1. Argo & Dahl (2018): Standards of beauty: the impact of mannequins in the retail contex Flashcards

1
Q

main finding

A

a female mannequin is demonstrated to have negative implications for both male and female consumers low in appearance self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

main finding in particulair

A

consumers who are lower in appearance self-esteem evaluate a product displayed by a mannequin more negatively as compared with consumers higher in appearance self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why this main finding effect?

A

as mannequins signal the normative standard of beauty and consumers with low self-esteem in regard to their appearance believe they fail to meet this standard, these consumers become threatened by the beauty standard when exposed to a mannequin and in response denigrate the product the mannequin is displaying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

appereance relatecy

A

through the finding that the effect for male and female consumers with low appearance self-esteem arises only when the mannequin is displaying an appearance-related product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

mediation effect

A

through mediation analysis demonstrating that the mannequin conveys society’s standard of beauty and that this negatively impacts product evaluations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

mitigation effect

A

through mitigation of the effect by removing the presence of threat via a self-affirmation task or decreasing the mannequin’s beauty (e.g., marking its face, removing its hair, or removing its head)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Research question

A

how people low or high in appearance self-esteem respond to mannequins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

study 1a
study 1b
study 1c

A

Study 1a: participants lower in self-esteem evaluated the bikini less favorable
Study 1b: participants lower in self-esteem rated a party dress lower when wore by a mannequin than when it just hang on the hanger; no differences in product evaluations arose when the mannequin was not present
Study 1c: people high in self-esteem evaluated appearance-related products the same as not appearance-related product, people with low self-esteem evaluated appearance-related products lower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Study 2

A

low self-esteem people evaluated the product much lower in the non-affirmation condition, the same goes for willingness to pay, no effect with high self-esteem people aka increasing self esteem migitated the effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

study 3a
study 3b

A

Study 3a: if the mannequin did not have hair, people low in self-esteem evaluated the product equally to high self-esteem. The same effect for mannequins with a scar on the face
Study 3b: mannequins with a missing limb, same finding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Learnings for managers

A

the degree to which we react to cultural norms depends also on individual factors, companies need to take this into consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Important

A

the finding that our effects arise for both females and males (when a mannequin is female) provides strong evidence that consumers with low appearance self- esteem are threatened by this global standard rather than by information obtained through a direct comparison to the mannequin itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly