Research Methids : Controlling Variables Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What’s the relationship between control and realism in experiments?

A

The higher the realism, the lower the control and vice versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cyclical process

A

Where findings found in the lab are consistent with those found in a natural environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mundane realism

A

When the test represents a real-life situation, threatens external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Experimental realism

A

When the test feels real to the participant, threatens internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Extraneous variables

A

Variables that may affect the IV but aren’t being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Confounding variables

A

Variables that aren’t the IV that have an affect of the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Uncontrolled variables

A

Variables that can’t be controlled (become confounding variables)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are demand characteristics?

A

Any clue that could be interpreted by the Ps as revealing the aim of the investigation, leading to Ps changing their behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

‘Please you’ affect

A

Ps may try to please the researcher the by doing what they think is expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

‘Screw you’ effect

A

Ps may try to disrupt the results by doing the opposite of what they think is expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cues resulting in demand characteristics

A

• communication during the study (instructions, rules, clues from non-verbal communication)
• what the P may have heard about the study (from other Ps)
• the way P was approached/ asked to volunteer
• type of person researcher is (personality)
• setting of the study
• other Ps characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are investigator effects?

A

Where a researcher (consciously or unconsciously) acts in a way to support their prediction. Can be a problem when observing events that can be interpreted in more than one way - leads to the Ps fulfilling investigators expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Indirect effects

A

Where the investigator operationalises the measurement of variables in such a way that the desired results are more likely - ’loose’ procedure effect’ is where an investigator may not clearly state the standardised instructions properly which leaves room for manipulation/interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Situational confounding variable

A

Features of the environment that could have an effect on the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Participant confounding variable

A

Characteristics of the participants that may have an effect on the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Direct effects

A

Physical things the researcher could do to get their desired result

17
Q

What’s random allocation?

A

Randomly assigning Ps to conditions to reduce bias
- controls for participant variables

18
Q

What’s a standardised procedure?

A

Keeping EVs constant across all conditions (allows for replication)
- controls for situational variables

19
Q

What’s randomisation?

A

Where each P group carries out the experiment stimuli in a random order
- controls for order effects

20
Q

What’s a single blind test?

A

Where Ps don’t know which condition of a study they’re in (real or placebo)
- controls for demand characteristics

21
Q

What’s a double blind test?

A

Where neither Ps nor researchers know which condition the Ps are in (real or placebo)
- controls for demand characteristics and researcher bias