Psychometric Theory & Factor Analysis Flashcards

1
Q

TRAIT IDENTIFICATION/MEASUREMENT

A
  • can be used in combo:
    LEXICAL APPROACH
  • all relevant dimensions of personality exist in natural language
    THEORETICAL APPROACH
  • start w/theory which guides selection of terms/question formation
    PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
  • statistical approach; use factor analysis to guide selection of terms/questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

THE ESSENTIAL TRAIT APPROACH

A
  • attempts to reduce large trait numbers to a few traits essential to understanding personality
  • goal = find smallest trait number by which individual difs in personality can be adequately described
  • underpinned by psychometric theory/factor analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY

A
  • psychometrics refers to theory/methods of psychological measurement
  • psychometrics includes IQ testing/measurement of personality traits/vocational testing
  • impact of individual testing and in wider society = substantial so it is important to have high professional standards for the development/administration/tests of interpretation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FACTOR ANALYSIS

A
  • lies at psychometrics heart
  • statistical method that allows a lot of data to be reduced to few important factors
  • developed by Spearman at beginning of 20th century for the analysis of psychometric data in abilities field
  • statistical technique used by Eysench/Cattell; eventually results in Big 5
  • many disagreements between dif theorists = result of difs in factor analysis use; important to have understanding of technique
  • cornerstone of factor analysis = correlation concept
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FACTOR ANALYSIS: BRIEF SUMMARY PROCESS I

A
  • measure large number of people in various ways using numerous items/qs
  • correlate scores on each measure w/scores on every other measure (correlation matrix)
  • determine how many factors (traits) need to be hypothesised to account for various clusters of inter-correlations
  • when items show high correlation w/one another they are thought to measure same ability/characteristic (factor/trait)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FACTOR ANALYSIS: CONCEPTUAL MODEL

A
  • FA uses correlations among many items to identify factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FACTOR ANALYSIS: BRIEF SUMMARY PROCESS II

A
  • subjectively decide the meaning of each factor/label it
  • label should reflect meaning of items that cluster together to make the factor
  • standardise personality measure; test measure on hundreds of people representative of population you’d want to measure
  • analyse responses/develop norms; all future scores assessed against these norms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EYSENCK’S HIERARCHICAL (PEN) MODEL OF PERSONALITY

A
  • Eysenck personality can be described using 3 dimensions:
    1. His theory identifies 3 second-order factors (super-traits) derived from inter-correlations between source traits.
    2. Super-traits are broad traits that subsume large surface number/narrow traits.
    3. Eysenck’s personality model based on 3 super-traits; often referred to by acronym PEN.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

PEN

A

PSYCHOTICISM
- tendency towards psychotic/sociopathic beh
EXTRAVERSION VS INTROVERSION
- high extroversion = low cortisol arousal levels
NEUROTICISIM VS EMOTIONAL STABILITY
- high neuroticism levels = excessive activity of autonomous nervous system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE OF EXTRAVERSION-INTROVERSION (E)

A

LEVEL 1
- super-trait
LEVEL 2
- narrow/subordinate traits (ie. sociable/lively/active/assertive/dominant/carefree/surgent/venturesome/sensation-seeking)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT: RELIABILITY

A
  • all tests should have norms BUT still doesn’t guarantee a reliable/valid test
  • before using any standardised test we need to examine reliability/validity
  • test = good reliability w/consistent measuring
  • reliability = 2 distinct meanings:
    1. TEST-RETEST RELAIBILITY
  • stability over time/repeatability
    2. INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
  • whether all items are measuring same thing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

TEST RE-TEST

A
  • test-retest reliability = correlates scores from large pps set who take test on at least 2 occasions
  • .8 correlation = minimum for test-retest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

TEST-RETEST: AFFECTING FACTORS

A
  • subjects characteristics (ie. ill/tired/upset)
  • characteristics in test (ie. poor test instruction/complex responses/subjective scoring/guessing)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

TEST-RETEST: DISTORTING FACTORS

A
  • time gap (at least 3 months)
  • difficulty levels of items
  • subject sampling (representative of the relevant population)
  • samples size (at least 100)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

INTERNAL CONSISTENCY

A
  • internal consistency = all items must measure same thing/capture breadth of concept
  • best internal consistency index = Cronbach’s Alpha
  • reliability = NEVER below .7
  • very high alphas = “bloated specifics” (.9+); test too narrow/specific to be valid
  • low alphas = items compromising scale probably measuring dif concepts
  • very high/low internal consistency reduces test validity; either items = too specific to capture concept breath/items so diverse they aren’t measuring anything coherent
  • valid test = ^ internal consistency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT: VALIDITY

A
  • validity = extent to which test measures what it’s designed to
  • personality tests attempt to measure hypothetical constructs (ie. IQ/social anxiety/self esteem/extraversion)
  • hypothetical constructs describe concept w/o physical reality ie. we can’t “see” extraversion; we see/measure behs suggesting extraversion BUT concept remains theoretical
  • construct validity MUST be shown
17
Q

CONSTRUCT VALIDITY TYPES

A

FACE VALIDITY
CONTENT VALIDITY
CONCURRENT VALIDITY
DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY
PREDICTIVE VALIDITY

18
Q

FACE VALIDITY

A
  • look at test items; do the items appear to be measuring the construct?
19
Q

CONTENT VALIDITY

A
  • concerned w/test’s ability to include/represent all the content of a particular construct
20
Q

CONCURRENT VALIDITY

A
  • congruent/convergent validity
  • extent to which scores from test correlate w/other measures of same construct
21
Q

DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY

A
  • flip side of coin from concurrent validity
  • refers to extent to which test score does not correlate w/scores of theoretically unrelated measures
22
Q

PREDICTIVE VALIDITY

A
  • for a test to be a valid screening device for some future beh it MUST have predictive validity
23
Q

PSYCHOMETRICS: STRENGTHS

A
  • objective/scientific way of describing people/their beh
  • tests are usually easy to administer
  • can quickly gather lots of quantitative data for statistical analysis
24
Q

PSYCHOMETRICS: WEAKNESSES

A
  • constructing valid/reliable tests = very difficult
  • tests usually contain culture bias (esp. IQ tests)
  • the very act of measuring something makes it exist as concept; IQ = what IQ tests measure