social psychology (text 4) Flashcards

1
Q

person x situation interaction

A

-kurt lewin

“founder of social psychology”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

person x situation interaction

Behavioral outcome

A

dependent on combination of the characteristics of the person, given the current environment
-battle between the strength of the personality vs. the situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Person x situation

cognitive affective personality system

A

-Walter Mischel
-cognitive affective personality system
-if-then personality
(if a situation is like X, then she will act like A)
-a person is only neurotic to the extent that they are in situations that evoke a neurotic response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Attitudes

A
  • a learned evaluation of a particular person, behavior, belief or things
  • ABCS: affective, behavioral, cognitive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

attitudes many times can lead to behavior

A

true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

sometimes behavior leads to attitudes

A

Ben’s self perception theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

cognitive dissonance

A
  • festinger
  • DISSONANCE is created when 2 simultaneous attitudes or beliefs (cognitions) are operating in opposition of each other
  • strong dissonance when our actions do not represent the core self
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Festinger and Carlsmith experiment (1959)

A

-participants did a boring task and when the experiment was over, the researches asked them to help out by filling in for an experimenter who could;t make it …
-conditions 1: got $1 to tell the participant the task was fun and interesting
condition 2: got $2o to tell the participant that the task was fun and interesting

  • FINDINGS:
  • the $20 condition had little dissonance–>they could attribute their actions to having been paid so much money
  • the $1 condition experienced dissonance (“i said it was fun and interesting but it wasn’t”)
  • to relieve this internal inconsistency, they were more likely to alter their attitude toward the task (maybe it was fun??)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If you want someone to like you

A

ask them for a favor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Schemas

A

-set of cognitions about people and social experiences, we gain info as we experiences different events in ou r lives that we can use to organize what we know

  • an outline of experiences that help us make predictions about what to expect in the future
  • when you go to a restaurant, what is going to happen?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

schemas add

A

structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

social roles

A

schemas for how we act within different situations with different individuals
-me as a best friend, me as a daughter, student, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stereotype

A

beliefs about a particular set of people, based on race, sex, age, culture, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

social categorization

similar to us

A

ingroup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

social categorization

different from us

A

outgroup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When stereotypes are hateful: PREJUDICE

A

a negative belief about people from an outgrip; typically goes along w a negative affective response
-cognitively-based (conscious) and emotional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When stereotypes are hateful: Discrimination

A

-the transfer of prejudice to behavior1-actually treating people unequally because they fall into a stereotypes group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

-often times our stereotypes may influence our actions without our knowing

A
  • confirmation bias
  • self-fulfilling prophecy: the tendency to bring out the qualities of another person that you believe that they have (regardless of if they actually do)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

do stereoptyes have to be bad to be harmful

A
  • chinese: smart at math

- African american: athletic, can dance

20
Q

subtype

A

if a person doesn’t fit the stereotype

ex: he just happens to be an African American who can’t dance”

21
Q

Asch (1956) ‘line’ study

A
  • participants go in order and indicate which line is most similar to the target line
  • trial 1 and 2: first 5 participants choose the correct line
  • trail 3: they choose a line thats not correct
22
Q

Asch (1956) line study findings

A
  • when alone, participants were correct 99% of the time
  • in the conforming conditions, 37% of participants responses with the incorrect line (only 63% did not conform)
  • 76% of participants go with the group at least 1 time
23
Q

what reasons would lead people to say the wrong line ?

