paper 1-memory

Question 1

what 3 things differ in both LTM and STM

Answer 1

duration(how long info can be held for)
capacity(how much info can be held)
encoding(form of which info is held)

Question 2

what was the study into the duration of STM

Answer 2

Peterson and Peterson
-recruited 24 uni students to conduct research on
-presented particpants with nonsense triagram and 3 digit number
-nonsense triagram was nonsense so had no meaning to ps
–after ps had to count backwards in 3s from number they were given until told to stop
-done to prevent rehersal-stop them repeating triagram
-after intervals of 3, 6, 9 ,12 seconds aked to recall triagram
-repeated over 8 trials with differnt nonse triagram each time
-results showed when there was only a 3 seodn interval, nearly 90% of traigrams remebered
-when 18% ps only remebred 2%
-conclusion was that STm disappears very quickly when rehersal is prevented

Question 3

A03 for duration of STM

Answer 3

strength-replicable
uses highly standardised procedur
high contol over variable
e.g traigrm as nonsense
and all particpants haveing to count back in 3
makes it easy for procedure to be repeated
weakness-lack of ecological validity
due to it being a lab experiment
has highly contolled artifical setting

wekaness-lacks mudane realism
recalling traigrmas is not how stm is worked on a day to day
meaning not generaliable outside the study
lack of poulation validity-
used 24 uni students which would nto be representative of wider popualtion
sample size is small
STm duration msy be better as have to utlise memory more often for exams etc

Question 4

study of duration in LTM

Answer 4

Bahrick et al
asked 392 graduates from american high school
experiment on memory of their former class mates
used various memory tests e.g recalling people with pictures, matching names to pictures etc
ps performed well up to 34 years
recongion tasks were better then recall tasks
dip in pefomance for all types of memery tasks past 47 years
hard to tell if from ageing factors or increase in duration
shows LTM has a duration of up to several years

Question 5

a03 for duration of LTM

Answer 5

high ecological validity-recalling faces are way in which we use our LTM in everyday life
has mudane realism and can be gernalised outside of study
extraneous variables-dont know how colse people were to eachother in school
some may have been in touch with pps after school ‘
means duration being tested is not accurate

Question 6

study of capacity of STM

Answer 6

Jacobs
conducted in lab
presnts ps with random sequences of digits or letters
then asked them to repeat them back in same order presented in
started with 3 digit numbers and increased until pps failed to reproduce sequence succesfully
found that 5-9 items was the average STM span
digits were recalledd better then letters
STM has limited capaciy storage (5-9 items)

Question 7

study of capacity of LTM

Answer 7

luria reported case on soloman shrevesky memory so pefect could remeber virtually every detail of his life
studied him for 30 years
gave him long lists of words, numbers
all were recalled perfectl\y
found no limit of capacity in solomans memory

Question 8

weakness of capacity of LTM study

Answer 8

extraneous variables-do not know how long he took memorising it in free time
lacks population validity-onlybased on case study
not replicable as only focused on 1 person

Question 9

strength of capacity of LTM study

Answer 9

high ecological validy as real life scenario

Question 10

study of acoustic and semantic encoding

Answer 10

Baddeley
aim-to compare encoding in STM and LTM
labatory study
pps presnted with short list of words to remember
words were either smantically similair e.g neat, tidy
or acoustically similar e.g neat. sweet
recall tested both immidentialy and then again after delay
when testing immediate recall (STM) pps recalled fewer words when they were acoustically smilair
when testing recall after delay(LTM) pps recored fewer semantically similar words
Results show LTM usually uses semantic words

Question 11

multi store memory model

Answer 11

explantion of how memory processes work
model is by Atkinson and shriffin attempts to explain why some things are remembered, some not
suggests human memory consists of separate stores

Question 12

REMINDER:need to know how to draw the multi store model

Question 13

what are the three types of LTM

Answer 13

Procedural
Semantic
Episodic

Question 14

procedual LTM description

Answer 14

our knowldge of skills or simply how to do things e.g riding a bike
can recall memory without concious effect
e.g changing gear in car, do it automatically without thinking
not declarative
utilises the motor cortx and cerebrullum

