Personality Disorders Flashcards
ABNORMAL: STATISTICALLY
- stat definition = ^ simplistic
- whatever is dif from normal = abnormal
- can be statistically determined how often something occur; abnormal when rare
ABNORMAL: SOCIAL
- define abnormal according to society tolerance
- beh deemed socially acceptable = abnormal
- socially unacceptable in 1 society may be acceptable in another; reflects dif way of life/orientation
ABNORMAL: EVALUATION
- stat/social approaches suffer from changing social/cultural norms over time/between cultures
- beh thought offensive/socially inappropriate in past = acceptable today (ie. homosexuality)
- stat definitions need further caution as “rare” NOT abnormal ie. ^ IQ = statistically rare; could be abnormal BUT desirable
ABNORMAL: BROADER APPROACH
- given issues w/statistical/social approaches, broader approach = needed
- abnormal beh definition considers psych criteria + stat/social aspects ie:
- distress levels/functioning impairment/subjective feelings/emotional effect/thought patterns
METHODS OF ASSESSING PERSONALITY DISORDERS: SCID
- Structured Clinical Interview (SCID); 3 versions BUT only SCID-5-PD (Personality Disorders) = applicable here
- used to diagnose PD categorically (present/absent)/dimensionally
- SCID-5-PD = updated SCID for DSM-5 Axis II PD (SCID-II); designed to assess 10 DSM-5 PDs across A/B/C Clusters
METHODS OF ASSESSING PERSONALITY DISORDERS: CLINICAL ASSESSMENT
- clinical observations by qualified professionals
- may be corroborated by additional info from self-reported experiences/beh/peer observations
- self-report scales also used to diagnose PD:
1. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
2. Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (Revised PDQ-R) - ask whether people experience disorder signs
TYPE VS TRAIT/DIMENSIONAL APPROACH
LIVESLEY ET AL (1998)
- diagnostic systems use disorder categories to describe people BUT evidence suggests dimensional approach to PD = ^ appropriate
TYPE/CATEGORIAL APPROACH
- person diagnosed w/disorder or not
- qualitative break between people w/w/o PD
TRAIT/DIMENSIONAL APPROACH
- each disorder viewed as continuum ranging from normality-severe disturbance
- people w/disorder dif in degree only from those w/o disorder
MOREY ET AL (2000) - diverse methodology range research supports it
TRULL & DURRETT (2005) - PD = one extreme; normal = same continuum
FLETT (2007) - PD = extremes of characteristics we already have OTHER THAN psychopathy (Skilling et al (2002))
PERSONALITY DISORDER
- extreme/severe disturbance in overall character/behs of individual; affects various personality aspects
MALTLBT EY AL (2010) - always involves personal/social disruption; affects person & those around them
PARIS (2003) - disruption present over life; some symptoms develop in childhood
PERSONALITY DISORDERS: CHARACTERISTICS
- early life onset; lifelong issue
- most reluctant to ask for/accept help
- challenging to therapist; unresponsive to input
- referred by family/friends/colleagues
- difficult to treat
PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS/MENTAL ILLNESS: CHARACTERISTICS
- clear start/onset
- clear recovery trajectory
- oft associated w/cause in environment (ie. bereavement/job loss)
- seek therapy; work w/therapist to recover
PD VS PSYCH D
KENDELL (2002)
- distinction ^ challenged
- tenuous divide; overlap w/symptoms
- recent moves towards trait approach recognises PD lie on continuum/represent extreme common trait ends
- DSM-4 revised; DSM-5 recognises further research examining PD = continuous traits > absolute categories need
- hierarchical model/Axis 3 drives research > diagnosis
LABELLING
- mentioning PD diagnosis = powerful effect on clinician’s views
- vital for PD concepts to refer to real entities
APPLEBY (1988)
APPLEBY (1988)
- receiving PD label effect observed by psychiatrists
- 1/6 vignettes sent to 240 practicing psychiatrists
- 1 mentioned patient diagnosed w/PD
- rate patient against statement number
- large effect; judgements ALWAYS less favourable
APPLEBY (1988): PD CLINCIAN’S VIEWS
- manipulate admission
- overdose for attention
- NOT suicide risk
- unwanted in doctors clinic
- annoying
- unlikely to improve
- NOT mentally ill; unlikely to warrant NHS time
- not suitable for anti-depressants
- unlikely to comply w/treatment
- in debt of own fault
- management problem
APPLEBY (1988): RESULTS
- just mentioning PD diagnoses powerfully affects clinicians views
- pervasive PD nature/widely accepted belief in limited treatment effectiveness -> development/management emphasis > aetiology/treatment
LABELLING & CRIME/JUSTICE
- stigma/discrimination resulting from PD/psych D diagnosis highlights evidence based diagnosis importance
- further highlighted as evidence suggests relationships between some PD/criminal beh
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS: ICD-11
- 11th revised International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems adopted by 72nd World Health Assembly (2019)
- info effect January 2022; WHO may use ICD-10 until then
- PD section completely overhauled; just 1PD diagnosis based on severity
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS: DSM-5
- Diagnostic/Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)
- taxonomic/diagnostic tool published by APA; used by mental health professionals in USA/UK
- 10 PD categories
- DSM-5 Alternative PD Model (AMPD) = further research trait model
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS: DSM-5
- Diagnostic/Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)
- taxonomic/diagnostic tool published by APA; used by mental health professionals in USA/UK
- 10 PD categories
- DSM-5 Alternative PD Model (AMPD) = further research trait model
ICD-11
- moving away from categorical typology approach > making primary PD classification 1/5 severity lvls
SEVERITY - 3 lvls: mild/moderate/severe PD
PROMINANT TRAIT QUALIFIER - negative affectivity/detachment/disinhibition/dissociality/anankastia (rigid perfectionism; emotional/beh constraint)