recommendations, and user-friendly interfaces that cater to the individual preferences and needs of each customer.
In this example, the shift from a Goods Dominant Logic to a Service Dominant Logic framework transformed the music industry, emphasizing the customer experience, personalized offerings, and the collaborative co-creation of value between the service provider and the customer.
Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP)
Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) is a strategic business process that helps organizations align their sales and operational activities to meet demand, optimize resources, and achieve their business objectives. It facilitates effective communication and coordination between sales, production, finance, and other departments, enabling better decision-making and responsiveness to market changes.
Background on Sales and Operations Planning:
- Origins: S&OP evolved from the integrated business planning concept that emerged in the 1980s. It was initially developed by the American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS) and gained prominence as a management practice to improve supply chain efficiency.
- Focus on Alignment: S&OP addresses the challenge of aligning sales forecasts and production plans with financial and operational constraints. It ensures that supply and demand plans are integrated to avoid excessive inventory, stockouts, or capacity issues.
- Collaborative Process: S&OP requires collaboration among various functional areas, including sales, marketing, production, procurement, and finance. This cross-functional involvement ensures that all stakeholders’ perspectives and insights are considered during the planning process.
- Demand and Supply Balancing: The core objective of S&OP is to balance demand and supply to achieve a smooth production schedule and efficient resource utilization. It aims to prevent excessive inventory buildup or stockouts, leading to optimized costs and customer service levels.
- Short-Term and Long-Term Planning: S&OP typically covers both short-term (monthly or quarterly) and long-term (annual) planning horizons. It allows organizations to align their immediate operational activities with longer-term strategic objectives.
- Scenario Planning: S&OP involves scenario planning to evaluate the impact of different demand scenarios, supply constraints, or market changes. By considering various “what-if” scenarios, companies can develop robust contingency plans and respond effectively to uncertainties.
- Technology Adoption: In recent years, technology has played a crucial role in enabling effective S&OP processes. Advanced planning and forecasting tools, coupled with integrated enterprise systems, help improve data accuracy, visibility, and decision-making speed.
- Executive Involvement: Successful S&OP implementations require active sponsorship and involvement from top-level executives. The leadership’s commitment is essential to drive the necessary changes and ensure cross-functional cooperation.
Benefits of Sales and Operations Planning:
- Improved Customer Service: S&OP helps ensure that products are available to meet customer demand, leading to better customer satisfaction and loyalty.
- Optimized Inventory Levels: By aligning production with demand, companies can reduce excess inventory and associated holding costs.
- Enhanced Resource Utilization: S&OP enables efficient use of resources, including labor, equipment, and materials, leading to cost savings.
- Greater Flexibility: Scenario planning in S&OP allows companies to respond quickly to changes in demand or supply constraints.
- Alignment of Strategic Goals: S&OP helps align operational plans with strategic objectives, improving overall business performance.
Overall, Sales and Operations Planning serves as a critical process to enhance collaboration, streamline operations, and achieve greater supply chain efficiency in today’s dynamic and competitive business environment.
Quantitative analysis
Quantitative forecasting methods rely on historical data and mathematical techniques to make predictions.
To clarify, here’s a brief explanation of each of these quantitative forecasting methods:
- Moving Average: Moving average is a simple time-series forecasting technique that calculates the average of a fixed number of past data points to make predictions about future values. The moving average smooths out short-term fluctuations and highlights underlying trends or patterns in the data. It is particularly useful for stable or slowly changing time series data.
- Exponential Smoothing: Exponential smoothing is another time-series forecasting method that assigns different weights to historical data points, with the most recent data receiving higher weightage. It is based on the assumption that recent data is more relevant in predicting future values. Exponential smoothing is flexible and can adapt to changing trends or seasonality in the data.
- Regression Analysis: Regression analysis is a statistical technique used to model the relationship between a dependent variable (e.g., sales) and one or more independent variables (e.g., time, advertising expenditure, economic indicators). The model estimates the impact of the independent variables on the dependent variable, allowing for prediction and understanding of the relationships between variables.
