2-motivation Flashcards
how do psychologists organize motivation
- regulatory vs purposive (internal vs external)
- habit vs goal-directed
- model-free vs model-based (choose bc of acquired value of something vs guess outcomes and choose behaviours)
- seeking appetitive outcomes vs avoiding aversive outcomes
- preference vs persistence vs vigour
- averages vs individual differences
instinct
exhibit behaviours, often complex behaviours without any learning
often refer to these as “hardwired”, “genetic”, or “instinctual”
from biological perspective is a species-specific pattern of behaviour that is not learned
James definition of instinct
faculty of acting in such a way as to produce a certain end without foresight of that end, and without eh individual’s having previous education in that performance
4 criteria of instinct according to tinbergen
- stereotyped (pattern)
- characteristic
- in isolation
- without practice
problems with the concept of instinct
it has CIRCULAR REASONING
- not falsifiable
- not experimental
- not many insights gained
tabula rasa
the BLANK SLATE
- behaviourism
- environment plays a critical role
theory that individuals are born without built-in mental content, and therefore all knowledge comes from experience or perceptio
instinctive drift
after a while of no operant conditioning, conditioned animals would revert to normal animal-specific behaviours
opposes the idea of the blank slate
solution to this? just stick to what these animals are inclined to do!
modern concept of instinct
- constrained to very simple behaviours (reflex)
- more common in (neurobiologically) simpler life
- think more in terms of species-specific behaviours that aren’t strictly “hardwired” (simply predisposed to specific behaviours)
supernormal stimuli
external stimuli that causes an extra vigorous response for species-specific behaviours
species-specific behaviours can be released by…
external stimuli
why do species-specific behaviours make evolutionary sense
- preparedness
- imprinting
what manifests species-specific behaviours?
species-specific nervous system
drive-reduction theory
motivates one to return to HOMEOSTASIS
Hull’s drive theory
- Deviations from homeostasis create physiological needs
- Emphasizes the role that habits play in the type of behaviour response in which we engage
E = H x D
E= excitatory potential
H = habit
D = drive
drive believe to energize all responses equally
response most strongly associated with present stimuli will occur
predictions/implications of Hull’s thoery
- increase in H or D will energize multiple responses
- increase in D is punishing, decrease is reinforcing
simple/well-learned response situation: clear dominant response
complex/little-learned response situation: multiple competing responses
irrelevant drives will interfere with goal-relavant behavior!
testing Hull’s theory: does increased drive increase all behaviours?
probably not
food/water deprivation: increases many but not all activity, and not to the same level
conditioned activity experiments effectively contradict this implication of Hull’s theory
testing hull’s theory: overall excitatory potential? I.e. is a hunger rat more motivated
yeaaahhhhh but probably not as hull predicted
hungrier animals increase E (motivation), but only for food
animals display GOAL-RELATED, not reflexive/drive behaviour!
testing hull’s theory: does a behaviour truly reflect a drive, a reflexive response to a need
probably not
rats can be motivated on appropriate days, even if it doesn’t reflect their current drives
reminiscent of state-dependent memory
verdict on Hull’s theory
- we do act sometimes as though we are working to reduce a drive buuuuut
- drives don’t energize all behaviours
- our behaviour is contingent upon learning
- behaviour often has a goal-directed quality to it
activation theory
- motivation is determined by level of arousal
- similar to drive theory, it’s an “energization” of behaviour without direction
- but… unlike drive theory, it’s derived from physical basis – reticular activation system
the reticular activating system
AKA reticular formation
- wakefulness, arousal, sleep, consciousness
- Coma and anaesthetics affect RAS
Yerkes-Dodson curve
optimal levels of arousal
simple task is performed best when arousal levels are relatively high and complex tasks are best performed when arousal levels are lower
the inverted U!!! there is a point where the amount of pressure will make highest performance!!
but…. low pressure = boredom and low performance
tooo high pressure = high stress, anxiety, unhappiness
is well-replicated
we’re all sitting at different baselines though
how to test yerkes-dodson curve
test arousal level with DROGS
the less stimulating, the more stress you can handle before concentration drops out
motor impulsivity
“action without foresight”
like when you accidentally start running before the gun goes pew
choice impulsivity
small immediate reward vs larger later reward
Easterbrook hypothesis
arousal reduces range of cues that an organism attends to
so arousal NARROWS ATTENTION
basically why arousal changes our performance
the modern Yerkes-Dodson and Easterbrook: Amy Arnsten
as arousal goes up, more catecholamines are released into the prefrontal cortex
at low arousal, the PFC fires for everything
at high arousal, it shuts down
there is a SWEET SPOT between arousal and catecholamines
ADHD
KEY SYMPTOMS:
- extreme inattention
- hyperactivity
- impulsivity
- 11% of American 4- to 17- year-olds receive this diagnosis after displaying key symptoms
- psychostimulants (amphetamine, methylphenidate) improve symptoms
- hypothesis: ADHD driven by low dopamine function, so they have a low baseline arousal
- stress and arousal focus your attention, so lack thereof makes you unable to focus or focus on too much
ludic behaviour
- things we look for but does not have any biological benefit
- recreational activity
we seek:
- novelty
- uncertainty
- conflict
- complexity
a hierarchy of needs
Maslow
- wasn’t based on evidence
- later evidence to support concepts, but not necessarily the overall idea (may not always need to satisfy all lower needs)
physiology of hunger drive theory
“humans automatically regulate caloric intake through a homeostatic system to prevent energy deficits and maintain stable body weight”
- drive theory!
- but… not well supported
set point theory (physiology of obesity) the two types
GLUCOSTATIC
- maintain blood sugar levels
- short term
LIPOSTATIC
- body fat levels
- as they go up and down, it will influence your hunger and eating