Necesity Defences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

In what statute is self defence confirmed in ?

A

s76 of the criminal justice and immigration act 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

To use the self defence, defence what questions must be asked ?

A

Was it necessary to use this degree of force ?

was the degree of force used proportional or reasonable ?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can D pre-empt and attack and strike out in self defence ?

A

Yes as per R V Bird (1986)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What would happen if D was the initial aggressor ?

A

D would still be able to argue for self defence, unless they remained the aggressor throughout ?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the rule on proportionate force ?

A

In all situations, (except as a householder) force that is disproportionate will be considered unreasonable therefore not legal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the house holder case ?

A

Force must be used by D while in or partly in a building that was in dwelling

D must not be a trespasser

D must believe V is a trespasser

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened in R V Ray (2017) ?

A

D and V’s ex partner were together in the former shared home, V arrived in an angry mood and fought with D, D feared V would fatally stab him so D stabbed V first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what 3 instances can reasonable force be used in ?

A

D defending themselves from a criminal attack

D preventing an attack on another person

D defending their property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is duress not a complete defence for ?

A

murder & attempted murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the test for duress, set out out in r v Hasan (2005) ?

A

There must be :
Threat to cause death or serious injury

directed at D, their family or someone close to them

Whether D acted reasonably or not will be judged objectively

Threats relate directly to the crime committed by D

no evasive action D could have taken

D cannot use the defence if they have voluntarily laid themselves open to the threats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In the event that D raises this defence, who must prove beyond all reasonable doubt, that D was not under duress ?

A

The prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened in R v Willer (1986) ?

A

D, was driving down a narrow road, but felt as though he had to drive on the pavementin order to escape, & reported the incident to the police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly