Baron Cohen Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

One methodological problem that could arise if child ppt were used in study

A
  • children may not understand words = cannot correctly choose and identify words for emotions even with a glossary (no help)
  • reduced reliability of results/invalidity as children may guess as they understand the emotion but cannot choose the correct word to describe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

One useful application of findings if child ppts were used

A
  • eyes test could detect autism in early children = enable early treatment to help parents = NOT DIAGNOSTIC TOOL alongside DSM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe two assumptions of cog approach

A
  • behavior,emotions can be explained in terms of the role of thinking processes like attention,e memory and language
  • similarities and differences between ppl can be understood via cognitions = the way we process info/the way we store info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe how results of study can help understanding/treating autism

A
  • the AS/HFA scored signifanctly lower on ‘eyes test’ compared to other groups = group may lack TOM which can form part of AS/HFA
  • AS/HFA group scored significantly higher on AQ compared to other groups = ppl given AQ test may help diagnose ppl w AS/HFA
  • useful to understand how ppl w autism perceived
  • identifies difficulties in recognizing/understanding emotions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

One real world application based on results/conclusions by BC

A
  • As/HFA group scored signifcantly lower on eyes test = lack TOM = educators help students by giving extra support to improve TOM skills
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe what is meant by “Theroy of mind”

A
  • ability to attribute mental states to ourselves and others e.g desires,emotions etc
  • about how we use this knowledge to explain actions of others/understand others + predict actions of others
  • empathy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline how one results from thsi study supports concept of TOM

A
  • AS/HFA group had lowest mean score of any of groups = most difficulty assigning emotions/mental state to another person as predicted by TOM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Identify sampling technique used to recruit AS/HFA group

A
  • Volunteer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe how AS/HFA sample was recruited

A
  • via ads in national autistic society magazine OR support group
  • all have to be diagnosed in specialist centers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline one strength of sampling technique used to recruit AS/HFA group

A
  • volunteers tend to be more motivated = less likely to drop out of study so AS/HFA ppt more likely to complete eyes test
  • more likely to find larger sample as AS/HFA is difficult group to find so ads improved chances of this
  • they volunteered so already give informed consent to participate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the theory that Baron-Cohen et al. were testing with their ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ Test.

A
  • TOM = ability to attribute mental states to ourselves + others e.g desires, emotions
  • the person can put themselves in position of others and how we use this knowledge to explain/predict action of others
  • ppl have diff ideas/emotions to us
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Identify one problem with the original ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ Test,

A
  • forced choice of 2 items
  • basic and complex mental states
  • more female pairs of eyes than male/gynocentric
  • target and foil were semantic opposites
  • narrow range of total scores./ ceiling effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain how one finding from BC eyes test supports one assumption of cognitive approach

A
  • AS/HFA scored much lower on eyes test compare t to control = difference between groups explained by cognitions/thinking processes like TOM
  • AS/HFA scored much lower on eyes test compared to control = difference between ppl can be explained via cognitions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe 2 ways study was valid

A
  • impt controls between 2 conditions e.g glossary to ensure comphremenhsion
  • 2 control groups =1 matched for IQ so intelligence wouldn’t effect reuslts in relation to comparing
  • standerdized procedure = all judged 36 q’s + practice question AND static, b+w, 4 options to choose from 3 mental states = easier comparison across 3 groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe one way study was NOT valid

A
  • eyes test may NOT measure TOM = may j be test of measuring pics to words
  • in reality, emotions judged more than only eyes e.g posture/tone
  • eyes not static, ppls eyes move so emotions easier to judge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe one control condition (group2)

A

-students at Cambridge assumed high IQ
- normal adults from general population of Exter/CBG
- IQ matched group = known IQ matched to autistic group

17
Q

OG Eyes test had 3 problems how were they resolved

A
  • 36 pairs of eyes use
  • 4 response options to choose from (3 w similar valence emotion)
  • glossary provided = better comprhension
18
Q

Real world application on eyes test

A
  • eyes test can be used to diagnose autism alongside DSM/ICD criteria= indicates lack of TOM so person can seek support to improve direction of emotions
  • eyes test can be used to help autistic adults teaching them how to read emotions in eyes by using test w/ helper
19
Q

2 characteristics of sample in group 3

A
  • 20.8 years
  • STUDENTS undergad at cambridge
  • assumed to have high IQ
  • NON AS/HFA
20
Q

Aim

A
  • to test ppl on revised eyes test to see if some original deficits were no longer seen
  • to see if females would score higher on eyes test compared to males
  • to see if people with AS/HFA lack TOM + perfrom less well eyes test
21
Q

Describe results for AQ test for 2 groups of ppt

A
  • AS/HFA group scored highest compared to students/IQ matched controls
22
Q

Describe how target words + foils were devloped for revised eyes test

A
  • piloted on 8 judges
  • at least 5/8 judges had to agree target word was MOST suitable
  • items that failed had new target words/foils created
  • no more than 2/8 judges had to pick the foil
23
Q

2 characteritics of sample in Group 1

A
  • 15 diagnosed w/ AS/HFA
  • ALL male
  • same educational levels as G2
  • volunteer
  • ads in National autistic society magzine
24
Q

Conclsuions

A
  • Revised eyes test overcame problems of OG version os valid test of social intelligence in adults
  • Ppl w/ autism have difficulties w/ TOM as they cannot see perspective of other ppl
25
Q

Describe how ppt recruited for G2 + G3

A

ALL -volunteer sampling/opportunity

G2:
- from classes in Exeter
- from public libraries Cambridge

G3:
- Undergrad students Cambridge
- all students had performed well in A level

26
Q

1 methodlogical strength of study

A
  • revised eyes test follows standardized procedure + all ppt had same 36 pairs of eyes to judge so direct comparisons could be made across groups
27
Q

Ethical weakness of study

A
  • ppt especially AS/HFA may feel psychological distress + may not understand emotions in eyes which could be stressful
28
Q

Name the test being revised

A

Reading the mind in the eyes test

29
Q

3 features of sample used for G4

A
  • random sample
  • general population
  • not diagnosed w/ AS/HFA
  • IQ matched w/ group 1
30
Q

Explain why this test may innacuratlye meausre attribution of mental state

A
  • pics were static + when attributing mental states we see facial expression but also body language/tone to gauge mental states IRL