shaky ground Flashcards
stress appraisal theory
appraisals of an event and our role in it shape our:
- EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCE of the event
- PHYSIOLOGICAL REACTIONS to the event
stress appraisal theory postulates that stress is…
stress is what happens when the demands of the situation exceed our ability to cope
ultimately, our stress level is based on the combination of the primary and secondary appraisals
primary appraisal (stress appraisal theory)
a person’s perception of the DEMANDS or CHALLENGES of a given situation
is the event positive, negative or neutral?
if negative, to what extent is it harmful, threatening for the future, or challenging?
secondary appraisal (stress appraisal theory)
a person’s perception of their ABILITY TO DEAL with the demands of a given situation
are coping abilities and resources sufficient to deal with and overcome the harm, threat, or challenge posed by the event?
(once we have determined whether a situation merits a response, we think about if we have the resources needed to handle it)
challenge versus threat reactivity
challenge reactivity = adaptive response to threat
^ blood vessels dilate, more blood pumps
threat reactivity = not adaptive (prevents efficient circulation through the body)
^ blood vessels constrict, less blood pumps
learned helplessness: repeated failure leads to…
repeated failure >
attribution to personal flaws & perception of no control >
loss of motivation
hope is more than just…
positive thinking or optimism
it combines MOTIVATION and STRATEGY to reach a goal
has two components:
1. agency
2. pathways thinking
while optimism has benefits, hope shows us that…
optimism alone isn’t enough
you have to be able to plan and strategize and figure out HOW to make things happen
optimism can lead us to underestimate what? and what is this called?
risks, costs and setbacks (planning fallacy)
tend to be particularly unrealistic when thinking about the future
3 ways to think about goals
- indulging (only fantasizing about success)
- dwelling (only focusing on negative aspects)
- mental contrasting (envisioning potential problems and creating a plan for how to overcome them)
first-year computer science STUDY RESULTS
students who practice MENTAL CONTRASTING showed the STRONGEST MOTIVATION and EFFORT
^ but ONLY if they had HIGH EXPECTATIONS of SUCCESS
^ for students with LOW EXPECTATIONS of success, mental contrasting actually DECREASED motivation and effort
students in INDULGING and DWELLING conditions…
^ felt moderately energized
^ put in moderate effort
^ received average grades regardless of how high or low their expectations were
mental contrasting works by aligning what?
EFFORT with REALITY
- if success seems likely, it boosts motivation and effort
- if success seems unlikely, it decreases motivation and effort
when people engage in counterfactual thinking, mental contrasting does what?
(counterfactual thinking = “what ifs”)
reduces disappointment, regret and resentment
reflecting on the obstacles that would’ve have to have been overcome can help people EMOTIONALLY DETACH from the unreachable goal and RE-ENGAGE/TAKE ACTION in the present
the WOOP method
Wish (choose a goal)
Outcome (imagine how outcome will make you feel)
Obstacle (identify obstacles)
Plan (develop if-then implementation plan)
autonomous motivation as a protective factor against severe action crises
pursuing goals for personal interests/values
this points you towards true north - keeps you going despite setbacks and challenges
is there any benefit to action crises?
force us to REASSESS our goals and either:
- COMMIT more fully to a goal
- DISENGAGE from a goal
(like a fork in the road moment where you really must decide what path to take)
steps to goal disengagement
- withdrawal of BEHAVIOURAL EFFORT
- DISSOLVING MOTIVATIONAL commitment
- finding an ATTRACTIVE OTHER GOAL
3 possible paths in response to an unattainable goal
- maintain effort, maintain commitment
^ potential for psych distress
- give up effort, maintain commitment
^ potential for psych distress
- give up effort, give up commitment
^ potential for psych WELLBEING
inaction crises
decisional conflict that occurs AFTER deciding to disengage from a goal
when you second guess yourself after having made the decision to quit
marked by DOUBT, REGRET, INTERNAL CONFLICT about abandoning the goal
4 reasons why it’s so hard to let go
- can threaten SELF-CONCEPT if goal is tied to one’s identity and self-worth
- sunk-cost fallacy
- concerns about social disapproval
- misjudging the goal’s attainability
when is goal disengagement adaptive?
- when it FREES UP SPACE
- when it’s replaced by ANOTHER ATTAINABLE GOAL
- when the reasons for disengagement are AUTONOMOUS
during Covid, goal re-engagement did what?
provided a buffer against declines in wellbeing (due to loss of control over valued goals during the pandemic)
RESULTS (goal disengagement among university students)
WHAT DIDN’T MATTER:
- TYPE of goal
- HOW LONG someone had been trying to let go
- HOW DIFFICULT they thought it would be to disengage
- general DISPOSITION (ie. optimism, decisiveness)
WHAT DID MATTER:
- MOTIVATION behind disengagement
^ those who disengaged for autonomous reasons experienced fewer inaction crises at T2 and T3 and made more progress by the end of the year
^ students who disengaged for controlled reasons experienced more inaction crises, leading to slower progress in actually letting go
examples of how unattainable goal-disengagement can positively impact health
- university students who disengaged from goals had FEWER HEALTH PROBLEMS and IMPROVED SLEEP
- older adults reported FEWER COMMON COLDS
- women with breast cancer had LOWER LEVELS of CRP (marker of inflammation)