3.2.3.1 Psychological factors that can influence an individual in physical activities. 3.2.3.1.5 Aggression Flashcards
aggression
- harms another human being,
- intentional
- outside the laws or rules of the game
- reactive, out of control, deliberate and hostile
e. g punch in football
types of aggression
- hostile aggression : emotional response to another performer/situation, sole purpose= cause hurt/injury
e. g. punch in football - instrumental aggression : means to another goal e.g. tackle in rugby with huge force= intention to make them fear you or to be winded and out of game , primary motivation - take them out of the game (within the rules)
aggressive feelings lead to… (types)
don’t always = negative behaviour
- assertive behaviour: physical force within rules or ethics of a sport = legitimate
- channelled aggression:diverted -> positive & useful actions e.g working harder/ focusing more
assertion
- plays hard
- controlled & well motivated behaviour
- within the rules
- goal directed
e. g. going in hard for a tackle
theories of aggression
- instinct theory
- frustration aggression hypothesis
- aggressive cue hypothesis
- social learning theory of aggression
instinct theory
FREUD
- born aggressive instinct
- surfaces = enough provocation (ritualistic control) & injury threat
- calms down = catharsis (recover performance)
- nature vs nuture
- arousal = catastrophe theory = decrease performance
adv/dis of instinct theory
adv:
- aggression calms = channel aggression
- experience catharsis = outlet
dis:
aggression can be learnt/pre intended
increase aggression whilst playing rather than catharsis
not all ancestors aggressive (contradicts it being innate)
catharsis
controlled approach
- cleansing emotions = sport = outlet for aggression
- aggressive intent = outlet = reduce aggressive drive
experienced frustrated player = rid of aggressive inclination = experience catharsis not occur = more aggression
frustration aggression hypothesis
DOLLARD
inevitable aggression occurs= goals are blocked = frustrated, performer innate aggression tendencies
= aggressive act initiated = reduce aggressive drive = catharsis
unable to release aggressive drive = form of self punishment = increase frustration = increase aggressive drive
link between aggression and frustration
limitations of the frustration aggression hypothesis
- who experience frustration and aggression even when not blocked
- goals blocked = frustration but no aggression (control)
- aggressive without being frustrated, aggression isn’t always cathartic= could make them angrier
reasons why react aggressively due to frustration in sport:
- loosing
- poor play by you or team
- disagree with ref, being fouled
- pressure of success, high pressure games
- hostile crowd
aggressive cue hypothesis
BERKOWITZ
learn trigger =stimulus =frustrate =arousal = aggression
cue- coaches/ opponents/ equipment
learnt from significant other (nature approach)
adv and dis of aggressive cue hypothesis
adv:
frustration = increase arousal = good for elite
-aggressvie cues = channel = benefit = focus increase
-account environment
dis:
- different people react different to same cue (dont?)
- control- dont become aggressive as response
social learning theory of aggression
BANDURA (Bobo doll)
- learnt observing social norms(operant conditioning),
- association with others/copying behaviour reinforced from env
observe-identify-reinforce-copy
significant other/high esteem/role model/ team mate/ coach
-live behaviour = likely copied than recorded if consistent, powerful and bright
Bandura’s 5 main cognitive factors mediate control of aggressive behaviour
- attention (to aggressor)
- retention (model, put in LTM, remember to retrieve it)
- production (physically capable)
- motivation (positive reinforcement, rewards)
- self efficacy( confidence in ability/self belief give positive outcome)