Paper2: Cognitive-Loftus and Palmer Flashcards
1
Q
What is memory?
A
ability to store information presented to us and to be able to use that information at some future time to influence our behaviour.
2
Q
Describe the 2 aims to Loftus and Palmer
A
- look at the influence that asking leading questions has on memory
- whether changing words in a question affects a person’s recall immediately or long term
3
Q
What happened in experiment 1?
A
- 7 clips shown of traffic accidents
- fill in questionnaire
‘How fast was the car travelling at when it …?’
contacted, hit, bumped, collided, and smashed
4
Q
What was the IV in Experiment1?
A
- verb in the question chosen
contacted, hit, bumped, collided, and smashed
5
Q
What was the DV in experiment1?
A
- measured the estimated speed the participant gave
6
Q
What happened in Experiment2?
A
- 1clip of car crashes
- 2 questionaires given
- 1 group asked speed when smashed
- 1 group asked speed when hit
- control group not asked about speed
- 1week later asked if ‘there was broken glass’
- no broken glass
7
Q
What were the results in experiment1?
A
- estimated the speed higher when the verb was more aggressive
- smashed = 41mph
- contacted = 32mph
8
Q
What were the results in experiment 2?
A
- 16 ‘smashed’ = yes broken glass
- 7 ‘hit’ = yes broken glass
- 6 control = yes broken glass
- ‘smashed’ had higher speed than ‘hit’
9
Q
Describe the conclusions to Loftus and Palmer?
A
- leading questions had an impact on responses given
- leading questions changed recall
- ‘smashed’ made more difference to memory rather than ‘hit’
10
Q
What were the strengths to Loftus and Palmer?
A
- standardised due to laboratory experiment
- participants were all same age
- realistic to police questioning after an accident
- high reliability
11
Q
What were the weaknesses to Loftus and Palmer?
A
- ecological validity is low, not shown real car crashes
- sample was limited to only students
- not generalisable
- estimations of speed was too variable
12
Q
Describe the ethics of Loftus and Palmer?
A
- triggering to see car crashes
- slightly deceived as they thought they were investigating leading questions
13
Q
How can Loftus and Palmer be considered as useful?
A
- real life implications
- police can use this for interviewing
14
Q
How was loftus deterministic?
A
- eye witness testimony was affected by the leading question
15
Q
How was Loftus situational?
A
- does not measure personality
- verb affected ewt