BIOLOGICAL SAFETY IN CLINICAL AND RESEARCH LABORATORIES Flashcards
WOOLSORTERS’ DISEASE
- ONE OF THE EARLIEST RECORDINGS OF OCCUPATIONAL INFECTION (GETTING ILL AT A WORKPLACE)
- CALLED WOOLSORTERS’ DISEASE BECAUSE PEOPLE DEALING WITH SHEEP WOOL GOT IT, NOW KNOWN AS INHALATIONAL ANTHRAX (THEN QUITE COMMON IN SHEEP PARTICULARLY)
LAIs?
Laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs) are defined as all infections acquired through laboratory or laboratory-related activities regardless of whether they are symptomatic or asymptomatic in nature.
- first became prevalent with emergence of microbiology (1890s)
HISTORICALLY, PEOPLE WORKING AT A LAB WERE AT HOW MUCH HIGHER RISK OF ACQUIRING TUBERCULOSIS THAN GENERAL PUBLIC?
8 TIMES
MOUTH PIPETTING IN LABORATORY SETTING?
- RECOGNISED AS A SERIOUS HAZARD AND AN UNSAFE PRACTICE AS FAR BACK AS 1915
- REGARDLESS OF THAT, WIDELY PRACTICE IN 1960s —> 62% OF LABS MOUTH PIPETTED
- FIGURE IMPROVED IN 1977
THE ROBENS REPORT?
- THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK WAS APPOINTED IN 1970
- IT WAS REQUIRED TO REVIEW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RELATION TO THE SAFETY AND HEALTH OF PERSONS AT WORK AND THTA OF THE PUBLIC IN CONNECTION WITH ACTIVITIES ON INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL OR CONSTRUCTION SITES
- THE COMMITTEE WAS CHAIRED BY LORD ALFRED ROBENS (AND COMPRISED OF 6 OTHER MEMBERS)
- THE COMMITTEE REPORTED IN 1972 AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE SUBSTANTIALLY ENACTED IN THE HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, ETC ACT 1974
ADVISORY COMMITTE ON DANGEROUS PATHOGENS
- FORMED AFTER A SMALLPOX INCIDENT (A WOMAN WORKING NEARBY A LAB GOT SMALLPOX AND DIED)
- a UK-wide advisory committee
- It was established in 1981, and the terms of reference were revised in 1991 to allow for a wider remit
The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens’ (ACDP) role is to provide scientific advice on the risks of exposure to various pathogens.
HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK ETC ACT
- 1974 (BUT STILL IN USE TODAY)
- ETC RELATES TO SCENARIOS LIK EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, SHOPS, CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS…
- REPLACED NUMEROUS INDIVIDUAL LEGISLATIONS; FOR THE FIRST TIME THE WHOLE OF HEALTH AND SAFETY LEGISLATION BROUGHT UNDER A SINGLE ACT
- INTRODUCED THE CONCEPT OF RISK ASSESSMENT BEING A FOUNDATION FOR ALL LAB PRACTICES
INDIVIDUAL LEGISLATIONS INTRODUCED AFTER THE HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK ETC ACT (1974) THAT PROVIDE FURTHER/MORE SPECIFIC GUIDANCE?
- COSH: CONTROL OF SUBSTANCES HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH REGULATIONS 2002
- THE GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS (CONTAINED USE) REGULTIONS 2014
- GUIDANCE FOR LICENCE HOLDRES ON CONTAINMENT AND CONTROL OF SPECIFIED ANIMAL PATHOGEN (MOSTLY REFERS TO AGRICULTURALLY IMPORTANT ANIMALS)
FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE 2007 OUTBREAK
- A LOT OF MEMBERW OR RURAL COMMUNITIES STILL SCARED PF THE IMPACT OF THE DISEASE ON AGRICULTURE FROM THE 2001 OUTBREAK
- FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE is an infectious and sometimes fatal viral disease that affects cloven-hoofed animals, including domestic and wild bovids. The virus causes a high fever lasting two to six days, followed by blisters inside the mouth and on the feet that may rupture and cause lameness. FMD has very severe implications for animal farming, since it is highly infectious and can be spread by infected animals comparatively easily through contact with contaminated farming equipment, vehicles, clothing, and feed, and by domestic and wild predators. Its containment demands considerable efforts in vaccination, strict monitoring, trade restrictions, quarantines, and the culling of both infected and healthy (uninfected) animals.
- VIRUS ESCAPED FROM A LAB IN SURREY
EXMPLES OF STRATEGIES USED IN CONTAINMENT LABS TO MINIMISE RISK OF INFECTIONS?