Regarding qualitative sales forecasting, as mentioned earlier, it involves using subjective judgments, expert opinions, or qualitative insights to make predictions about future sales or market trends. Qualitative methods are often used when historical data is limited, unreliable, or when dealing with new products or emerging trends.
Qualitative sales forecasting methods
Qualitative sales forecasting methods may include:
- Expert Opinion: Seeking insights and predictions from industry experts, key stakeholders, or experienced professionals in the field to make informed forecasts.
- Market Research and Surveys: Conducting surveys or focus groups to gather opinions, preferences, and expectations from customers, suppliers, or other relevant stakeholders.
- Delphi Method: Utilizing a panel of experts who provide their individual forecasts independently, which are then aggregated, reviewed, and iteratively refined until a consensus is reached.
- Scenario Analysis: Exploring various scenarios and potential future outcomes based on different assumptions and conditions to assess their likelihood and impact.
- Historical Analogy: Drawing insights from past events or situations that are similar to the current context to make predictions about future outcomes.
In summary, moving average, exponential smoothing, and regression analysis are quantitative forecasting methods based on historical data and mathematical techniques. On the other hand, qualitative sales forecasting relies on subjective judgments, expert opinions, and qualitative insights to predict future sales or market trends.
Inventory management metrics
Inventory management metrics are key performance indicators (KPIs) used to assess and optimize the efficiency and effectiveness of inventory management practices. These metrics provide valuable insights into inventory levels, turnover, and associated costs. Here are some important inventory management metrics, including holding costs:
- Holding Costs: Holding costs, also known as carrying costs, represent the expenses incurred to store and maintain inventory. It includes costs such as warehousing, insurance, storage, handling, obsolescence, and interest on capital tied up in inventory. Reducing holding costs is essential to improve overall inventory management efficiency.
- Inventory Turnover: Inventory turnover measures how quickly a company sells and replaces its inventory within a specific period. It is calculated as the cost of goods sold (COGS) divided by the average inventory value. A high inventory turnover ratio indicates efficient inventory management, while a low ratio may suggest excess inventory or slow-moving items.
- Stockout Rate: The stockout rate measures the frequency or percentage of times an item is out of stock and unavailable for purchase when customers demand it. Minimizing stockouts is critical to maintain customer satisfaction and avoid lost sales opportunities.
- Order Fulfillment Cycle Time: This metric tracks the time it takes to process and fulfill customer orders from the moment they are received until the products are delivered to the customer. Reducing the order fulfillment cycle time can improve customer service and responsiveness.
- Lead Time: Lead time is the time it takes to replenish inventory once an order is placed. Reducing lead time can help lower holding costs, minimize stockouts, and improve supply chain responsiveness.
- ABC Analysis: ABC analysis categorizes inventory items into three groups based on their value and usage: A items (high-value, high-usage), B items (moderate-value, moderate-usage), and C items (low-value, low-usage). This classification helps in prioritizing inventory management efforts and identifying items that require more attention.
- Service Level: Service level is a measure of the percentage of customer demand that a company can fulfill from available inventory without experiencing stockouts. A high service level ensures customer satisfaction, while a low service level may lead to customer dissatisfaction and lost sales.
- Economic Order Quantity (EOQ): EOQ is the optimal order quantity that minimizes total inventory costs by balancing ordering costs and holding costs. It helps determine the most cost-effective order quantity for replenishing inventory.
- Days Sales of Inventory (DSI): DSI measures the average number of days it takes for a company to sell its entire inventory. It is calculated by dividing the average inventory value by the daily cost of goods sold (COGS). A lower DSI indicates better inventory turnover.
- Dead Stock: Dead stock refers to items in inventory that are obsolete, expired, or no longer sellable. Monitoring dead stock helps identify slow-moving or non-performing items that tie up resources and need disposition.
