Week 7 Flashcards

1
Q

Dual process model of persuasion

A

Peripheral process: unconscious, fast (using heuristics for eval for example)
Central process : conscious, slower (use of systematic processing of info for eval)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Elaboration-Likelihood model (ELM)

A
  • regarding a message recipient’s cognitive responses to persuasion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Central idea of ELM

A

Sometimes people process persuasive messages mindlessly and effortlessly, but other times they process messages deeply and attentively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Peripheral route

A
  • not motivated or not able to think carefully about the message
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Central route

A

Motivates and able to think carefully about the message.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe in detail what central processing involves

A
  • thinking carefully and deliberately about the content of the message
  • high ability and motivation
  • not distracted and if you care, you will pay attention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe what peripheral processing involves

A
  • low ability and motivation
  • if you are distracted, or dont care enough, will use superficial clues, will not pay attention lot of attention.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Petty et al study testing ELM method

A
  • gave undergrads a list of arguments for comprehensive exit exams
  • 3 things manipulated:
  • strong vs weak arguments (central)
  • source expertise (peripheral)
  • personal relavance (motivation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Petty et al strong vs weak

A
  • strong arguments lead to more attitude changes for pps to whom the issue is personally relavant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Petty et al expert vs non expert source

A
  • expertise of the source of the communication matters more for pps to whom the issue is not personally relavant
  • suggests that they mainly attend to peripheral aspects of the message.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Factors that determine persuasion

A

Message source (who)
Message content (what)
Message audience (whom)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Halo effect

A

People you like are assumed to have other good qualities as well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Credibility

A
  • wether the sources are reliable or not
  • eg using white coats, experts in advertisements to increase trust in a certain idea or product
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Certainty

A
  • people who are certain and confident tend to be judged as more credible.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The sleeper effect

A
  • messages from unreliable sources tend to be rejected initially but over time become accepted.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When are messages more persuasive

A
  • high quality
  • clear, logical
  • appeal to core values of the audience
  • argue against self-interest
  • conclusions are explicit in the message
17
Q

Identifiable victim effect

A
  • messages that focus on a single, vivid individual are more persuasive than fact-based messages
18
Q

Effect of extreme fear

A
  • causes people to tune out the message, resulting in lack of persuasion
19
Q

Effect of culture on persuasion

A
  • eastern ads emphasize the group
  • western ads emphasize the individual
  • east Asians respond more favorably to prevention focus advertising vs westerners
20
Q

How can age affect persuasion

A
  • younger age = easier persuasion (Sears study with presidential election malleability)
21
Q

How can audience characteristics (emotion wise) affect persuasion

A
  • mood can affect - emotion acts as a cue that something is important
  • mood+strong message = more persuasion
22
Q

How can cognition affect persuasion

A
  • the depth in which a person may think about things (need for cognition)
  • High NFC people persuaded by central cues
  • low NFC people persuaded by peripheral cues
23
Q

Metacgntion

A
  • thinking about our own thinking
24
Q

Self validation hypothesis

A
  • idea that feeling confidence about our thoughts validates them, making it more likely that we’ll be swayed in their direction. (The direction of the thoughts)
25
Q

Agenda control

A
  • media contributes to shaping the information that we think is true and important
26
Q

Shared attention

A
  • when people believe that they are attending to a message in a group, they process it more centrally.
27
Q

What attention biases and resistance can affect persuasion?

A

Schemas
Selective attention

28
Q

Surgeon general stats on smoking

A
  • when released that smoking leads to lung cancer, 40% of smokers found doc to be flawed, but only 10% of non-smokers found it to be flawed.
29
Q

Edwards et al

A
  • listened to messages advocating légalisation of marijuana
  • message had 7 real and 7 silly arguments
  • people who were FOR, stopped the buzz during real arguments and vice versa
30
Q

How can publicly committing to an attitude affect persuasion

A
  • more resistant to change of that behavior/attitude
  • more blinded to that attitude/behavior now, because you have publicly committed to it.
31
Q

Thought polarisation

A

Thinking about an issue tends to produce more extreme, resistant attitudes

32
Q

How can knowledge affect resistance

A
  • more knowledge in a certain domain = more resistance to persuasion
33
Q

Attitude inoculation

A
  • resisting a ‘small’ attack on our attitude makes us better able to resist larger attacks later (like a vaccination)