25. ASSOCIATION VS CAUSATION Flashcards
- What were Aristotle’s first thoughts on Causality?
- all causes of things are beginnings
- we obtain scientific knowledge when we establish the
cause - to understand something’s existence is to understand
the reason why it exists
- How could we Paraphrase Aristotle’s thoughts on Causality?
- scientific knowledge requires explanations
- thee state the causes of outcomes
IT IS ESSENTIAL TO IDENTIFY A CAUSE:
- that causes an effect on health
- What is a Valid Association?
- a valid association is an exposure-outcome association
that upholds 3 important criteria
- What are the criteria that a Valid Association upholds?
- Chance
- Bias
- Confounding
- What is meant by “Chance”?
- chance has to be excluded as a possible explanation
for the association
- What provides information on “Chance”?
- the p-value
- the 95% Confidence Interval
- What is meant by “Bias”?
- bias has to be excluded as a possible explanation for
the association
- What provides information on “Bias”?
- there has to be a thorough check for errors
- this happens during Sample Selection and during the
Assessment of Variables
- What is meant by “Confounding”?
- this has to be excluded as a possible explanation for
the association
- What provides information on “Confounding”?
- the identification and adjustment of all the potential
confounders
- Can every Valid association automatically be proven as a Causation?
- no
- association does not equal causation
- What is a Causal Association?
- this is one in which the exposure directly or indirectly
causes the outcome of interest - the exposure can also contribute to the development
- What exists in order to help us decide whether there is a Causal Association present?
- the Bradford Hill criteria for Causation
- What are the 9 parameters of the Bradford Hill Criteria?
- Temporality
- Strength
- Biological Gradient
- Reversibility
- Consistency
- Plausibility
- Analogy
- Coherence
- Specificity
NB:
- the first 6 are the major and important criteria
- What is meant by “Temporality”?
- the exposure must precede the outcome
- the exposure must chronologically come before the
outcome
IN OTHER WORDS:
- the suspected cause of the disease must happen
before the actual disease occurs
- What is this an example of?
- a Temporal Association
- it makes reference to “early life”
- the exposure is chronologically preceding the outcome
- What is this an example of?
- a Non-Temporal association
- it makes reference to current situations
- the exposure and the outcome are happening
simultaneously
- What is meant by “Strength”?
THE STRONGER THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE EXPOSURE AND THE OUTCOME:
- the more likely it is to be a form of Causation
- they are more likely to be causal
- What is this an example of?
- a Strong Association
THE RISK RATIO IS HIGH:
- since those who smoke are 4 times as likely to
experience lung cancer than those who do not
THE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
- is also very high
- What is this an example of?
- a weak Association
THE RISK RATIO IS A RELATIVELY LOW:
- since those who smoke are 10% more likely to
experience lung cancer than those who do not
THE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL:
- is also low
- What is meant by “Biological Gradient”?
- this is the dose-response association
- it exists between the exposure and the outcome
- What is this an example of?
- this is a Dose-Response association
- the dose and the response increase proportionally
- What is this an example of?
- this is not a Dose-Response association
- the dose and the response do not increase
proportionally
- What is meant by: “Removing”?
- this is also known as Reducing
- removing or reducing the exposure will reduce the
incidence of the outcome - it can also reduce the severity
- What is this an example of?
- this is an Example where there is Reversibility in the
association - the exposure is reduced
- this reduces the outcome
- What is this an example of?
- this is an Example where there Reversibility does not
exist in the association - the exposure is reduced
- it does not have an effect on the outcome
- What is meant by: “Consistency”?
- the association between the exposure and the risk is
observed in multiple situations and occasions
THE RESULTS CAN BE REPLICATED:
- in different populations
- with the use of different study designs
- What is this an example of?
- this is a Consistent Association
- What is this an example of?
- this is not a Consistent Association
- What is meant by “Plausability”?
- there exists a theoretically proven and logical
explanation for the association between the exposure
and the outcome
PLAUSIBILITY EXISTS:
- if we can find a biological mechanism or connection
that explains the association
- What is this an example of?
- this is a biologically PLAUSIBLE association
- What is this an example of?
- as association that is not biologically PLAUSIBLE
- there is no proof of current evidence