week 4 Flashcards
Acculturation
- Acculturation comprehends those phenomena which result when groups of individuals having different cultures come into continuous first-hand contact, with subsequent changes in the original cultural patterns of either of both groups.
- Acculturation changes that an individual experiences as a result of contact with one or more other cultures and of the participation in the ensuing process of change that one’s cultural or
ethnic group is undergoing.
Acculturating groups.
Who is in an acculturation setting?
- Mobility (sedentary vs. migrant – temporary)
- Voluntariness of contact (voluntary or involuntary)
EXAMPLES:
Sedentary & voluntary: Friesland in the Netherlands
Sedentary & involuntary: Native American Indians -> European settlers
Migrant & voluntary: Immigrants (permanent), Sojourners (international students – temporary)
Migrant & involuntary: Asylum seekers (temporary), refugees (permanent)
One dimensional conceptualization of acculturation
cultural maintenance
cultural adoption
Cultural maintenance
Maintaining characteristics of own (heritage) culture
Cultural adoption
Adopting characteristics of the culture of the (host) society of settlement
The bidimensional conceptualization of acculturation
integration (behoud die van jezelf en neemt ook cultuur van nieuwe aan)
speration (behoud die van jezelf en neemt NIET de cultuur van nieuwe aan)
assimilation (doet je eigen cultuur weg en neemt cultuur van nieuwe aan)
marginalization (doet je eigen cultuur weg en neem NIET de cultuur van de nieuwe aan)
Berry’s bidimensional model
involves two dimensions:
involvement with the heritage culture and involvement with the
dominant, mainstream culture (integration, separation,
assimilation, marginalization)
acculturation orrientations berry (tabel)
integration. seperation.
assimilation. marginalisation.
Acculturation: Domain Specificity
superordinate level (public & private), ordinate level (more specific life domain), subordinate level (specific situations)
one and Two Statement Method
One Statement
EXAMPLE
I find it important to have:
1. Only Dutch friends
2. More Dutch friends than
German friends
3. As many German as Dutch
friends
4. …
One and Two Statement Method: two statements
A two-statement method can give you more details than a one statement method
EXAMPLE
I find it important to have
German friends. [1-5]
I find it important to have Dutch
friends. [1-5
four statement method
Four statements also include marginalization. People can compare themselves to the profiles and inform the researcher about how much they fit in with this specific profile.
A problem: We do not know to which part of the item people are responding, because there are two parts, that makes this a double-barreled item. A lot of ‘and’ statements. If you only like one and not the other, then you already have a problem.
EXAMPLE
It is not important for me to have Dutch Caribbean friends, and it is also not important for me to have Dutch friends
1 2 3 4 5
It is important for me to have Dutch Caribbean friends, and it is also important for me to have Dutch friends
1 2 3 4 5
It is important for me to have Dutch Caribbean friends, but it is not important for me to have Dutch friends
1 2 3 4 5
It is important for me to have Dutch friends, but it is not important for me to have Dutch Caribbean friends
1 2 3 4 5
vignette method
A brief description is
given of a person who displays a certain acculturation orientation. Participants indicate level of agreement.
EXAMPLE:
Bilge Erker came five years ago to the Netherlands. When she came here, she quickly realized that it was easier for her to find Turkish friends than to find Dutch friends. She finds it now more important to maintain good relations with other Turkish persons in the Netherlands than to establish relationships with Dutch persons. Indicate to what extent you
agree with Bilge’s views.
1. Agree completely
2. Agree fairly
3. Do not agree, do not disagree
4. Disagree fairly
5. Disagree completely
multiculturalism
Acknowledge and value group membership and diversity
Colorblindness
Downplay differences.
Emphasize individuals.
Equal treatment individually.
Assimilationism
Majority as the norm.
Minority adopts to the majority
equal treatment leads to..
not equal treatment leads to..
equal treatment leads to: Hihger school engagement and motivation. Better Performance
not equal treatment leads to: Lower school engagement. Worse performance
Types of Return Migration
Return of failure (difficulties w/ adjustment)
Return of conservatism (separation, then return)
Return of retirement
Return of innovation (agents of change)
Immigrant paradox
immigrants tend to show better physical
health compared to non-immigrants and further negative health outcomes; possible explanations: healthy behaviors, social support, immigrant selectivity
State integration policies: Pluralism
immigrant adopts the public values, the state has no mandate in regulating the private values
State integration policies: Civic ideology
same as pluralism, but no state fund can be granted for the maintenance or promotion of the private values of particular groups
State integration policies: Assimilation ideology
immigrants adopt public values, expectation to adopt their own cultural
and linguistic distinctiveness, voluntarily/imposed assimilation (France)
State integration policies: Ethnist ideology
immigrants adopt public values, voluntarily/imposed assimilation, expectation that immigrants reject their own ethnocultural identity, no expectation to assimilate because no
intention of ever accepting immigrants
Return migration:
failure, conservatism, retirement, innovation