Social (contemporary) - Levine Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

collectivist def

A

priority given to people around you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

individualist def

A

focus given to yourself/your family

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

purchasing power parity

A

economic well being measure, of how much the average income of a country can buy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

aims (3)

A

.To see if people will offer similar levels of help across several non emergency situations
.To see if helping strangers varies across cultures
.To identify characteristics of communities who are more/less likely to help strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

research methods

A

correlation and observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

procedure

A

one student collected data in their home city over summer
3 different tasks used
student noted how many times confederate was helped/not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 conditions

A

hurt leg
dropped pen
helping blind person across street

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

hurt leg scenario

A

.confederate walked with heavy limp, wearing leg brace
.within 20ft of pedestrian, they would ‘accidentally’ drop magazines and struggle to pick them up
.helping defined as offering help or just helping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

dropped pen scenario

A

.confederate walked at moderate pace towards pedestrian
.within 10-15ft would ‘accidentally’ drop pen and not realise
.helping defined as calling back confederate or returning the pen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

blind person scenario

A

.confederate dressed in black glasses and a cane would locate pedestrian crossing
.when light turned green, they would stop and wait for help
.helping defined as minimum telling confederate the light was green

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

discarded tasks

A

.asking for change - Calcutta had no change

.asking people to post discarded letters - Tel Aviv fearful of explosives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

results - 3 most helpful

A

1) Rio, Brazil 99.33%
2) San Jose, Costa Rica 91.33%
3) Lilongwe, Malawi 86%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

results - 3 least helpful

A

21) Singapore 48%
22) New York 44.66%
23) Malaysia 40.33%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

conclusions

A

levels of helping inversely related to helping (earn more money = less help)
sympathia countries more helpful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ethics kept

A

confidentiality

p.f.h

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ethics broken

A

debrief
informed consent
withdrawal
deception

17
Q

internally reliable

A

yes - controlled e.g 20ft away dropped magazines in hurt leg scenario

18
Q

externally reliable

A

yes - 424 dropped pen
493 hurt leg
281 blind person

19
Q

internally valid

A

no - some may feel suspicious seeing same situation each day - demand characteristics
no - may be religion not culture

20
Q

population validity

A

yes - 23 countries (not ethnocentric)

no - only generalise to that city as its based off PPP

21
Q

ecologically valid

A

yes - real situations

yes - natural setting (field experiment)

22
Q

dropped pen sample

A

214 men, 210 women

23
Q

hurt leg sample

A

253 men, 240 women

24
Q

blind person sample

A

281 trials