Resistance to Social Influence Flashcards
what is resistance to social influence
the ability to withstand social pressures to conform
what are the two explanations for resisting social influence
- social support
- locus of control (LoC)
what is social support
the presence of people who resist pressure to conform or obey can help others to do the same
what is locus of control
- the sense we each have about what directs events in our life
how does social support lead to someone resisting conformity
- the presence of another person who doesnt conform acts as a model
- this gives the individual more confidence to reject the views of the majority aswell
explain research that supports the role of social support in resisting conformity
asch
- in one of his variations he found that an ally leads to lower levels of confomity
- he instructed one confederate to give the right answer
- conformity went from 36.5% to 5%
how does social support lead to someone resiting obedienbce
- the disobedient individuals act as role models
explain research which supports the role of social support in resisting obedience
milgram
- the real participant was teamed with two other supposed participants
- one of them announced they would stop after 150 volts and the other refused at 210 volts
- obedience dropped from 65% to 10%
what are the two types of locus of control
- internal
- external
explain internal locus of control
believe they have strong control over events in their life and take responsibility for their actions
explain external locus of control
believe events are caused by other forces such as luck or fate
how does LoC affect people comforming and obeying
- people with an external LoC are more likely to obey and conform
how does LoC influence resistance
- high internals seek out information so rely less on other people
- they have confidence
explain a study that supports the idea of locus of control
avtgis
- meta anyalysis of studies involving LoC and resisting conformity
- found individuals with an internal LoC were less persuadable and less likely to conform
- aupporting the idea that differences in LoC is linked to the differences in ability to resist social influence
explain a study that discredits the locus of control theory
twenge et al
- meta analysis comparing young perople between 1960 and 2002
- found pople have become more resistant to obedience but mre external
- this goes against locus of control as you would expect the opposite
strength
give a PEELH for social support
conformity
- P - research support for recistance to conformity
- Eg - asch did a variation of hgis study where he included a disenter that went against the majority. conformity dropped from 36.8% to 5.5%
- Ex - this suggests the prrsence of soemone who resists the poressures to cofnorm helpos others do the same, acting as a model
- L - this supportys the soaiucl support theory providing validity for the theory
- H - aschs study was done in an artififical setting using a trivial task so the findings may lack ecological validity
strength
give a PEELH for social support
obedience
- P - rresearch support for resisitng obedience
- Eg - milgram did a variation of his study where the real participant was matched with two fake participants.. one stopped at 150V and the other at 210V. obedience dropped from 65% to 10%
- Ex - the presence of other people disobeying gave the participant confidence to reset themselves
- L - this strengthens the idea that social support plays a key role in helping inidivioduals resist socialm influence
- H - the setting was highly controlled so the finding may not reflect how people resist authority in real life
strength
give a PEELH for Locus of control
- P - supporting evidence
- Eg - avtgis et al conducted a meta analysis comparing studies involcing locus of control and resisitingh conformity. it was found those with an internal LOC where less persuadable and less likely to conform
- Ex - thios supports the idea that those who see themselves as in control of their own behaviour are more confident, making them more resitant to social pressure
- L - this increases the validity of the thoery
- H - a meta analysis relies on the quality of the included sturies whioch may vary in methodology or control
limitation
give a PEELH for Locus of control
- P - discrediting evidence
- Eg - twenge et al conducted a meta analysis comapring young people between 1960 and 2002. he found that people are becoming more external yet more resistant to obedience
- Ex - this challenges the idea that an internal locus of control is necessary for resistance to social influence
- L - this raises questions about the universality of the theory, suggesting other factors may contribute to resistenmce to social influence
- H - this may be due to societal cganges rather than a direct contradiction of the LOC theory