ATTACHMENT EVALUATIONS Flashcards

1
Q

CAREGIVER- INFANT
strength 1

A

tronick provided evidence of the ‘still face experiment’
that babies get distressed when mothers did not respond to reciprocity
therefore, infants have active involvement with reciprocity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

CAREGIVER INFANT
strength 2

A

usually conducted in lab
conditions are controlled
high reliability and validity
recordings established for inter rater reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

CAREGIVER INFANT
weakness

A

difficult to interpret babies as they lack co ordination.
cannot determine if behaviour is in response to caregiver
are interactions special

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CAREGIVER INFANT
weakness 2

A

feldman suggests were giving names to pattern observable behaviour.
may not be useful in development
cannot be certain interational synchrony and reciprocity for a childs development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ROLE OF THE FATHER
strength

A

research can be used to give advice to parents
reducing parental anxiety+ justification for paternity leave
real life application and can enhance life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ROLE OF THE FATHER
weakness

A

confusion over what researchers are researching into role of the father. some are SCG and some PCG
makes role of the father difficult as it doesnt specify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ROLE OF THE FATHER
weakness 2

A

research shown babies of single mothers, two mothers have not developed any different to hetrosexual
conflicting evidents
psychologists cannot give definite answer of role of the father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

STAGES OF ATTACHMENT
strength

A

empirical evidence to support
increases validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

STAGES OF ATTACHMENT
strength

A

naturalistic observation
mothers observed day to day
high external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

STAGES OF ATTACHMENT
weakness

A

only conducted in working class
lacks population validity, theory may not be applicable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

STAGES OF ATTACHMENT
weakness

A

prone to social desirability
mothers may lie to seem better
may affect results as they are measured through questionnaires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ANIMAL STUDY- LORENZ
strength

A

REGOLIN AND VALLORTIGARA
exposed chicks to moving shapes, they imprinted
supports view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ANIMAL STUDY- LORENZ
weakness

A

humans are more complex and attachment system is different to birds.
therefore, may not be generalisable to humans even though research suggests attachment is innate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ANIMAL STUDIES- HARLOW
strength

A

harlows research helped social workers understand risk factors in child abuse.
understand importance of attachment forming in zoos
therefore, benefitted humans and animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ANIMAL STUDIES- HARLOW
weakness 1

A

monkeys are similiar to humans and may share attachment systems
human mind more complex
may not be generalisable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ANIMAL STUDIES- HARLOW
weakness 2

A

harlows caused long term, severe affects for monkeys eg: poor socialisation
ethical issues
shouldnt have been carried out?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

EXPLANATION OF ATT. THE LEARNING THEORY
strength 1

A

unlikely that food is primary drive for attachment.
however conditioning could play a big role eg: warmth for
STRENGTHENING attachment

18
Q

EXPLANATION OF ATT. THE LEARNING THEORY
strength 2

A

researchers have suggested parents teach love by them modelling.
learning theory provides explanations that babies take in developing att eg: reciprocity

19
Q

EXPLANATION OF ATT. THE LEARNING THEORY
weakness 1

A

lorenz- 1st moving
harlow- comfort
research provide evidence that attachments didnt form due to food, there are other factors that play a large part

20
Q

EXPLANATION OF ATT. THE LEARNING THEORY
weakness 2

A

bowlbys theory explains how and why att form
TLT only says how
TLT is over simplistic and only considers limited factors

21
Q

EXPLANATION OF ATT. BOWLBY
strength 1

A

research shows babies are distressed when parent doesnt respond to SO
supports SO are important

22
Q

EXPLANATION OF ATT. BOWLBY
strength 2 ( internal working )

A

in a study w/ 99 mothers
those with poor att to their parents were more likely to have 1 year olds that attached poorly
supports IWM as its passed through model

23
Q

EXPLANATION OF ATT. BOWLBY
weakness 1 ( relationships )

A

the relationship between the primary att figure may be stronger but not diff in quality.
- bowlby may have been wrong to suggest unique
- reduces validity

24
Q

EXPLANATION OF ATT. BOWLBY
weakness ( genetics )

A

other factors eg: genetically influenced personality is more important than parenting style in IWM
- overemphasised importance in IWM about later relationships
- contradicts

25
Q

AINSWORTH’S STRANGE SITUATION
strength 1 ( predicts )

A

attachment type predicts later development.
eg: secure should be great at school
IA worse outcomes like MH issues
evidence for validity
explains future outcomes

26
Q

AINSWORTH’S STRANGE SITUATION
strength 2 ( inter rater )

A

diff observations watching same babies agreed by 94%
att identified more accurate and doesnt depend on observer

27
Q

AINSWORTH’S STRANGE SITUATION
weakness 1 ( countries )

A

SS may not have same meaning in other countries
eg: japan babies dont seperate
difficult to know what SS measures across cultures

28
Q

AINSWORTH’S STRANGE SITUATION
weakness 2 ( main and solomon)

A

main and soloman created type d- disorganised.
mix of I.R and I.A and generally experience neglect
oversimplistic
only for babies with normal upbringings

29
Q

CULTURAL VARIATIONS
strength ( validity in countries)

A

van ljzeendorn and kroonenberg used studies conducted in countries that were researched by people from those countries
- inc validity
- no cultural bias
- pps understood instructions

30
Q

CULTURAL VARIATIONS
weakness 1 ( charactertistics)

A

pps who take part in research abroard may have characteristics that may have not been considered
- meta analysed may have dec validity due to confounding variables

31
Q

CULTURAL VARIATIONS
weakness 2

A

research may have imposed etic
( own views on another country)
germany may see I.A as good
different child rearing styles in diff cultures, behaviours in SS may have different meanings

32
Q

BOWLBYS MATERNAL DEPRIVATION
strength

A

Gao partially supported, showing poor quality maternal care is linked with high rates of psychopath in adults

33
Q

BOWLBYS MATERNAL DEPRIVATION
weakness 1 ( bias )

A

bowlby carried out interviews
determined who was AP
researcher bias
interpreted results
decreased validity

34
Q

BOWLBYS MATERNAL DEPRIVATION
weakness 2 ( rutter )

A

81% stated severe long term damages as MD was privation
bowlby overestimated seriousness in effects of MD

35
Q

BOWLBYS MATERNAL DEPRIVATION
weakness 3 ( koluchova )

A

czech twins adopted in teens were recovered from the abuse
contradicts

36
Q

INSTITUTIONALISATION
strength 1 ( social help )

A

the application has helped instituions put things in place eg: assigned 1/2 caregivers

37
Q

INSTITUTIONALISATION
strength 2 ( confoundings )

A

Romanian orphan studies have less confounding.
many experience the same early experiences
increased validity

38
Q

INSTITUTIONALISATION
weakness

A

most data from ERA only studied children as old as 20.
no adult data so cannot answer long term answers

lack of adult data means it will be a long time before we know long term affects

39
Q

early attachment on later
strength

A

fearon and roisman 2017
found early attachment constantly predicted later to their children
inc validity
research evidence

40
Q

early attachment on later
weakness 1 ( longitudinal )

A

studies into early att arent longitudinal
pps may not remember or lie
decreased validity

41
Q

early attachment on later
weakness 2 ( confounding )

A

early attachments and later may be affected by confoundings
cannot establish cause and affect
reduced validity