3.2.3.1 Psychological factors that can influence an individual in physical activities. 3.2.3.1.5 Aggression Flashcards
aggression
- harms another human being,
- intentional
- outside the laws or rules of the game
- reactive, out of control, deliberate and hostile
e. g punch in football
types of aggression
- hostile aggression : emotional response to another performer/situation, sole purpose= cause hurt/injury
e. g. punch in football - instrumental aggression : means to another goal e.g. tackle in rugby with huge force= intention to make them fear you or to be winded and out of game , primary motivation - take them out of the game (within the rules)
aggressive feelings lead to… (types)
don’t always = negative behaviour
- assertive behaviour: physical force within rules or ethics of a sport = legitimate
- channelled aggression:diverted -> positive & useful actions e.g working harder/ focusing more
assertion
- plays hard
- controlled & well motivated behaviour
- within the rules
- goal directed
e. g. going in hard for a tackle
theories of aggression
- instinct theory
- frustration aggression hypothesis
- aggressive cue hypothesis
- social learning theory of aggression
instinct theory
FREUD
- born aggressive instinct
- surfaces = enough provocation (ritualistic control) & injury threat
- calms down = catharsis (recover performance)
- nature vs nuture
- arousal = catastrophe theory = decrease performance
adv/dis of instinct theory
adv:
- aggression calms = channel aggression
- experience catharsis = outlet
dis:
aggression can be learnt/pre intended
increase aggression whilst playing rather than catharsis
not all ancestors aggressive (contradicts it being innate)
catharsis
controlled approach
- cleansing emotions = sport = outlet for aggression
- aggressive intent = outlet = reduce aggressive drive
experienced frustrated player = rid of aggressive inclination = experience catharsis not occur = more aggression
frustration aggression hypothesis
DOLLARD
inevitable aggression occurs= goals are blocked = frustrated, performer innate aggression tendencies
= aggressive act initiated = reduce aggressive drive = catharsis
unable to release aggressive drive = form of self punishment = increase frustration = increase aggressive drive
link between aggression and frustration
limitations of the frustration aggression hypothesis
- who experience frustration and aggression even when not blocked
- goals blocked = frustration but no aggression (control)
- aggressive without being frustrated, aggression isn’t always cathartic= could make them angrier
reasons why react aggressively due to frustration in sport:
- loosing
- poor play by you or team
- disagree with ref, being fouled
- pressure of success, high pressure games
- hostile crowd
aggressive cue hypothesis
BERKOWITZ
learn trigger =stimulus =frustrate =arousal = aggression
cue- coaches/ opponents/ equipment
learnt from significant other (nature approach)
adv and dis of aggressive cue hypothesis
adv:
frustration = increase arousal = good for elite
-aggressvie cues = channel = benefit = focus increase
-account environment
dis:
- different people react different to same cue (dont?)
- control- dont become aggressive as response
social learning theory of aggression
BANDURA (Bobo doll)
- learnt observing social norms(operant conditioning),
- association with others/copying behaviour reinforced from env
observe-identify-reinforce-copy
significant other/high esteem/role model/ team mate/ coach
-live behaviour = likely copied than recorded if consistent, powerful and bright
Bandura’s 5 main cognitive factors mediate control of aggressive behaviour
- attention (to aggressor)
- retention (model, put in LTM, remember to retrieve it)
- production (physically capable)
- motivation (positive reinforcement, rewards)
- self efficacy( confidence in ability/self belief give positive outcome)
adv and dis of social learning theory of aggression
adv:
analysis person impacted by those around
rewards = reoffending
unpunished = continue to bend rules
dis:
assume people learn the same
no copying, may alter behaviour (own opinion)
doesnt consider nature vs nature
aggression instinctive & reactive not learnt
react aggressively even not in situation observe& copy
6 strategies to control aggression
- mental calming techniques/mental rehearsal
- coaches talk to players - aggression strikes
- punish aggression (replace)
- reinforce ethics and values of sport
- goals = dont involve aggression
- promote walking away
Instinct theory AOs:
AO1: innate, tendency to act aggressive(natural response), sport = opportunity to act aggressively to release tension build up in controlled environment-peaceful in general life
AO2; rugby tackled hard therefore injury threat = aggression surface under threat
AO3: many aggressive sports people are aggressive outside of sport too, hunters & gatherers and close relatives aren’t aggressive
-not all people appear aggressive some people in a premeditated manner not instinctive
Aggressive cue hypothesis AOs:
AO1: certain cues for aggressive behaviour athlete highly aroused = presence of cues = aggressive behaviour
AO2: e.g. footballer triggered having to play specific opponent/team at their stadium
AO3: aggression sometimes occurs at an opponent as a genuine threat to athlete, some people display premeditated aggression which is not always in response to a cue
frustration aggression hypothesis AOs:
AO1: aggression only occurs when frustration is experienced, frustration occurs when athlete is prevented from reaching a goal they want to achieve
AO2: tennis player misses shot on match point = goal blocked = frustrated = aggressive
AO3: often see people acting aggressive even when not frustrated, other emotions occur along with frustration which may occur rather than aggression some performers give up when frustrated
social learning AOs
Ao1: aggression is learnt behaviour, individuals pick up from watching other act aggressive, aggressive behaviour more likely replicated if observer sees a significant other acting in an aggressive way
AO2: grass root player sees professional punch opponent in football when badly fouled and they do it too
AO3: doesnt account for persons biological makeup, isn’t clear whether observing aggressive behaviour willl have long term effect on actions of observer
causes of aggression
- bad play
- team mates (not trying)
- official decisions
- crowd/opponent
- importance
- religion/culture
- contact sport
- personality
- social learning
- over arousal