Question 15

semantic LTM description

Answer 15

knowledge of the world
tehy are facts
require concious effect to recall
e.g the queen, taste of an orange
declarative and located in left prefrontal cortex

Question 16

episodic

Answer 16

regards our ability to recall particular events(epsiodes)
require concious effect to recall
e.g festival you went too
1. you have to remember when it happened
2.who you went with
have to make a concious efefct to rememebr even if its fast you still have to think back to what happened to recall it

Question 17

working memory model

Answer 17

proposed by Baddley and Hitch in repsonse to what they belive is major problems with atkinson and shriffin model (multi store model)

Question 18

what does the working memory model contain

Answer 18

central executive(inner brain)
phonological loop
episodic buffer
visio-spatial sketchpad

Question 19

central executive-inner brain

Answer 19

free component
has limited capacity
allocates jobs to 2 other components

Question 20

phonolgical loop-inner voice
holds speech based info

Answer 20

subdivided into 2 components
phonological store-concerned with speech perception (hearing)
articulatory process-concerned with speech production (saying)

Question 21

visual spatial sketchpad-inner eye
holds picture based info

Answer 21

subdivided into 2 components
visucal cache-hols info about form and colour
inner scribe-deals with spatial and movement info and transfers info to central executive

Question 22

episodic buffer-holds and integrates divers info

Answer 22

has limited capacity-about 4 chunks
temporary store of into integrating the bisual, spatial and verbal unfo from other stores

Question 23

interference theory

Answer 23

belive forgetting is caused by tqo memories competing
memory can be disrupted by either previous learning or future learning
degree of forgetting is greater if memories are similar

Question 24

retroactive interference
RIP

Answer 24

when a new memory interferes with a old one
e.g forget your classmates names fro last year as have new ones for this year

Question 25

proactive interference

Answer 25

when an old memory interferes with a new one e.g when you remember your old phone number rather then your new phone number

Question 26

retrieval failure

Answer 26

info is stores in LTM but can not be assessed forgettign due to this theory is a lack of cues external enviorment was different at recall from how it was at coding

Question 27

context dependent forgetting (external cues-factors of the environment)

Answer 27

can occur if enviorent is different in recall then when it was being learnt godden and Baddley

Question 28

Godden and Baddeley

Answer 28

carried out study on deep sea divers working underwater divers given list of words to learn either underwater or on land they then had to recall the words either underwater or on land created 4 conditions on land-on land underwater-underwater underwater-on land on land-underwater

Question 29

state dependent forgetting

Answer 29

this is where the mood/psychological state you were in is different to mood you were in when you were learning carter and cassaday created 4 conditons

Question 30

affecting accuracy of eyewitness testimony-misleading information

Answer 30

loftus and palmer wanted to see affect of leading questions on eyewitness testimony 45 students watched film clip of car accident and gave them questions about the accident critcal question (leading question)was about speed about how fast were the cars travelling when they hit one another there were 5 groups each had different verb from hit e.g smashed mean estimated speed was calcualted for each group contacted=31.8mph smashed=40.5mph conclusion=leading questions bias EWT of an event

Question 31

what did Bartley believe

Answer 31

memory is not like a camera and is vulnerable to inaccuracies due to previous experiences

Question 32

what was loftus and almers second experiment

Answer 32

aim-support explanation showed prticpants video of car accident ad changed verb yet again however, also asked them if they recalled seeing broken glass or not those who heard hit were less likley to report seeing broken glasss those who heard smash were more liekly to report seeing broken glass conclusion-leading question actually altered their memory of event

Question 33

what is a standard interview

Answer 33

used in past by pilice for EWT involves questions hich are breif, closed and direct questions were not in chronological order police would often interrupt witness and not let them expand questions any further

Question 34

cogntive interview

Answer 34

method of interviewing to help them retreive more memories there are 4 techniques