By regularly monitoring and analyzing these inventory management metrics, businesses can make data-driven decisions to optimize their inventory levels, reduce costs, and improve customer service.
Product proliferation
Product proliferation in inventory refers to offering a wide range of product variations, which can increase complexity, holding costs, and challenges in inventory management. Companies need to balance meeting customer needs while optimizing inventory to avoid stockouts and overstocking.
ABC Stocking
The ABC classification scheme for stocking is a method used to categorize items in inventory based on their value and usage. It divides items into three groups: A items (high-value, high-usage), B items (moderate-value, moderate-usage), and C items (low-value, low-usage). This classification helps prioritize inventory management efforts, with more attention given to A items that contribute significantly to revenue and profitability.
Evolutions of Supply Management
Sure, here’s the evolution of supply management with years added to the key stages:
- Traditional Procurement (Early 20th century): In the early stages, supply management primarily focused on transactional activities such as purchasing goods and services, negotiating contracts, and managing supplier relationships. It was seen as a cost center responsible for sourcing at the lowest price.
- Strategic Sourcing (Mid to late 20th century): As organizations recognized the strategic importance of procurement, the focus shifted to strategic sourcing. This phase involved more sophisticated supplier selection criteria, cost analysis, and supplier development to ensure the acquisition of high-quality goods and services at competitive prices.
- Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) (Late 20th century): The TCO concept emerged to consider the complete cost of a product or service over its entire life cycle, including acquisition, usage, and end-of-life costs. TCO analysis helped organizations make informed decisions beyond initial purchase prices and incorporate long-term value considerations.
- Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) (Late 20th century to early 21st century): SRM gained prominence as a way to foster collaborative and long-term relationships with key suppliers. Organizations began to recognize the importance of strategic partnerships with suppliers to drive innovation, improve product quality, and enhance supply chain resilience.
- Supply Chain Integration (Late 20th century to early 21st century): Supply management expanded beyond the boundaries of individual functions to include the entire supply chain. This integration involved coordinating activities, information sharing, and collaboration with suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors to optimize overall supply chain performance.
- Sustainability and Social Responsibility (Early to mid-21st century): With growing concerns about environmental sustainability and social responsibility, supply management embraced eco-friendly practices, ethical sourcing, and responsible supply chain management. Sustainability criteria became integral to supplier evaluations and selection processes.
- Digital Transformation (Early to mid-21st century): Technological advancements, including the rise of data analytics, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things (IoT), transformed supply management practices. Predictive analytics and real-time data enable organizations to make more informed decisions, optimize inventory levels, and improve supply chain visibility and responsiveness.
- Value Co-Creation and Circular Economy (Mid to late-21st century): Modern supply management embraces value co-creation, where suppliers and buyers collaborate to create innovative solutions and value for end customers. Additionally, the circular economy concept promotes waste reduction, recycling, and the creation of sustainable, closed-loop supply chains.
- Resilience and Risk Management (Early 21st century onwards): Recent disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of supply chain resilience and risk management. Supply management now involves proactive risk assessment and mitigation strategies to address vulnerabilities in the supply chain.
Today, supply management has evolved into a strategic function that integrates with other organizational units to drive innovation, reduce costs, enhance customer value, and ensure the overall success of the business. As the business landscape continues to evolve, supply management will remain at the forefront of adaptability and innovation to meet new challenges and opportunities.
Centralized and decentralized supply management
Centralized and decentralized supply management are two contrasting approaches to organizing and managing the procurement and sourcing activities within an organization. They differ in terms of decision-making authority, control, and coordination of supply chain functions. Here are the definitions of both approaches:
-
Centralized Supply Management:
Centralized supply management refers to a structure where the responsibility and authority for procurement and sourcing decisions are concentrated at a single, central location or department within the organization. In this approach, all purchasing and sourcing decisions, contract negotiations, and supplier relationships are managed by a central procurement team.Characteristics:
- Decision-Making Authority: All major purchasing decisions are made by the central procurement team or a designated group of experts.