A

-anxiety, self doubt, cost/benefit analysis

24
Q

elevator example

A

you know it

25
milligrams study of obedience
-one person is teacher, one is learner -teacher gives shocks to the learner for incorrect judgments -you are told to increase the shock by 15-volt increments every time the learner is wrong -learner screams and cries as volts increase and eventually falls silent -4 verbal prods that encourage you to go on -
26
Milligram study findings
- 65% of Milgrams's sample of 40 people went all the way to 450 volts - in a later design, teachers were informed that the learner had a heart condition-->63% still buzzed to the max - experiment was scrutinized for exceeding the limits of ethical research
27
factors that lead to harmful obedience
1. victims emotional distance (dehumanize, limit empathy, limit accountability to participant) 2. Authority closeness, legitimacy (works best when authority member is present-effects were diminished when done from phone, people must believe the authority is legitimate=white coat effect) 3. institutionalization of authority (sometimes it matter where the authority is located, yale vs commercial business ) 4. Liberating effects of groups (isolation increases desire to comply, if there is more than one person, people tend to look to others to establish what's right or wrong)
28
how do we get people to do stuff for us?
art of a used car salesman
29
6 principles of compliance
1. -liking 2. commitment/ consistency 3. -scarcity - 4. reciprocity - 5. social validation (conformity) 6. -authority
30
foot in the door experiment
- asked people to sign a petition for safe driving and a few weeks later came back and asked them to put a huge sign that says "drive Carefully" - 55% in the petition condition agreed, 17% in control (no petition) agreed -once we comply with a small request, we seem to be more willing to comply with a larger one
31
Door in the face experiment
-walked up to college students and asked them if they want to help them by acting as unpaid counselors for juvenile delinquents------>NO ONE AGREED - "well then would you be willing to take a group of them on a 2 hour zoo trip" - 50% said sure, compared to only 17% in the control group
32
reciprocity norm
- we have learned to expect payback for good deeds as well as feel obligated to return one's kindness - if you do something good for someone, you want payback and if someone does something good for you you wanna repay them
33
social responsibility norm
-we feel a responsibly to help others who really need it, even though we know the favor won't be returned (INDIRECT RECIPROCITY)
34
social exchange theory
- we help when the benefits outweigh the costs - while we may not expect direct rewards, we may feel good about ourselves, be viewed more positively by others, release guilt
35
3 reasons why people are less likely to help as the number of bystanders increases
1. noticing=people tend to keep to themselves in crowds, their attention isn't as easily turned to any one person or action 2. interpreting=when others are around are around, we use them as guides for our behavior. If everyone is waiting for someone to react and no one does, people will de-emohasize the harm of the situation (smoke in the room experiment ) 3. assuming responsibility= when there are others around, people will feel less responsibly to help-"Im sure someone has already called" or "Im not really qualified to help" (seizure experiment )
36
social loafing
- the tendency of some individuals to do less work in a group than others - particularly when people feel unimportant and not responsible - FREE RIDERS
37
Social Facilitation (Zajonc)
- sometimes others bring out the best in us - typically for well learned tasks - when arousal improves performance -RUNNERS DO BETTER WHEN COMPETING THAN WHEN ALONE
38
Yerkes-Dodson inverted U
- medium arousal=high performance | - low and high arousal= eh performance
39
Zajonc and Roaches
- a roach will run faster down hall if there are other roaches present (medium arousal) - OTHERS IMPROVE PERFORMANCE - a roach will complete a complex maze more slowly when in the presence of others then when alone (high arousal ) - OTHERS HINDER PERFORMANCE
40
Impression formation kelly 1950
- sub teacher was described as "warm person...same thing " or "rather cold person...same thing" - people used central traits to categorize individuals (good vs bad) - an overall impression has been theorized to be derived from an average of the traits that person expresses - however, different traits can have different weights (subjective value to the perceiver)
41
Situational causes (external attributions)
-something about the environment must have made them act that way
42
``` Dispositional causes (internal attributions) ```
-something about them, personally, must have made them act that way
43
Fundamental Attribution Error
- when we view someones's behavior, good or bad, we tend to OVER attribute the reason to personality factors - CORRESPONDENCE BIAS: other people act in ways that corresponds to who they are - we do not account for situational factors in other people's behaviors - actually takes mental effort (some form of motivation) to account for possible situational cues (called 'correcting')
44
Inaccuracy of attributions: | self serving bias
-we like to attribute our successes to our personal, dispositional qualities-we attribute out failures to external source (and do the opposite for others) - "I got an A because I'm smart" - "i got an F bc the teacher is a jerk"
45
Inaccuracy of attributions: | Assumed similarity bias
- we overestimate the amount of similarly between ourselves and everyone else in the world - "how could someone possibly think that way" - egocentrism
46
Inaccuracy of attributions: | Halo Effect
- if you initially perceive a person to be "good," you tend to overestimate that person's positive qualities (quantity) and that those qualities generalize across situations - in attractive people ("what is beautiful is good")
47
Inaccuracy of attributions: | Just world hypothesis
-the belief that people get back from life what they deserve (karma) - good things happen to good people, bad things happen to bad people - rape ?