Schater And Singer (185) andro Flashcards
State 1 closed q’s used to measure mood, including answer choices
- Mood = “how irritated would say you feel at present?”
- 5 choices given from “I don’t feel at all irritated’ —> ‘I feel extremely irritated’
Q: “How happy would you say you feel at present?”
- Five choices from “ I don’t feel at all happy/good —-> “I feel extremely happy/good”
State 1 q used to measure physical condition including answer choices
Physical condition
- Have you experienced any palpitation ?
- “did you feel and tremor?”
- 4 choices from “not at all” to “an intense amount”
Describe procedure in anger condition aft ppt met stooge
- told by experimenter that he would return in 20 mins
- stooge complains abt questionnare w/ statements abt it being unfair
- stooge began showing anger
- stooge makes standardized comments abt questionnare
- questions begin w/ “innocent” ones before getting more personal
- he crumples up questionnaire at the end - stomps out of room
- ppt behaviour placed into 6 categories
Describe psychological theory that was tested in study
- Psysiological + cognitive
- when someone experiences emotions/cognitions, physiological arousal happens
Identify one ethical issue raised in study
- deception/ppt decieved
- lack of informed consent
- lack of physical protection
Describe how sample was recruited
- study advertised to students who were part of ppt pool
- volunteers from psych classes at Minnesota uni
- recieve 2 extra points
Outline 1 strength of sampling technqiue
- volunteers tend to more motivated + less likley to drop out of study thus ppt more likely to agree to injection part of study
Describe 2 aims of study
- to test out how cognitive labels like anger + euphoria affect how we perceive our own emotions
- to investigate effect of stooge on behavior who would angry or euphoric
Outline whay ppt in EPI IGN told during injection
- told injection was harmless/mild
- told there were no side effects
Describe what ppt in EPI MIS were told
- told to expect some side effects from Suproxin
- side effects would last for 15-20mins
- “ypur feet will probably go numb”
- “you will get an itching sensation over your body”
Describe 2 independent variables from study
- emotional sitaution = anger/euphoria
- injection info = EPI MIS/ EPI IGN/EPI INF
Why is study ethical vs unethical
ETHICAL:
- data collected kept confidential + no individual data was published all we know is “Male students from Uni Minessota”
UNETHICAL:
- Ppt deliberatley decieved + told wrong info whilst getting injection
- told injection was Suproxin for vision
Identify 2 behaviours from ppt in euphoria condition that would be coded as ‘joins activity’
- made or flew paper airplanes
- threw paper basketballs
- hula hooped
- shooting paper with rubber band
Explain 1 methodoligical strength of this study
- study was experiemental/well controlled so cause + effect established knowing it was ‘injection information’ causing behavioural chang
- study was standardized so could be easily tested for reliability and action of stooge in anger/euphoria conditions meant that another research team would replicate/check for reliability
Suggest instructions to replicate EPI INF condition
- you must tell ppt study is abt vision
- must tell them its abt how vitamins affect vision
- you must tell them injection is mild/harmless
- reveal possibility of side effects
- tell them theyll last 15 mins or so
- tell them hand will get shaky + heart will pound
