non-experimental - types of observations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

controlled observation

A
  • conditions are manipulated by the researcher
  • may be in lab/artificial environment CONTEXT
  • e.g. Ainsworth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

controlled observation strength

A
  • high reliability
  • controlled environment
  • standardised procedure CONTEXT
  • easily repeated in same conditions to check for consistent results
  • gains more respect from other professionals and members of public
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

controlled observation limitation

A
  1. low eco val
    - controlled environment
    - difficult to generalise beyond setting
    - lowers external validity
  2. demand characteristics
    ONLY IF PPTS UNDER 10 YRS
    - change natural behaviour
    - to help/hinder researcher
    - due to clues given off
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

naturalistic observation

A
  • watching natural behaviour
  • in natural environment
  • target population would usually occur
  • no manipulation of variables CONTEXT
  • e.g. aggression in playground
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

naturalistic observation strengths

A
  1. high eco val
    - real life setting CONTEXT
    - easily generalised beyond setting to other settings CONTEXT - FINDINGS?
    - high external validity
  2. less prone to demand characteristics
    ONLY USE IF PPTS OVER 10 YRS
    - less likely to know they are being watched
    - natural setting CONTEXT
    - target behaviour would occur CONTEXT
    - less likely to change natural behaviour
    - to help/hinder
    - increases internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

naturalistic observation limitations

A
  1. low reliability
    - real life setting CONTEXT
    - difficult to replicate
    - cannot be repeated in same conditions to check for consistent results
  2. lack of informed consent
    - ppts do not know they are being watched
    - natural setting CONTEXT
    - no consent
    - if they become aware may withdraw data from study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

overt observations

A
  • ppts aware their behaviour (CONTEXT) is being observed
  • so aware of aims of research CONTEXT
  • observer visible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

overt observation strengths

A
  • more ethical
  • ppts aware they are being watched CONTEXT - HOW?
  • consent given
  • right to withdraw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

overt observation limitation

A
  • more prone demand characteristics
    ONLY IF PPTS OVER 10
  • know they are being watched - CONTEXT - HOW?
  • change natural behaviour
  • to help/hinder researcher
  • based of clues given
  • lowers internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

covert observation

A
  • ppts unaware they are being observed
  • researcher hidden/cameras/two-way mirror
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

covert observation strength

A
  • less prone to demand characteristics
  • ppts unaware they are being watched CONTEXT - HOW?
  • less likely to change natural behaviour
  • to help/hinder researcher
  • increases internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

covert observation limitation

A
  • lack of informed consent
  • ppts unaware they are being watched CONTEXT - HOW?
  • did not consent
  • invasion of privacy
  • may withdraw data if they become aware
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

participant observation

A
  • researcher involved with group CONTEXT
  • data collected whilst being part of group CONTEXT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

participant observation strength

A
  • observer can gain in-depth understanding
  • part of group CONTEXT - HOW?
  • will not miss important aspects e.g. feelings/motivation CONTEXT
  • increases internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

participant observation limitation

A
  • researcher bias
  • ppt part of group CONTEXT - HOW?
  • decreases objectivity
  • researchers own thoughts/behaviours may impact
  • lowers internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

non-participant observation

A
  • researcher not part of group CONTEXT
  • data collected from distance e.g. camera
17
Q

non-participant observation strength

A
  • reduced chance of researcher bias
  • researcher not part of group CONTEXT - HOW?
  • behaviours/feelings/thoughts will not impact observation
  • increases objectivity
  • increases internal validity
18
Q

on-participant observation limitation

A
  • less likely to gain in-depth understanding
  • not part of group CONTEXT - HOW?
  • may miss important aspects e.g. feelings/motivations CONTEXT
  • lowers internal validity