Motivations and Emotions Flashcards
definition of motivation
driving force for intaition, perssistance and goal-directed behaviour
the need/desire to do something
levels of motivation
- immediate need
- long term need (goals, careers)
- physiological
- pscyhological
what is a drive
simplification of stimulu-response relationship whereby a behaviour is innitiated
(6) theories of emotion?
- Instinct Theory
- Pyschodynamic Theory
- Incentive Theory
- Drive-Reduction Theory
- Arousal Theory
- Humanistic Theory
example of stimulus-response
stimulus= indepdnent; water deprivation
response= dependent= drinking water
the motivation= thirst for drinking
what theories are internal predictors of behaviour
drive reduction theory
arousal theory
what theories are external predictors of behaviour
incentive theory
which theories are both internal and external predictors of behaviour
huanistic theories such as Maslows
Instinct Theory
1980 William James:
all behaviour can be explained by innate instincts
evolutionary perspective; complex unlearned behaviours with fixe patterns in species
Pyschodynamic theory
1920 Freud: motivation is the battle between pleasure and death that drives behaviour
why is instinct theory not useful today
- doesnt explain external motiators or influences on behaviour such as culture or sociality
Incentive Theory:
behaviours are reinforced by previous experiences of rewards and punishments
proposed by: Skinner 1940
Drive-Reduction Theory
behavioural drives are a state of tension caused by internal imbalances aiming to achieving equillibgirum
homeostatic/hydraulic model
by Hull 1943
Arousal Theory
behavioural drives result from arousal levels being above/below optimum hence we either are exicted/calm to achieve neutrality
by Hebb and Thompson 1954
what does arousal theory explain
why we might seek ‘senstation’ seeking activities (like sky diving)
Humanisitc Theory
we week to maximised satifaction and personal pleasure in a hierarchial structure of needs/stages; focuses on positive motives as opposed to defects
proposed by Maslow in the 1960s
example of how drive-reduction theory works
homeostatically;
having a ‘set point’ and ‘error dectection’ margins that issue autonomic responses to regulate body processes such as temperature, energy levels, hormones, etc.
homestostatis
processes that maintain an internal equillibrium
what key brain area plays a role in drive eduction theory
The hypothalmus–> it maintains homestostatis (body temp control, hormones, etc )
evidence for drive reduction theory
- Glucostatic Theory and Experiments
- biologitical and intutive
- adult body weight remains relatively constant
evidence against drive reduction theory (6)
- binge eating (like at christmas; uncontrollable eating regardles of hunger)
- eating disorders
- consuming high E foods (red bull) before eating doesnt reduce eating
- obesity epidemic
- patient RH= a man who forgot to eat
- doesnt address taste, learnign, visual cues/social norms (external factors) influencing hunger/eating
what influences what we eat
- decreased nutritive density of a diet (calories per unit)
- sensory specific satiety (taste)
- social infleunces (i.e. eating with others)
- serving size (misleading visual cues)
- (sometimes) major energy deficits; but not a factor in captilistic/food filled societies
Warsink 2005 Study
soup eating:
- normal bowls
- self-refilling bowls
people with self-refilling bowls eat 73% more than people with normal bowls= implies serving size is a avisual cue for satiety
Minnesotta Starvation Experiment 1944
young men starve by experiments to figure out how to treat famine victims of war:
results:
- Food became an obsession (reading cook books, planning)
- sexual drives dminished, weak bones, anxious and depression
- feeling sof guilt/binge eating food (eating disorders)
UCSD University Study 2015
people with anexorisa= feel less ‘reward’ when given food= hence HUNGER is not an incentive to eat
what can homeo-static theories not account for
hunger and other motiations caused by extenral cues;
other motivation such as sex, love, money making and approval have no clear ‘set-point’
Glucostatic Theory of Hunger
by Mayer in 2005: experiments on lab animals whereby reducing the blood sugar in lab animals (rats) through insulin injrectsiont hen increases the animals eating
this is because the hypothalmsus acts on the glucoreceptors or thermoreceptors (blood sugar reculators) to incentivize hunger/eating
why is hunger used as an example for drive reduction theory
as hunger= is a consequenc eof energy deficit due to low gluclose levels and need to stabailize body fat levels which the hypothalamus regulates
what does the incentive theory account for
non physiologial motivations and rewards for behaviour
olds and milner 1954 experiment
they identified the brains reward center accidnetally, after trying to identify how to make rats emotionally uncomfortable:
- -> placed electrodes in rats brain and stimulated areas
