Sahih Flashcards
What is the linguistic meaning of Sahih?
Opposite of sick. In reality, it takes place in within the body. But metaphorically, in within the hadith and other meanings.
What is the technical meaning of Sahih?
When the sanad is linked by a just accurate narrator from the beginning to the end, without any rarity or defect.
What are the 5 conditions of Sahih?
1: The linking of the sanad. The understanding of it is that every narrator from amongst the narrators has taken it (narration) directly from the narrator above him, from the beginning of the sanad to the end.
2: The justness of the narrator. Every narrator from amongst the narrators has been described to be muslim, mature, sane, not an open sinner and not be deprived of good character.
3: The accuracy of the narrator. Every narrator from amongst the narrators is of complete accuracy, whether it be accuracy of the heart (memory), of preserving in within the heart, or whether it be accuracy by writing.
4: Not having rarity in it. The hadith should not be rare, and this rarity is the trustworthy narrator contradicts that narrator who is more trustworthy than him.
5: Having no defects: So that the hadith should not have any deficiency. And the deficiency is a hidden, concealed cause which makes an impact on the authenticity of the hadith, even though the apparent side is sound from it.
What happens if there is a shortcoming in the narrator regarding these 5 conditions?
And if there is a shortcoming of one condition from amongst the 5 conditions, then the hadith in that case will not be known as sahih.
What is the ruling regarding a Sahih hadith?
The hukum of it will be wajib to act upon by the agreement of the people of hadith. And also by those usooliyeen and fuqaha who are considered (throughout the world, like the 4 imams).
Then it will become an evidence from amongst evidences of shari’ah.
A muslim will not be given the room to leave out acting upon it.
What is the intended purpose of them saying this hadith is sahih?
He means that the 5 past conditions surely have been established in within the hadith. Not on the basis that this hadith is certain in within its correctness in the actual matter.
Even within a trustworthy narrator, there is a possibility of mistake and forgetfulness.
What is the intended purpose of them saying this hadith is not sahih?
They mean that some or all of the previous 5 conditions of sahih have not been established (fully) in within the hadith. They dont mean that he is a liar in the actual matter.
Since it is possible for someone who errs often to narrate correctly or to come to the right understanding.
Can it be said with certainty in regards to any sanad (chain of narrators) that this is the most correct sanad unrestrictedly?
The most preferred qawl in this matter in any chain of narration, it cannot be said with certainty unrestrictedly because the ranks of authenticity vary based upon how firmly the 5 conditions of sahih are established within the sanad.
Because rarely does a sanad satisfy all the conditions at the very highest level.
So it is more preferable to refrain from placing any hukm to any sanad that it is the most sahih sanad unrestrictedly.
Despite this, it has still been reported from some Imams that some statements have been reported from sahih sanad and it’s apparent that every Imam gave preference to whatever was stronger according to him.
What were the 1st publications in regarding only sahih ahadith?
The 1st publication in regarding only sahih narrrations is Sahih Bukhari, then Sahih Muslim and these 2 are the most sahih after The Qur’an.
And the ummah has agreed upon embracing these 2 books by accepting this.
Which one is more sahih?
And Imam Bukhari’s Sahih Bukhari is the most sahih from both of them and gives more benefits due to the fact they are stronger in linking and more trustworthy of narrators. And because within Sahih Bukhari, many fiqi matters/issues have been derived.
And it has points of wisdom within it (Sahih Bukhari). That is not found in within Sahih Muslim.
Taking all of this into consideration, Sahih Bukhari is more sahih than Sahih Muslim.
Otherwise some ahadith are found in Sahih Muslim which are stronger than some hadiths in Sahih Bukhari.
And it has been said: ‘Sahih Muslim is more sahih and the first saying is more correct i.e Sahih Bukhari’.
Did both of them (Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim) cover all the sahih ahadiths or preserve all the sahih?
They did not cover all the sahih Ahadith in Bukhari and Muslim, nor preserve all the sahih ahadith in their books. Surely Imam Bukhari (r.h) has said: ‘I did not include in my kitaab (Jami’ Bukhari) except what is sahih, and I left out many sahih, not to make the situation long’.
And Imam Muslim (r.h) says: ‘Not every hadith which is sahih according to me, I have placed in here. I only placed in here what everybody agreed to (that they are sahih).
Did many or a small amount of sahih ahadith pass by them (Imam Muslim and Imam Bukhari)?
Hafiz ibn Akhram states: ‘Only a small amount passed by them’. But this statement has been rejected.
The correct statement is that a lot passed by them.
It has been narrated from Imam Bukhari (r.h) that he said: ‘Many sahih ahadith were left out by me’ and Imam Bukhari (r.h) also says: ‘I have memorized 100,000 sahih ahadith and have also memorized 200,000 ghair sahih ahadith.
What is the number of ahadith from each one of them (Imam Muslim and Imam Bukhari)?
Bukhari (r.h) : 7275 (with repetition). 4000 without repetition.
Muslim (r.h) : 12000 with repetition 4000 without repetition.
Where are we going to find the remaining sahih ahadith, the ones which Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim missed out?
‘Sahih ibn Khuzaima’
‘Sahih ibn Haban’
‘Mustadrak al Hakim’
‘As sunan ul arba’a’
‘Sunan adariqutnee’
‘Sunan al bayhaqi’
Ghair sahih and sahih ahadith also in these books and sahih ahadith coming in other books as well.
Why is it appropriate to do Mustadrak (grading) on Mustadrak Hakim?
The author has mentioned in within it those sahih ahadith which are upon the conditions of shaykayn (Imam Muslim and Imam Bukhari) or upon the (understanding of the) condition of one of them. Yet they did not derive that hadith.
Likewise, he mentioned those sahih ahadith according to him, even though it does not go upon the condition of anyone of them.
Intending them to be with an authentic/correct chain.
Certain times he mentions some hadith which are not sahih. However, he indicates upon it (conditions of sahih).
Therefore, it is appropriate to examine it (hadith) and to grade ahadith of it (mustadrak) which befit its status.