Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Sherif studied social influence using what phenomenon?

A

The Autokinetic effect
- These effects occur when there is a point source of light in a dark room and the light seems to move even if it is stationary
- This is because your body is moving, your head is moving and your eyes are moving.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Festinger’s theory of social comparison processes assumes that we seek to do what, how, and when?

A

This theory states that we want to evaluate ourselves and our beliefs about external reality.
- If objective criteria are available we use them.
- If not, we look to others who are similar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was different about the kind of stimuli used by Asch in comparison to that used by Sherif?

A

Compared to Sherif, Asch used stimuli that made their social influence experiment ambiguous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In the Asch experiment, when did subjects give their answers?

A

When they were alone

  • When they were alone, they gave the correct answers.
  • When they gave their answers with a group of people, they often got it wrong and went with the group answer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of errors did subjects make, and how often did they make them?

A

Errors about whether they did or didn’t give the right answer

  • On some of the trials, everyone gave the correct answer, but on other trials, the others present
    (who were confederates) all gave the wrong answer.
    • 32% of the time the subject went along with the group and gave the wrong answer.
  • When he ran the experiment with six confederates and two subjects, the subjects gave 10% wrong answers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was most important about the group that led to this effect?

A

What was important was the unanimity of the group, the fact that they all agreed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What effect did the size of the group have?

A

A larger group size did not matter however he found that once you were outnumbered two against one, there was the full effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened when the situation was reversed? This indicates the importance of what?

A
  • When it was reversed and the confederates gave the wrong answer, the others laughed and wondered what was wrong with him.
    • This indicates the importance of social support.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When subjects were the lone dissenter, many questioned what? What did others do?

A
  • When the person was alone and the rest of the group was unanimous, Asch asked subjects how they felt.
    • Some of them questioned their judgment.
    • Others felt that they were right, but went along with the group anyway and gave the wrong answer.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Kelman call each of his 3 processes of Social Influence?
(C. Id. In. )

A

Kelman suggests that there are three processes of Social Influence:
- Compliance
- Identification
- Internalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is important in accepting influence in each of Kelman’s process?

A
  • For compliance, what is important in accepting influence is to achieve rewards or avoid punishments
  • For identification, what is important in accepting influence is your identification with the person or group
  • For internalization, what is important in accepting influence is that it is consistent with your values
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does surveillance relate to Kelman’s processes?

A

Kelman notes that surveillance by the influence agent is important for compliance, but not for identification or internalization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does it mean to say that an authority is legitimate?

A

Legitimate means that the person has the socially defined right to tell you what to do.
- But that authority is usually limited to certain kinds of things the person can tell you to do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What cover story did Milgram use?

A

He stated that he was looking for volunteers for an experiment to study the effects of punishment on learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did psychiatrists predict about obedience in the Milgram experiment?
a. Were their predictions confirmed?

A

They predicted that 1/10th of 1% would obey fully.
a. No their predictions were not confirmed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What 3 factors influenced the overall amount of compliance? How was this demonstrated by Milgram?

A
    1. The salience (being aware) of the victim – Milgram varied how close the victim was
    1. The salience (being aware) of the experimenter — Milgram varied whether the experimenter left the room or was never there
    1. Group effects — Milgram had others assisting the subject
17
Q

What additional factor was studied that had little effect?

A

The Institutional context

18
Q

Did the subjects want to continue? Explain. Why did some subjects laugh?

A

Subjects laughed due to nervous tension.
No, the subjects did not want to continue.

19
Q

What did subjects have to question or challenge in order to disobey?

A

In order to disobey they had to challenge the experimenter’s authority.

20
Q

What ground could defiant subjects give for disobeying, and how does this relate to Kohlberg’s stages?

A
  • They offer to give back the money
    Stage 2 - return the exchange of favor, or
    Stage 5 - break the contract
  • They ask if something has gone wrong
    Stage 3 - remain a good subject if the experiment has already gone wrong
  • They ask who will take responsibility
    Stage 4 - law and order
21
Q

Why did Zimbardo use a mock prison instead of studying a real prison?

A
  • He decided to set up a mock prison in the basement of the psychology building at Stanford University to control pre existing influences,
  • In a real prison, you don’t know if the prisoners and guards act the way they do because of the kinds of people they were before they entered the prison
22
Q

How were the participants in the study deindividuated?

A
  • The dress and the stocking cap had the effect of de-individuating them, treating them not as individuals.
  • This was done in order to get rid of their old identity and give them a new identity of a prisoner.
  • Their name was also taken away, and they were given a number
23
Q

Did the study last as long as originally intended? Explain.

A

No it did not.
- The experiment was supposed to last two weeks, but things got out of hand two days into the experiment
- Instead the experiment lasted six days,

24
Q

How did we describe the behavior of the prisoners and guards?

A

Some of the guards were cruel and abusive, humiliating the prisoners.
- They got physical with the prisoners and made them clean toilets with their bare hands and use a bucket instead of using the bathroom.
- Prisoners acted with rebellion, however, afterwards they became submissive and passive.
- Eventually it impacted the prisoner’s emotionally; one prisoner broke down and had to be released and three others also suffered a breakdown