week 4: forgetting Flashcards
seven sins of memory (Schacter) list
- misattribution
- suggestibility
- bias
- persistance
- transience
- absentmindedness
- blocking
forgetting usefulness
- may not want to maintain all experiences
- forgetting can be adaptive
- makes room for newer, more accurate engrams
- help in emo regulation
- helps disengage in past and focus on present
engram
physical trace of a memory in the brain
seven sins of memory (Schacter): transience
- memories are forgotten w passage of time
- less reproductive and more reconstructive over time
- ie forgetting curve (rapid early on and more time passed=more forgotten)
seven sins of memory (Schacter): absentmindedness
- min wandering, not fully paying attention
- perception does not have to have as many details as usual bc you arent encoding info
- divided attention: not paying attention as much as you would if doing only one task
seven sins of memory (Schacter): blocking
- cant access memory bc other ones get in the way (block)
- cue overload, when too many things are associated w one cue, it becomes less effective
- can be adaptive bc more effort to remember specific items makes it easy to remember later on
seven sins of memory (Schacter): misattribution
- forgetting abt nature of source of memory
- forget nature of memory but not content
seven sins of memory (Schacter): suggestibility
- outside sources suggest/lead memories to change
- you can gain false memories
- memories are implanted from outside sources which can make correct info be forgotten
- can be intentional or not
seven sins of memory (Schacter): bias
- memories can be distorted to what you already know
- can lead to forgetting true info
seven sins of memory (Schacter): persistence
- instead of forgetting, false info is not forgotten
- info that should be forgotten is not forgotten
- memory is compromised by incorrect knowledge
when taking a picture what do you pay more attention to: action of you taking the pic or the content of the pic?
action of taking the pic
availability vs accessibility
- availability: whether trace is present in memory, may not have been encoded/may be lost
- accessibility: idea that the trace is somewhere in memory but issue with getting to it
forgetting of ABMs is more ____
linear
- stable amount of info is lost, increase in proportion of info lost
negatively accelerating vs linear pattern of forgetting difference
negatively accelerating: conveys consistent loss in proportion of memories overtime
linear: conveys consistent loss in amount of info loss overtime
- increase in proportion lost overtime
why does liner forgetting occur
- memories have components or features
- features are forgotten, following standard pattern
- during retrieval, only partial info is available
- memories can be reconstructed from partial traces and give accurate response
law of disuse
as time passes w out memory being used, it decays away and is forgotten
storage vs retrieval strength
storage: how well a memory is encoded, more practice, better storage strength
retrieval: ease of retrieval from memory, strongest after learning
constant vs varied context in retrieval
varied was harder to remember bc it does not allow for retrieval strength to develop
proactive interference
- older memories impair retrieval of newer memories, especially when they are similar
- decreased similarity releases proactive interference
- reduced by sleep
- info that is interleaved rather than blocks of related knowledge have less interference
associate interference
- interference based on amount of associated info
- complexity of newly learned info
- fan effect: assumes info is stored in prepositional memory network with nodes repping individual concepts and links that rep associations between them
retroactive interference
- newer memories impair retrieval for older memories
- during sleep there is less retroactive interference
- more severe recall than recognition (ie what did you see vs did you see this)
- with good cues, it is limited
paradox of the expert
- experts have more info than novices but dont have difficulty in associative interference and can remember easier
- chunking
event boundries and forgetting
- doorways, scene changes and transitions
- encountering event boundary leads set up of new mental model of event and moves mental model of old event out of WM to make room
why do people not remember the object carried when going room to room vs going across a long room
move across the room: the object is in just one mental model and there is no interference
room to room: the object is now is two mental models and the memories compete during retrieval which produces interference