- Coordination: There is a high level of coordination and standardization across the entire organization, ensuring consistency in sourcing practices.
- Economies of Scale: Centralization allows for leveraging economies of scale when negotiating with suppliers and consolidating purchasing volumes.
- Data and Information Sharing: Centralized supply management facilitates easy access to data and information, enabling better analysis and strategic planning.Advantages:
- Improved Cost Control: Centralized procurement can lead to better cost control and reduced duplication of efforts.
- Standardization: Centralization enables the implementation of standardized procurement processes and policies.
- Increased Negotiating Power: Concentrating purchasing power can lead to stronger negotiating positions with suppliers.Disadvantages:
- Lack of Local Expertise: Decisions may not always consider local needs or specific requirements of individual business units.
- Communication Challenges: Communication and response times between the central team and local units can sometimes be slower. -
Decentralized Supply Management:
Decentralized supply management involves distributing procurement and sourcing responsibilities across multiple business units, divisions, or locations within the organization. Each unit or department has its own procurement team responsible for making purchasing decisions based on their specific needs and requirements.Characteristics:
- Decision-Making Authority: Purchasing decisions are made independently by various business units or departments.
- Flexibility: Decentralization allows for greater flexibility and responsiveness to local needs and market conditions.
- Local Supplier Relationships: Each business unit may develop its own supplier relationships based on its unique requirements.Advantages:
- Localized Decision Making: Decentralization enables quick decision-making based on local market conditions and specific needs.
- Enhanced Responsiveness: Business units can respond faster to changing demands or supply chain disruptions.
- Tailored Solutions: Decentralized supply management allows for customized solutions to meet diverse requirements.Disadvantages:
- Lack of Standardization: Decentralization may lead to fragmented procurement practices and lack of consistent processes.
- Duplication of Efforts: Multiple units may separately engage with the same suppliers, leading to inefficiencies and higher costs.
The choice between centralized and decentralized supply management depends on the organization’s size, complexity, industry, and strategic goals. Some organizations adopt a hybrid approach, combining elements of both centralized and decentralized structures to balance efficiency and flexibility in their supply chain operations.
Supplier relationship strategies
Supplier relationship strategies are approaches that organizations adopt to foster effective and collaborative relationships with their suppliers. These strategies aim to improve supplier performance, drive innovation, enhance supply chain resilience, and create a competitive advantage. Here are some supplier relationship strategies:
- Strategic Partnerships: Establishing strategic partnerships with key suppliers involves long-term commitment and collaboration. The focus is on creating mutual value through joint planning, shared risk, and innovation initiatives. Strategic partners work closely to align their goals and drive continuous improvement.
- Supplier Segmentation: Supplier segmentation involves categorizing suppliers based on their strategic importance, performance, and potential impact on the organization. Different supplier segments may receive distinct treatment, with higher-value or critical suppliers receiving more attention and resources.
- Supplier Performance Measurement: Implementing robust supplier performance measurement systems helps track and assess supplier performance against predefined metrics. This data-driven approach enables organizations to identify areas for improvement and engage in fact-based discussions with suppliers.
- Supplier Development Programs: Supplier development programs aim to enhance the capabilities and performance of suppliers. These programs may include training, knowledge sharing, and process improvement initiatives to build stronger supplier relationships.
- Open Communication and Collaboration: Encouraging open and transparent communication with suppliers is crucial for building trust and resolving issues proactively. Regular meetings, feedback sessions, and joint problem-solving can strengthen the relationship.
- Supplier Recognition and Incentives: Recognizing and rewarding suppliers for exceptional performance and contributions can reinforce positive behavior and motivate continuous improvement efforts.
- Risk Management and Contingency Planning: Engaging suppliers in risk management and contingency planning discussions helps address potential supply chain disruptions. Collaborative risk assessments and mitigation strategies promote supply chain resilience.
