Paper2: Developmental-Bandura et al Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Describe the aim to Bandura

A
  • Bandura et al’s research set out to understand how aggression is transmitted to a child from models in their environment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did researchers believe before they conducted the study?

A
  • Boys were more aggressive than girls.
  • Seeing aggressive behaviour would result in the child showing aggressive behaviour.
  • Observing a non-aggressive person would reduce the amount of aggression displayed by a child.
  • Children would imitate a same sex model more than an opposite sex model.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where did the study take place?

A
  • Stanford University
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the sample?

A
  • 72 children,
  • aged from 37-69 months
  • with an average of 52 months.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were all the children matched for before the study?

A
  • Children were matched on the basis of their pre-existing aggressivenes
  • rated on a 5-point scale by the experimenter and nursery school teacher prior to the experiment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What design were all three studies?

A
  • matched-pairs design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the independent variable?

A
  • whether the role model was aggressive or non-aggressive,
  • whether the role model was the same sex or opposite sex to the child; there was also
  • a Control condition where the children did not see a role model at all.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the dependent variable?

A
  • recorded the number of verbal, physical, mallet and gun-play aggressive actions the children carried out
  • they also counted the number of acts of non-imitative aggression.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How were the children separated?

A
  • split into 8 experimental groups with 6 children in each and a control group of 24 children
  • Half of the experimental group saw an aggressive role model and half saw a non-aggressive role model.
  • groups split so that half saw a same sex role model and half saw an opposite sex role model.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was stage1?

A

modelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

describe Stage1 of bandura?

A
  1. individually put in toy room for 10mins
  2. 24 children exposed to aggressive - model hit bobo doll
  3. 24 children exposed to non-aggressive
  4. 24 children exposed to no model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was stage2?

A

aggression arousal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe stage2?

A
  1. all children taken individually to separate room
  2. all toys were nice, non-aggressive
  3. child plays with toys
  4. toys are taken away to stimulate aggression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was stage 3?

A

test for delayed imitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe stage3

A
  1. all children put in room with aggressive and non-aggressive toys
  2. all left for 20mins each
  3. observed through 1way mirror
  4. all imitation of model behaviours were recorded in 5secs intervals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the overall results

A

boys did imitate more physical aggression than girls, but not verbal aggression.
seeing aggressive behaviour resulted in the child showing more aggressive behaviour
Aggression was also showed to dampen down when the children saw a non-aggressive model.

17
Q

Describe the gender results

A

Boys were shown to imitate more imitative aggression non-imitative aggression when they observed a male rather than female model.
girls imitated more physical, when they observed a male role model.

18
Q

Describe the conclusions

A

aggression could be influenced by role models and aggressive acts which has been seen would often be imitated.
boys and girls show different patterns of imitation to same versus opposite-sex models.
a non-aggressive model reduced the amount of aggression displayed by both genders.

19
Q

Describe the strengths of the study

A

high ecological validity because of the task of playing with toys which is very realistic.
high replicability to check that the data is reliable.

20
Q

Describe the weaknesses to the study

A

conditions had a very small number of behaviours that were recorded which reduces potential reliability.
long-term consequences have also not been considered
data cannot be generalised to adults

21
Q

Describe the ethics in bandura

A

children may have been under significant distress by watching the adult be aggressive
sample came from a small group from one nursery at a prestigious university,

22
Q

Describe the nature/nurture debate

A

nature - boys were more physically aggressive than girls due to genetics or testosterone
nurture - Observation and imitation of role models led to aggressive behaviour

23
Q

Describe the usefulness debate

A

role models
media
social workers

24
Q

Describe relaibility

A

High inter-rater reliablility
Standardised procedure so it can be replicated

25
Q

Describe ethnocentrism

A

USA has high rates of aggression so they will be more likely to imitate it