Question 35

what are the 4 techniqes of cognitive interview LION RRRR

Answer 35

Recretae context of orginal incident Report every detail Recall the event in different orders Recall event from chnaged/different perspective

Question 36

recreate context of orignal incident

Answer 36

witness should return to crime scene in mind e.g what they culd aee and emotions they were feelign

Question 37

report every detail

Answer 37

what may seem as irrelevent, may act as trigger for important info

Question 38

recall the event in different orders

Answer 38

pevent dishonesty

Question 39

recall the event from a different perpective

Answer 39

may provide differrent retieval cues

Question 40

retrieval failure

Answer 40

forgetting in LTM-retrieval failure information stored in LTM but cannot be assessed -forgetting is due to a lack in cues -occurs when enviroment different at recall from how it was at coding -e.g getting fewer marks in test when sat at shcool rather then home due to comfort of own home

Question 41

retrieval failure

Answer 41

Context dependent forgetting-external cues(from environment) State dependent forgetting-internal cues

Question 42

context dependent forgetting

Answer 42

occurs when environment is different during recall then when it was when being learnt to recall Godden and Baddeley carried out study in deep sea divers

Question 43

what was the procedure of godden and baddley study

Answer 43

divers learnt a list of words either underwater or on land asked to recall either underwater or on land study had 4 conditions learn on land-recall on land learn underwater-recall underwater learn on land-recall underwater learn underwater-recall on land

Question 44

weaknesses of Godden and Baddeley study

Answer 44

artificial-in real life situations, dont remember list of words memory used to remember more complex information can be criticised as not reflective of real life memory findings have low ecological validity

Question 45

strength of Godden and Baddeley study

Answer 45

abernathy found students performed better in tests if tests took place in same room and if administrated by same instructor who had taught the information supports theory of context dependent forgetting as shows recall worse when coding and recall environment are different

Question 46

state dependent forgetting (internal cues)

Answer 46

occurs when mood or psychological state during recall is different from mood when learning -carter and cassaday -gave anti-histamine drugs for treating hay fever had mild effect making participants feel drowsy -creates different psychological state to normal state of being alert and awake again 4 conditions learn on drug-recall on it learn on it-recall when not on it learn not on drug-recall when on it learn not on it-recall when not on it

Question 47

godden and baddleys study

Answer 47

carried out study on deep sea divers divers learnt a list of words either underwater or on rand recall them either underwater or unland 4 conditons learn underwater-recall underwater learn on land-recall on land learn underwater-recall on land learn on land-recall underwater

Question 48

carter and cassaday

Answer 48

gave anti histermine drugs for treating hayfewer they had mild effect of making particpants drowsy creates inter-psychological state different from normal state of being awake and alert participants had to learn list of words 4 condtions learn on drug-recall on drug learn not on it-recall not on it learn not on it-recall on it learn on it-recall not on it found wwhen cues are absent, there is more forgetting

Question 49

accuracy of EWT:loftus and palmer

Answer 49

misleading questions used 45 students all had to watch a video clip of a car accident asked quesitons also asked them critical quesion(leading question) how fast were the cars travelling when they hit eachother there were 5 different groups and each group had a diffreent word to hit e.g smashed, contacted mean estimated speed was calculated contacted=31.8mph smashed=40.5 leading questions bias EWT of an event

Question 50

secnd study of loftus and palmer

Answer 50

support the substiitution explantion did the same rocess of changing the verb in the critical quesion also asked them do you recall seeing glass or not the gorup with the word hit were less liekly to report broken glass then the gorup with the verb smashed showed leading quesion is critical altered peoples whole memory of event

Question 51

what are the two types of interviews

Answer 51

cognitive standard

Question 52

standard interview

Answer 52

in past, police used standard interview of ewt involved questions that were brief closed and direct wasnt in chroniolical order they would interuprt witnesses and not allow them to expand answers

Question 53

cognitive interview

Answer 53

method of intervwieing eyewitnees to help them retirve more accrate memories