- Innovation and Co-Creation: Encouraging innovation and co-creation with suppliers fosters a culture of continuous improvement. Organizations can involve suppliers in new product development, cost-saving initiatives, and process optimization.
- Supply Chain Sustainability: Integrating sustainability criteria into supplier evaluations promotes ethical sourcing, environmental responsibility, and social impact awareness throughout the supply chain.
- Negotiation and Contractual Flexibility: Negotiating win-win agreements with suppliers that allow for flexibility and adaptability to changing market conditions can strengthen the relationship and support long-term collaboration.
- Early Supplier Involvement: Engaging suppliers early in the product development process can lead to improved product designs, cost efficiencies, and shorter time-to-market.
- Conflict Resolution Mechanisms: Establishing clear conflict resolution mechanisms helps address issues promptly and professionally, minimizing the impact on the relationship.
By adopting these supplier relationship strategies, organizations can cultivate strong, collaborative, and mutually beneficial relationships with their suppliers. Such partnerships contribute to a more agile and competitive supply chain, enabling companies to respond effectively to dynamic market conditions and deliver value to their customers.
Total Cost of Ownership
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a financial concept that assesses the complete cost associated with owning, operating, and maintaining an asset or making a purchase over its entire life cycle. In the context of business, TCO is commonly used in procurement and supply chain management to make informed decisions by considering both the direct and indirect costs associated with a product or service beyond its initial purchase price.
TCO takes into account various cost elements, including:
- Acquisition Cost: The purchase price or cost of acquiring the product or service.
- Operating Costs: The ongoing expenses incurred during the product or service’s usage, such as maintenance, repairs, utilities, and consumables.
- Service and Support Costs: The costs associated with technical support, customer service, and warranty coverage.
- Training and Implementation Costs: The expenses related to employee training, system implementation, and integration with existing processes.
- Disposal or End-of-Life Costs: The costs incurred at the end of the product’s life cycle, including decommissioning, recycling, or disposal.
- Downtime and Opportunity Costs: The potential loss of revenue or productivity due to downtime or inefficiencies associated with the product or service.
The key objective of calculating TCO is to enable organizations to make more informed and comprehensive decisions that consider the long-term implications and financial impact of their investments. Often, a product with a lower initial purchase price may have higher operating or maintenance costs, making it less cost-effective over time.
By analyzing the TCO of various options, organizations can:
- Identify the most cost-effective and value-driven solutions.
- Make better procurement decisions that consider the total cost impact.
- Optimize asset management and life cycle planning.
- Assess the true cost-benefit of investments and projects.
TCO analysis is particularly valuable in complex procurement decisions, such as selecting technology systems, capital equipment, or service providers. It encourages a more holistic and strategic approach to purchasing, helping organizations avoid unexpected costs and improve their financial performance over the long term.
distribution strategies
Distribution strategies, such as intensive distribution and exclusive distribution, are approaches used by companies to determine how they distribute their products to reach customers effectively. These strategies define the level of market coverage and the number of distribution channels used. Here’s a description of each:
-
Intensive Distribution:
Intensive distribution is a distribution strategy in which a company aims to make its product widely available by placing it in as many outlets as possible within a given market. The goal is to saturate the market and ensure easy access for consumers. This strategy is commonly used for fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and everyday products. Manufacturers may use various types of retailers, wholesalers, and e-commerce channels to reach customers in different locations.
Characteristics:
- Broad Market Coverage: The product is available in a wide range of retail stores, supermarkets, convenience stores, and online marketplaces.
- Mass Market Approach: Intensive distribution targets a large customer base to maximize sales and market share.
- Convenience and Accessibility: The emphasis is on making the product easily accessible to consumers, increasing the likelihood of impulse purchases.
Example: Soft drinks and snack brands often adopt intensive distribution to ensure their products are available in numerous retail outlets, gas stations, vending machines, and online platforms.
