Paper2: Cognitive-Loftus and Palmer Flashcards

1
Q

What is memory?

A

ability to store information presented to us and to be able to use that information at some future time to influence our behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the 2 aims to Loftus and Palmer

A
  • look at the influence that asking leading questions has on memory
  • whether changing words in a question affects a person’s recall immediately or long term
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happened in experiment 1?

A
  • 7 clips shown of traffic accidents
  • fill in questionnaire
    ‘How fast was the car travelling at when it …?’
    contacted, hit, bumped, collided, and smashed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the IV in Experiment1?

A
  • verb in the question chosen
    contacted, hit, bumped, collided, and smashed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the DV in experiment1?

A
  • measured the estimated speed the participant gave
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened in Experiment2?

A
  • 1clip of car crashes
  • 2 questionaires given
  • 1 group asked speed when smashed
  • 1 group asked speed when hit
  • control group not asked about speed
  • 1week later asked if ‘there was broken glass’
  • no broken glass
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the results in experiment1?

A
  • estimated the speed higher when the verb was more aggressive
  • smashed = 41mph
  • contacted = 32mph
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the results in experiment 2?

A
  • 16 ‘smashed’ = yes broken glass
  • 7 ‘hit’ = yes broken glass
  • 6 control = yes broken glass
  • ‘smashed’ had higher speed than ‘hit’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the conclusions to Loftus and Palmer?

A
  • leading questions had an impact on responses given
  • leading questions changed recall
  • ‘smashed’ made more difference to memory rather than ‘hit’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the strengths to Loftus and Palmer?

A
  • standardised due to laboratory experiment
  • participants were all same age
  • realistic to police questioning after an accident
  • high reliability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the weaknesses to Loftus and Palmer?

A
  • ecological validity is low, not shown real car crashes
  • sample was limited to only students
  • not generalisable
  • estimations of speed was too variable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the ethics of Loftus and Palmer?

A
  • triggering to see car crashes
  • slightly deceived as they thought they were investigating leading questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can Loftus and Palmer be considered as useful?

A
  • real life implications
  • police can use this for interviewing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How was loftus deterministic?

A
  • eye witness testimony was affected by the leading question
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How was Loftus situational?

A
  • does not measure personality
  • verb affected ewt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly