week 9: metamemory Flashcards
(45 cards)
cue utilization hypothesis
- familiarity w question
- originated from a framework describing how ppl answer questions
- cue-based info emphasis
- more familiar cue=better judgement
metamemory def
- awareness of our own memory
- in three steps: learn something, appraise your learning, and rate the quality of memory
cue vs targets
cues: questions or prompts
targets: memory traces that ppl make judgements about
target based sources
- info from memory trace about which the judgement is made
- info that was retrieved from memory
- ease of recovery
cue based sources
- info taken from memory cue (ie question)
steps for cue utilization hypothesis
- find fact in memory
- retrieve plausible answer from facts that are in memory
- evaluate amount of available info relevant to the question
accessibility hypothesis
- ppl make inferences on what is in memory based on info available including partial retrieval
- also, intensity of memory traces
competition hypothesis
- metamemory judgements are influenced by memory competition during retrieval
- target based sources
- metamemory judgements are higher with less competing info
judgements of learning
- estimates of our own learning
- we are poor estimators of how well we have learned
why are we bad at JOL
- inability hypothesis: we are incapable of accurately appraising our own mental states or cog processes
- monitoring retrieval hypothesis: when we make judgements, info is still in WM so we are over confident
what types of cues affect JOLs
- extrinsic: aspects of learning situation eg massed vs distributed
- intrinsic: aspects material being learned ie perceived ease/fluency of learning (JOLs are sensitive to it) consistent w cue utilization
- mnemonic: accessibility, shift from intrinsic, memory based sources of info, assessments on how we previously did
t or f: JOLs decrease with competition and increase with time
false, decrease with both
allocation of study time and JOLs
- study time should maximize amount of new knowledge learned
- can allocate study time to optimize JOL and learn some things over others
labour in vain effect
- when ppl encounter hard info, they put more effort into learning it but bc it is so difficult, ppl have trouble learning anything new
- there is little gained knowledge
region of proximal learning
when people shift to spending more time on material that is just beyond their current ability
feelings of knowing
- occurs when you cant remember but feel as though you will in time or that youd recognize the info if presented with it
- based on what you think you should know
- info released slowly (revelation effects)
- correspond well to memory if accurate partial info is provided
- reasonably good predictors
game show method for FOK
- first to buzz in gets to answer
ppl with ____ damage are less accurate on FOK tasks
frontal lobe
which increases FOK: when info is revealed slowly or all at once
slowly
tip of the tongue state
- failure to recall info but feel that you are abt to retrieve it
- theory: incomplete activation view
incomplete activation view
- TOT occurs when search range has not been sufficiently narrowed
- too many possibilities so we cannot retrieve desired word
block view TOT
- TOT occur when related but inappropriate competitors are activated to a greater degree and block access to appropriate info
- cycle of retrieving the wrong, most recent info
remember know judgement
- remember= conscious recollection of circumstances in which info was learned
- know= no conscious recollection, only general familiarity feeling
things that affect remember but not know responses
- elaborative rehearsal
- context
- generational effects
- frequency
- intentionality
- divided attention at learning
- serial position
- production/drawing
- retention intervals (<1 day)
- reading out loud