-
Exclusive Distribution:
Exclusive distribution is a distribution strategy where a manufacturer grants exclusive rights to a limited number of retailers or distributors to sell its products within a specific territory or market segment. This approach is suitable for products with a premium or luxury positioning, complex technical requirements, or limited production quantities. The exclusive arrangement ensures better control over pricing, branding, and customer experience.
Characteristics:
- Limited Market Coverage: The product is available only through a select few exclusive retailers or distributors, creating a sense of exclusivity.
- Controlled Brand Image: By limiting distribution, the manufacturer can maintain strict control over how the product is presented to the target audience.
- Personalized Service: Exclusive distributors may offer specialized services, tailored to the specific needs of the product and its customers.
Example: High-end fashion brands often adopt exclusive distribution by partnering with a select number of luxury department stores or boutiques, creating a premium shopping experience for their customers.
Both intensive and exclusive distribution strategies have their merits depending on the product type, target market, and overall marketing objectives of the company. A balanced and well-defined distribution strategy is essential for effectively reaching customers, optimizing sales, and establishing a strong market presence.
Certainly! In addition to intensive and exclusive distribution, another important distribution strategy is “Selective Distribution.”
-
Selective Distribution:
Selective distribution is a distribution strategy that falls between intensive and exclusive distribution. It involves the careful selection of a limited number of retailers or distributors to sell a product within a specific geographic area or market segment. This approach strikes a balance between market coverage and control over the product’s distribution.
Characteristics:
- Limited Number of Retailers: Manufacturers choose to work with a smaller, carefully chosen group of retailers or distributors.
- Targeted Market Segments: The focus is on reaching specific customer segments or geographic areas with the highest potential for the product’s success.
- Control and Quality: By working with a select group of partners, manufacturers can ensure that their products are sold in an environment that aligns with their brand image and values.
Example: Consumer electronics companies often use selective distribution to work with specific electronics retailers that offer the right combination of brand alignment and customer service. Similarly, high-end cosmetic brands may partner with upscale department stores that cater to their target demographic.
Selective distribution allows manufacturers to maintain a level of control over their product’s distribution while still reaching a substantial portion of the target market. It is particularly beneficial for products with specific customer requirements, those that need expert sales support, or those that require selective exposure to maintain their premium or niche positioning. This strategy helps strike a balance between market reach and maintaining the brand’s exclusivity and image.
Center of Gravity in supply
The center of gravity in supply chain management is the average location of supply chain nodes. It helps optimize facility placement, reducing transportation costs, improving responsiveness, and gaining a competitive advantage. Continuous evaluation is crucial for adapting to market changes and optimizing the distribution network.
Content might be king but distribution is the kingdom .
Content might be king but distribution is the kingdom . Ig distributed first to tech titans to have them post about it on twitter. They taped into pre-existing networks for distribution.
hotmail marketing
Let’s take the example of Hotmail. Hotmail founders did not know how to advertise their service. They were suggested to write “Get your free email at Hotmail.com” at the end of each email sent.
As a result, the brand accumulated tens of millions of users in a few months.
By just a very small act, the product spread like fire. This is what Growth Hacking is.
Small input, huge output.
It’s focusing on who and where your customers are.
Whats is Growth hacking
-> growth hacking is a mindset, not a tactic.
Growth hacking is a fluid process.
Marketing used to be brand-based, but now, it’s metrics-driven.
It’s not about helping a big company grow 1% a year, but a small startup grow 100000% a year.
It is answering the question: “how do you get, maintain, and multiply attention in a scalable and efficient way?”
Why would anyone use that product?
Growth hacking is not about the perfect marketing strategy, but about the perfect product.
Growth hackers test and change their product until they reach fast growth, meaning they adapt the product until it fulfills a specific need for a specific audience.
Take Airbnb.
It started as founders offering a couch + breakfast in their apartment. Then they pivoted towards a networking alternative when hotels were booked for conferences.
Then it became a website for people that wanted to book accommodation, but neither a hotel nor a hostel. Then, they dropped the networking and breakfast part, and turned it into an anything-booking platform. And the growth was explosive.
