STATS lec 19- clinical stats Flashcards

1
Q

Risk

A
  • In clincal research risk is the probability of something
  • P =n/N
  • Where P is the risk (probability) n is how often it occurs
  • N is the total population under study
  • The risk of rolling a 6 is ??
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Odds

A
  • Another way of expressing the likelihood of occurrence
  • Odds = n/N-n
  • The odds of rolling a 6 are
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Example- Excelin (high risk)

A
  • Disease occurs (event rate) 40% in the control group e.g. 5 yrs death rate
  • But only occurs at 30% with drug
  • Absolute risk in control group (CER=0.4) = 40% without drug
  • Intervention = drug
  • Absolute risk in intervention group (IER=0.3) = 30% with drug
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The cure study

A
  • Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation
  • Patients with ACS have major vascular events.. does giving them clopidogrel reduce the risk of these events
  • from 11.4% to 9.3% over 12 months
  • So CER = 0.114, IER=0.093
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Example 1- 2x2 contingency table

A
  • Outcome is always on the top
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Example 2- Excelin (low risk)

A
  • The Excelin trial is repeated in a more healthy population
  • Rat eofdeath is 10% in the control group and 7.5% in the intervention group
  • CER= 0.1 IER= 0.075
  • CER = 10/100
  • IER = 7.5/100
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Absolute risk- AR

A
  • AR is how likely something will occur
  • The probability that an individual will experience the specified outcome during a specified period
  • Range 0 to 1 or %
  • In contrast to common usage, the word risk may refer to adverse events or desirable events (MI or CURE)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Absolute risk reduction (or increase)

A
  • Controlrisk - Interventionrisk
  • # 1 (high risk) = 40% - 30% = 1-%
  • # 2 (low risk)= 10%-7.5% = 2.5%
  • ARR = CER - IER
  • Can be misleading since it depends on the population characteristics, tells you more about disease in cohort as oppose to drug
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Relative risk (risk ratio)- RR

A
  • The number of times more likely (RR >1) or less likely (RR<1) an event is to happen in one group compared with another
  • It is the ratio of the absolute risk (AR) for each group
  • Think of it as the proportional risk
  • RR= IER/CER (for both groups RR=0.75)
  • RR>1 means increased risk
  • RR= 1 means no difference in risk
  • RR <1 Means risk reduced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Relative risk reduction

A

Controlrisk - Interventionrisk /Controlrisk

  • RRR= 40-30/40 = 25% for population 1
  • RRR = 10-7.5%/10%= 25% for population 2
  • RRR Can be misleading since it doesn’t tell you how many patients will benefit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

absolute v relative risk

A
  • Disadvantage of RRR
    • Doesn’t take into account baseline risk of population groups- end up an insignificant result appearing significant
  • NB- Large difference between RRR & ARR only occurs when the outcome is rare
  • Undue emphase on either RRR or ARR can be misleading- check both before deciding on real benefit of a drug
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Example 3- superal

A
  • Drug superal has RR reduction for stroke of 33% but increased risk of severe gastric bleeding 3-fold
  • The baseline risk of gastric bleeding in the general populaiton is 1%/year
  • Who should we treat with superal
  • What are the RR and AR for stroke in P1 and P2
  • What are the RR and AR for adverse effects in P1 and P2
  • Calc: CER, IER, ARR, RRR NNT, NNH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Superal

A
  • Superal has RRR for stroke of 33% but increased risk of severe gastric bleeding- 3 fold
  • P1 Primary prevention
    • 3%/3yrs, down to 2%… Net effect down by 1%
    • Bleed risk is 3%/3yrs increased to 9%/3yrs, net effect up by 6%
    • Stroke down by 1%, bleed up by 6%
  • P2 Secondary prevention
    • 30% risk/3yrs down to 20% net effect down by 10%
    • Stroke down by 10 %, bleed up by 6%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Numbers needed to treat (NNT)

A
  • A more useful way of thinking about effect
  • NNT = 1/ARR
  • What is the NNT for superal?
  • What is the number needed to harm for superal (NNH= 1/ARR)
  • NNT is the number of fo subjects who must be treated with the intervention, compared with the control for 1 addiotnal subject to experience the beneficial outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Superal Numbers needed to

A
  • P1-NNT = 100
  • P1-NNH = 16
  • P2-NNT= 10
  • P2-NNH= 16
  • Describe in whole numbers
  • If necessary round NNT up; Round NNH down
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Odds ration- OR

A
  • Is the ratio of
  • Odds of outcome in intervention group … against …
  • Odds of outcome in the control group
  • Used in cross-sectional studies and case-control studies
  • In a (non-real) study of 2,500 patients taking aspirin it was found that 42 had GI bleeding
  • The number of people with GI bleeds in the general population is 1 in 100
  • What are the odds ration for aspirin causing GI bleeds
17
Q

Odds ratios

A
  • RRR, NNT preferred as more intuitive
  • Still needed for
    • Meta-analyses (As event rates differ between populations)
    • Case-control studies- especially where population event rate unknown
    • Multiple regression
18
Q

Confidence Intervals- CI

A
  • Accuracy of measurement
  • CI decreases as sample size increases
  • All measures (ARR, RRR, OR) should have confidence intervals
  • If the confidence interval for an OR crosses 1, then a significant efect has not been found
19
Q

Ways to cheat on statistical tests

A
  • Throw all data in the computer and report all results p<0.05 (data dredging)
  • If the two groups are different and this benefits the intervention group, forget to adjust
  • Ignore all drop-outs, only analyse subjects that complete treatment
  • If outliers (unusal results) are messing up the results then get rid of them. On the other hand, if they make the results better then keep them
  • If you gain significance early; stop the trial. If you almost gain significance, the extend the trial
  • If the whole group isn’t significant, look for sub-groups that are