Problem Gambling Flashcards

1
Q

Requirements for getting diagnosed with a gambling disorder

A
  • At least 4 of the following 9 criteria:
    • Pre-occupied with gambling
    • Needs to gamble with increasing amounts (tolerance)
    • Repeated attempts to reduce or quit gambling
    • Restless or irritable when attempting to stop gambling (withdrawal)
    • Gambles as means of escape or to alleviate low mood
    • Frequently returns to get even (loss chasing)
    • Lies to conceal involvement
    • Jeopardised / lost relationship or job due to gambling
    • Forced to borrow money due to gambling debt
  • Not better explained by manic episode
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

all gambling disorder criterion items are not equal: examples

A
  • Ex. Loss chasing is too sensitive, and too many non-problem gamblers endorse it
  • Ex. Illegal acts (which has now been dropped) is insensitive, and is only endorsed by gamblers who already meet diagnosis
  • Ex. Withdrawal symptoms is just right
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

research on withdrawal

A
  • Wray and Dickerson (1981) found psychological withdrawal symptoms from gambling were common
  • Rosenthal and Lesieur (1992) found 2/3 gamblers reported more than 1 somatic withdrawal symptom
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

evidence for re-classification

A
  • DSM-5 task force cited 5 lines of evidence that make people with gambling addiction look like people with substance abuse disorders:
    • Symptom hallmarks (withdrawal, tolerance)
    • Comorbidities
    • Shared heritability/genetics
    • Neuroimaging/neurocognitive similarities
    • Effective treatments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

assessments of problem gambling

A
  • DSM diagnosis involves a face-to-face interview with a clinician
  • We need short, self-report instruments for problem gambling:
  • ex. South Oaks Gambling Screen
  • ex. Problem gambling severity index
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

South Oaks gambling screen

A
  • Based on DSM-III
  • Probable pathological gambling score >5
  • Uses lifetime statements (“have you ever…”)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Problem gambling severity index

A
  • Becoming “gold standard” measure
  • Just asks about the last year of your life (“In the past 12 months…”)
  • Uses rankings from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always), total scores
    • 1-2 = low-risk
    • 3-7 = moderate risk
    • 8+ = problem gambling
  • Limitation: very reliant on money –> time could also be an indicator of problem gambling
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

prevalence data: worldwide

A
  • Problem gamblers (those who don’t quite meet threshold for psychiatric diagnosis) tend to be about 3-4% of population worldwide
  • Pathological gamblers tend to be 1-3% of population worldwide
  • However, Australia’s rates are higher
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

accessibility vs. adaptation

A
  • As gambling access increases, rates of problem gambling typically rise –> “accessibility”
  • But in Canada, rates are now dropping –> is society adapting to gambling expansion and increased availability?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

gambling regulation and gambling harms

A
  • A “sweet spot” exists between prohibiting gambling and unregulated expansion –> regulation can typically keep harms under control
  • The U-shaped curve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Prevalence data: British Columbia

A
  • 72.5% of British Columbians gamble
  • 61% of people who’ve gambled in the last year are classified (based on PGSI) as non-problem
  • 27% are non-gamblers
  • 8% are low-risk problem gamblers
  • 3% are moderate problem gamblers
  • 1% are high-risk problem gamblers
  • 2008 prevalence survey showed 4.6% problem gamblers, so rate of PG may have dropped
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

demographic predictors of gambling in prevalence surveys

A
  • problem gamblers more like to be:
    • male
    • younger age
    • lower SES
    • belong to ethnic minority (ie. First Nations)
    • experience other mental health problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

comorbidity and problem gambling

A
  • Pathological gambling 0.6%
  • People with 1+ symptom of problem gambling 2.3%
  • Substance use disorders, anxiety disorders, mood disorders most prevalent in this populations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

temporal ordering

A

Anxiety & Mood Disorders often occur before the gambling problem -> Gambling to cope / escape negative emotions?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

age when gambling started

A
  • Problem gamblers tend to be involved in gambling much earlier than everyone else –> often during teenage years
    • Before age 21 (legal US age), 80% of problem gamblers have already started
  • Gambling Disorder – as well as drug addictions – can be regarded as developmental disorders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

genes or environment? Results of Vietnam war veteran twin study

A
  • 1.4% had problem gambling; 6% had subclinical levels
  • Problem gambling heritability: 40-50% (estimated from MZ-DZ disparity)
  • Overlap in genetics of PG and alcohol dependence: 12-20%
  • Leaves 50-60% responsibility from environment
17
Q

environmental risk factors for gambling

A
  • Exposure to parental gambling in childhood/adolescence
    • Stronger than effects of gambling alone
    • Stronger for paternal gambling
  • Childhood adversity
    • In youth pathological gamblers, 20% reported physical abuse, 18% sexual abuse
    • In adult sample, 61% reported childhood maltreatment
  • Critical role of gene x environment interactions
18
Q

neurocognitive changes

A
  • Problem gamblers were unimpaired on Wisconsin Card Sort task (measure of executive function)
  • However, show deficiencies in things like Iowa gambling task (as previously discussed)
19
Q

fMRI of reward in problem gambling

A
  • Task: picking cards randomly, if you get red you win money, if you get black you lose money
  • Win-related activity in healthy group shows huge brain response; response is significantly weaker in group with gambling problems (use name network, but activation low)
    • This is correlated with how severe their gambling problem was
20
Q

fMRI to natural rewards

A
  • Straight men given cue indicating whether they’re about to get a monetary or erotic reward
    • Study of how quickly they respond to cues -> control group responds similarly to money and erotic rewards; gamblers respond faster to monetary cues (money matters more to them)
    • Activation of ventral striatum only activated for money in problem gamblers; but activated for money and erotic rewards in control
21
Q

Dopamine binding (Volkow)

A

reduced dopamine D2 binding in drug abusers preferring various different substances

22
Q

gambling in parkinson’s disease

A
  • Dopamine agonist meds can trigger excessive gambling
  • Most linked to 2 drugs: pramipexole & ropinirole, that bind to D3 receptors
  • Constellation with other impulse control / reward problems (hypersexuality, shopping)
23
Q

3 main points

A
  • Gambling Disorder has both genetic and environmental risk factors
  • Cognitive and brain imaging data indicate:
    • involvement of vmPFC and ventral striatum
    • similarities with Substance Use Disorders (but also some differences, e.g. drugs can have additional toxic effects)
  • Complex evidence for both reward deficiency and incentive salience as key theories from drug addiction