Airbnb adapted to their market instead of forcing the market to adapt to their service.
Instagram started as a booking social network, then realized users mainly focused on pics and filters, to they pivoted towards that and achieved explosive growth.
In both cases, founders had to look for product-market fit: having the right service for the right audience.
Minimum viable product and iterate based on customer feedback.
The best way to reach it is to start with a minimum viable product and iterate based on customer feedback.
As a marketer, your job is to isolate your customers, figure out their needs, and design a product that will blow their minds. These are marketing competencies and they can’t be ignored.
Your role, as a marketer, is to be the bridge between the customers and how the product is designed.
In the past, authors would write a book for a year, then launch and hope for a big hit. It seldom happened.
Today, authors are bloggers that write blog posts, monitor the ones that will go viral, and expand these into a book.
Evernote and Customer Feedback
They are data-informed. They test before building, so they can create the perfect product.
Evernote didn’t invest any money into marketing before developing the best product.
They did and saw rapid growth. Then they heard companies were unhappy to see their employees using laptops in meetings, so they developed laptop stickers that said “I am taking notes with Evernote”.
> marketing is useless unless you reach product-market fit.
> marketing is useless unless you reach product-market fit.
You need to repeatedly ask these questions:
- Who is this product for?
- Why would they use it?
- What brought them to this product?
- What is holding them back from referring other people to it?
- What’s missing?
- What’s golden?
Who would use that product?
The way you market your product may be different than the way customers learn about it.
Eg: you may have IG ads for your video game, but players play it because a famous YT played it.
Growth hacking is
- Testing
- Marketing
Sometimes, a great product isn’t sufficient. Wikipedia and change.org existed in another version before being invented. The name and the team behind the product were different.
These teams failed because they didn’t pull customers to the product, which Wikipedia and change.org subsequently did.
The growth hacker must find the fans, the people that are dying to use the product, and pull them in.
Uber offered free rides for people going to SXSW conference (tech conference). In the beginning, Uber targeted young tech people, so they went to find them.
If you don’t know who is your audience, you don’t know your industry well enough to even launch a product.
How to Reach Your Audience
- Go to the news site that your target customers read and pitch them your startup. “This is what we do, this is who we are, this is why you should write about us”.
- Upload on social media and content aggregators
- Write a blog
- Use Kickstarter or similar platforms.
- Find your customers one-by-one and invite them to your service for free
The more innovative your product is, the more innovative the way you will reach your customers has to be.
The more innovative your product is, the more innovative the way you will reach your customers has to be.
Eg:
- Be exclusive with waiting lists
- Create fake users to give the illusion of popularity
- Piggyback another service (PayPal with Ebay)
- Launch in a niche, dominate it, then expand
- Host events and drive users to the app
- Bring influential advisors and investors
These are done with a specific purpose, targeting a specific crowd.
Focusing on brands nowadays is a waste of time. Brands will come with users. Your first mission is to build an army of them.
Customer acquisition should be your sole focus.
Turn 1 Into 2 and 2 Into 4 — Going Viral
Why would users share the product?
When VCs ask to make a product go viral, the growth marketer answers: why would anyone share and talk about the product? Is the product worth going viral? Have we done anything to make it so?
Things go viral for a reason. They are whether extraordinary things, or people that do make it viral have a reason to do it (refer a friend and get 10 euros, refer a friend and get free space, etc).
Close The Loop: Retention And Optimization
Why would users keep on using the product? What do users that keep on using the product do?
It’s useless to drive people to your app or website if, in the end, they don’t use it.
At Twitter, they noticed that users that followed 20 people stayed, while users that followed less than 10 did not.
So they figured out a way to make sure that people followed more than 10 users as soon as they signed up.
Facebook noticed that users that added more than X friends after X days were much more likely to stay on the site.
So they designed the product to encourage adding friends.
At Dropbox, users that stayed were those that added at least one file to Dropbox.
Find the Right Metrics
-> find the metric that means users will come back, and force your customers to do the things that people that come back do (force interaction).
