Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

PERSONALITY

A
  • from Latin “persona” (mask)
    FUNDER (2004)
  • individual’s characteristic patterns of thought/emotion/behaviour together w/psychological mechanisms (hidden/not) behind the patterns
    BURGER (2004)
  • consistent beh patterns/intrapersonal processes originating within individual
  • AKA. attempts to capture/summarise individual’s “essence”/that which is consistent across situations/time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES

A
  • cornerstone in modern psych
  • people vary on psychological attribute range
  • variation = consistent across time/situations
  • possible to measure/assess individual difs
  • people classified according to personality characteristics/IQ
  • individual difs = useful for explaining/predicting beh/performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (COMPLEX)

A
  • search for broad generalisations/laws of beh omits extraordinary human beh diversity aka. individual difs
  • study of individual difs examines ways in which people = psychologically similar/dif
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PHRENOLOGY

A

FRANZ GALL (1758-1828)
- lumps/bumps on skull reveal character traits/mental abilities
- proposed MP selection based on phrenology
- today various brain parts have particular functions; this is an OUTDATED theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MODERN PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY

A
  • 2 main types:
    1. SCIENTIFIC PSYCHOLOGY
  • trait approaches/behaviourists/SLT
    2. CLINICAL PSYCHLOGY
  • psychoanalysts/humanists/existentialists
  • each spawned dif personality theories/assessment/measurement methods
  • both strive to understand ways in which people = psychologically similar/dif
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SIX PARADIGMS/APPROACHES TO PERSONALITY

A
  1. THE PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH
  2. THE TRAIT APPROACH
  3. THE BIOLOGICAL/EVOLUTIONARY APPROACHES
  4. THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL/HUMANISTIC APPROACH
  5. THE LEARNING APPROACH (BEHAVIOURISM/SLT)
  6. THE COGNITIVE APPROACH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

THE PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH (SHORT)

A
  • unconscious mind/motivations
  • resolving internal conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

THE TRAIT APPROACH (SHORT)

A
  • how people dif
  • conceptualising/measuring difs
  • continuum of traits/beh
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

THE BIOLOGICAL/EVOLUTIONARY APPROACHES (SHORT)

A
  • anatomy
  • physiology
  • inheritance
  • evolution
  • inherited predispositions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL/HUMANISTIC APPROACH (SHORT)

A
  • conscious experience of the world
  • personal responsibility
  • self acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

THE LEARNING APPROACH (BEHAVIOURISM/SOCIAL LEARNING THEORIES) (SHORT)

A
  • behaviourism
  • SLT
  • cognitive personality theory
  • learning helps adapt to their beh via rewards/punishments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

THE COGNITIVE APPROACH (SHORT)

A
  • role of perception/memory
  • dif ways people process info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

WHY SO MANY THEORIES?

A
  • theory originators hold dif philosophical assumptions/paradigms about people
  • theories oft incompatible
  • dif theories address dif qs
  • each approach has interesting/useful things to say about human personality BUT all incomplete
  • ergo we can’t come up with one big theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

PHILOSOPHICAL ASSUMPTIONS

A
  • dif philosophical assumptions profoundly influence how we perceive/theories about the world ie:
  • freedom VS determinism
  • hereditary VS environmental
  • uniqueness/idiographic VS universality/nomothetic
  • proactive VS pessimistic
  • conscious VS unconscious
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

EVALUATING PHILOSOPHICAL ASSUMPTIONS

A

COHERENCE
- is the position clear/logical/consistent?
RELEVANCE
- does theory deal w/issues important/meaningful today? are they compatible w/empirical reality?
COMPREHENSIVENESS
- does it encompass wide phenomena array? does it cover what it claims profoundly/superficially?
COMPELLINGNESS
- does it convince YOU?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

WHAT MAKES A USEFUL THEORY

A
  1. Generates hypotheses/research
  2. Falsifiable
  3. Organises/integrates existing data/empirical knowledge
  4. Suggests practical answers to everyday issues
  5. Internal consistency
  6. Simplicity/parsimony
17
Q

PERSONALITY & CULTURE

A
  • personalities exist in cultural context
  • identifying cultural limitations/universality of personality measures gives deeper insight into concept nature
  • such cultures include:
    INDIVIDUALISTIC
    COLLECTIVIST
18
Q

INDIVIDUALISTIC CULTURES

A
  • most northern european counties/USA
  • emphasis individual needs/accomplishments
  • “I” orientation tendency
  • great value on autonomy/youth/equality/individual security
19
Q

COLLECTIVIST CULTURES

A
  • many asian/african/south american countries
  • emphasise cooperation > competition/group > individual accomplishments
  • “we” orientation tendency
  • great value on duty/tradition/age/hierarchy/group security
20
Q

THE PERSON-SITUATION DEBATE

A

WALTER MISHCELL (1968): PERSONALITY & ASSESSMENT
- strongly contested since late 1960s
- Q: is the person/situation ^ important in determining what people do?
- situational variables best suited to predicting behaviour in specific situations
- personality traits predict beh patterns that persist across situations/time

21
Q

THE FORER/BARNUM EFFECT: DESCRIPTION

A

FORER (1948)
- people tend to accept vague/general personality descriptions as uniquely applicable to them
- they accept questionable/sometimes false statements about them if they’re deemed positive/flattering enough

22
Q

THE FORER/BARNUM EFFECT: IN ACTION

A

FORER (1948)
- asked students to evaluate personality description 0-5 (5 = excellent; 4 = good)
- personality description accuracy amazed pps
- class average evaluation = 4.26
- test repeated hundred times w/psych students; average still 4.2
- pseudoscience = tart/astrology/fortune telling
- personality theories/assessments MUST be specific/reliable

23
Q

THE PSYCHOMETRIC APPROACH

A
  • psychometrics = theory/methods of psychological measurement (underpin trait approaches)
  • include IQ testing/personality traits measurement/vocational testing
  • testing impact on individual/in wider society = substantial; highlights high professional standard importance for test development/administration/interpretation