- CONTAINMENT LABS HAVE THE CAPACITY TO BE COMPLETELY SEALED
- CONTROL OF AEROSOLS WITH MSCs (MICROBIOLOGICAL SAFETY CABINETS)
- WASTE INACTIVATION (USE OF HIGH TEMP AND HIGH PRESSURE STEAM
- NEGATIVE PRESSURE (AS THE AIR IN THE LAB IS POSIBLY CONTAMINATED, THE PRESSURE INSIDE THE LAB NEEDS TO BE LOWER THAN ON THE OUTSIDE, SO WHEN THE DOOR OPEN THERE IS AN INFLUX OF AIR RATHER THAN AIR LEAVING THE LAB)
- ABILITY TO FUMIGATE (disinfect or purify (an area) with the fumes of certain chemicals) —> often using Formaldehyde
- EFFLUENT DISINFECTION (Effluent disinfection is the disinfection of the outflowing of water or gas from structures such as wastewater treatment plant, sewer pipe or industrial outfall into a natural body of water)
- SOMETIMES SHOWERS PRESENT FOR LAB WORKERS, SHOWER WATER IS LATER ALSO DISINFECTED
MOST COMMON FUMIGANT IN CONTAINMENT LABS?
Formaldehyde: Powerful enough to be a disinfectant and a preserver of bodies. Highly toxic to all living things. (after use released into the air highly diluted
ALL (PATHOGENIC) BIOLOGICAL AGENTS CAN BE CLASSIFIED INTO ONE OF HOW MANY HAZARD GROUPS? BASED ON WHAT ARE THEY CLASSIFIED?
- 4 HAZARD GROUPS
CLASSIFICATION BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS:
-SEVERITY OF DISEASE - RISK TO WORKERS
- LIKELIHOOD OF COMMUNITY TRANSMISSION
- AVAILABILITY OF VACCINES OR EFFECTIVE TREATMENTS
WHO WAS THE APPROVED LIST OF BIOLOGICAL AGENTS (CLASSIFIED EVERY BIO AGENT INTO ONE OF THE FOUR HAZARD GROUPS) MADE BY?
THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON DANGEROUS PATHOGENS (ACDP)
IF A BIOLOGICAL AGENT IS NOT LISTED ON THE APPROVED LIST OF BIOLOGICAL AGENTS (WHERE CORRESPONDING HAZARD GROUPS ARE INDICATED) WHAT COULD THAT MEANS?
- UNLISTED SOMETIMES RESPONS TO HG1 (BUT THAT SHOULDN’T ALWAYS AUTOMATICALLY BE ASSUMED)
- IF A SPECIES WITHIN GENERA IS NOT LISTED IT MIGHT NOT BE PATHOGENIC
- IT COULD BE AN EMERGING PATHOGN –> NOT ENOUGH INFO
HOW MANY CONTAINMENT LEVEL 4 LABS ARE THERE CURRENTLY IN THE UK?
9
ACDP DEFINITIONS FOR HAZARD GROUPS?
GROUP 1: UNLIKELY TO CAUSE HUMAN DISEASE
GROUP 2: CAN CAUSE HUMAN DISEASE, MAY BE A HAZARD TO EMPLOYEES, UNLIKELY TO SPREAD IN THE COMMUNITY, USUALLY EFFECTIVE PROPHYLAXIS OR TREATMENT AVAILABLE
GROUP 3: CAN CAUSE SEVERE HUMAN DISEASE, MAY BE A SERIOUS HAZARD TO EMPLOYEES, CAN TO SPREAD TO THE COMMUNITY, USUALLY EFFECTIVE PROPHYLAXIS OR TREATMENT AVAILABLE
GROUP 4: CAUSES SEVERE HUMAN DISEASE, A SERIOUS HAZARD TO EMPLOYEES, LIKELY TO SPREAD IN THE COMMUNITY, USUALLY NO EFFECTIVE PROPHYLAXIS OR TREATMENT AVAILABLE
(EACH ONE REQUIRES CORRESPONDING CONTAINMENT LEVEL; SAME NUMBERS, E.G. HAZARD GROUP 1 —> CONTAINMENT LEVEL 1)
MYOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS HAZARD GROUP?
3
E. COLI K12 (LAB STRAIN) & E. COLI GENERALLY & E. COLI O157 STRAIN –> HAZARD GROUPS
LAB STRAIN - HG 1, BECAUSE LAB STRAINS HAVE BEEN DISALED IN SEVERAL WAYS AND ARE MOSTLY USED FOR STUDYING GENETICS
E. COLI GENERALLY - HG2
O157 - HG3 (MOST PREVALENT STRAIN?)
PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM (MALARIA) HAZARD GROUP?
UK: 3
BUT VARIES BASED ON COUNTRY, E.G. US –> 2