Find the right metrics. By right metrics, we mean the ones that actually inform growth. Don’t measure an amusement park’s success with the number of visitors, but with how happy visitors are.
In order to satisfy their users, Airbnb sent a professional photographer to new listings on their website. It cost money, but over the long term, it paid off.
This is exactly what growth hackers do. They grow the business without chasing down their customers.
While finding PMF is great, it doesn’t mean product development is over. You need to continually improve it and make sure your customers remain satisfied.
Fix your pipeline
Make sure:
- Your email system is on point.
- Your notification system is on point.
- Your landing page is on point.
- Your sign-up flow is on point.
- Your UX is on point.
- Etc
When the author signed up for a service then stopped using it, someone from the company called them to ask what was up.
Unscalable, but powerful.
Often, the best acquisition strategy is to focus on customer retention (aka best product + customer service).
Often, the best acquisition strategy is to focus on customer retention (aka best product + customer service).
- You keep your customers and make them happy
- Your customers bring you new people
Often, the best acquisition strategy is to focus on customer retention (aka best product + customer service).
- You keep your customers and make them happy
- Your customers bring you new people
Putting the Lessons into Practice
When Tim Ferriss contacted distributors for his book The 4-Hour Chef, none of them wanted to publish it.
He and the author had 60 days to come up with a marketing strategy. So they treated the book like a startup.
Product Market Fit
Tim tested which part of the book responded the best, and edited the rest. Each was designed for a specific audience.
Growth and Attention
They focused on blogs in the niche of the 4-Hour Chef. Traditional media outlets then spoke about the book.
Virality
They partnered with BitTorrent and gave the community a bundle of interviews and videos to download.
Optimization and retention
They looked at all that they did during the campaign and noted what worked and what didn’t.
PREP
(Story)
PREP
(Story)
Point
Reason
Example
Point
Storytelling
Make the speech about them - Have you ever(Connect it to them)
Dont be a hero of your own story-Don’t brag
Dont lie, but do clean up the story
Use call and response - make the story universal - does this make sense, how many of you get angry while driving.
Sensory Detail - What would they see, hear, smell, and feel
Use mystery to build tension (Maybe start with the conclusion)
Maybe right before close talk about emotion or a point. Stretch out emotion.
Mini Story
Mini story
3-4 sentences, beginning middle end.
close with a rhyme or rhetorical device/lesson/joke.
Presentation
Pros
Cons
Recommendations
The new reality:
The new reality: “Today anyone can be in business”. Rework is a book for anyone, but not for everyone. It’s designed for people wanting to start or running a business, independently of your financial, social, geographical, or professional situation.
Ignore the real world
The real world is a toxic place where dreams are slaughtered by those who are too coward to try. Somebody else’s reality doesn’t have to be yours, so define your own reality with your own existence and ignore the rest.
Learning from mistakes is overrated
Failing for the sake of it is not okay. Iterate over what works: success compounds.
Planning is guessing
Don’t plan, always be improvising. Reality can only be predicted on a short or extremely long term.
Why grow?
Your company size is a vanity metric. Growing increases business complexity, and going leaner down the road is even harder. Stay small as long as it remains sustainable.
Workaholism
Working too much is getting less things done. Always go deep or go out.
Make a dent in the universe
Greatness originates from purpose. Make something that improves someone else’s life with what you already have.
Scratch your own itch
Make something you’d use yourself. Developing a profitable business takes years, you don’t want to spend them doing things you don’t want to do.
Start making something
There is always time to use differently to serve a purpose dear to you. It doesn’t have to be a lot, just spend time wisely and it will eventually compounds.
Draw a line in the sand
Never forget your why. Share your stands openly to attract the right people and make the right choices.
Mission statement impossible:
Always align your acts and objectives with your mission statement. Empty words are worth nothing.
Outside money is Plan Z
Raising money is giving up control and focus. Quality and sustainability should always come first.