- -> the rat learned to return over and over again to a lever in a cage [positive reinforecement]
when rats given opportunity to ‘self adminisniter’ stimulations= they pressed the lever over 700 times in an hour preferring the lever over food, water and exhaustion
where is the reward center of the brain
nucleus accumbens (stratium in basal anglia); activity increases here with rewards
when does activity in the reward center increase (examples
- drug addicts when they see pictures of drugs (paraphernalia)
- when smokers get nicotine
- when mothers see pics of babies (swain 2008)
- when participants anticipate monetary rewards (knutson 2001)
Schaelpfer 2008 study
stimulated the nucleus accumbens in depressed humans and found an increase in the ANTICIPATION of positive events
demonstrates increase of WANTING a positive outcome; but not neccesarily feeling pleasure
wanting
motivational incentive value of the same reward (not a sensory experience)
liking
hedonic impact of receiving the award (brains reaction to sensory pleasure)
hunger incentive theory
humans and animals eat due to the anticipated pleasure of eating (positive reward perspective)
so EATING is a reward
milkner kesen 1952 study
rats learn to navigate a maze with milk reward incentive:
found that rats prefer to DRINK the milk as opposed to just having it pumped in stomacth
so anticipatory eating is a classically condionted response
how do the reward center and the hypothalmus work
–> hypothalamus (containing glucoreceptors) is found here in the septal region which is responsible for dopamine release that affects the nucleus accumbens activity
how might the hunger incentive theory be evolutionary explained
we have evolved to crave food in order to take advantage of when there AE fatty calories present
wanting vs liking
they go together but have different neural mechanisms
- liking= hedonic impact (brain reaction to sensory pleasure by reward) - wanting= incentive salience (motivational incentive value of the same reward= NOT A SENSORY pleasure)
Maslos Hierarchial Theory: 3 main points
- humans have a wide range of needs
- needs vary over time
- needs are hierarhcial
Maslows Hierarhcy of Needs (the levels)
- Physyioloical (breathing, food, water, sleep, sex, homeostatis, excretion)
- Safety (health, moratliy, family, shelter, friends)
- Love/Belonging (family, freindship, sexual intimacy)
- Esteem (confidnece, rsepectve)
- Self-Actualization (creativity, morality, etc)
Defiency vs Growth Needs
Deficency needs= need to be fullfilled first as signs of deprivation (levels 1-3; from physiological to esteem)
Growth Needs= no fear of deprivation allows for individuals to fullfipple personal positive potentiatl (self actualization)
what does subjetive wellbeing correlate to
subjective wellbeing
limitations of maslows hierarhy of needs
- not strictly hierarchial
- bias towards western individualisitc ideas of personal growth; doesnt engage with reladeness/collective identity in self-actualization
Tay and Diener 2011
conducted a cross cultural study
found that self satisfcaition correlates with subjective wellbeing in hierarhcial needs-based societies
but little evdience for a direct rigid structure of needs (some needs are more important that others)
what is an incentive
a positive/negative stimuli that arouses us
optimal arousal
rather than reducing/meeting tensions or drives we are motivated to maintain a balance between stimulation and relaxation
what is affect
subjective and conscious sensation and feeling measured by PANAS questionate (affect distinguishes from emotion as its a conscious measurable feeling)
what is a physiological state
arousal (hear trate, pupils, hormones) that is determined by sympathethic nervous system
examples of emotional expressions
vocalizations, facial expressions, body expressions
what is a drive
motivations of behaviour (response/reaction)
what is a thought
a style of thinking (cognition; thinking)
pyschological definition of an emotion
a constellation of multiple factors such as affect, physiological elements, emotional expressions, drives and thoughts that can be felt by the whole body
a ‘mind-body’ response to a stimulus of some kind resultin in physiological arousal, expressive behaviour and concious experience
how can emotional expressions be measured
EMG (electromyography) electrodes measuring facial changes or frame/by/frame analysis of video recordings
Numenmag 2014 Study
asked participants to say when they felt an emotion in the body using a MAP OF THE BODY to localize emotions where people experience physiological responses
Ekmann + Friesen 1971 Study
studied facial expressions to see if there are ‘universal/basic emotions’
Method:
1. took exagerrated photos of faces and showed them to isolated new guinea tribe and a group of american researchres
- asked each group to correlate faces to a story
Results:
- despite cultural differences; emotional expression not arbitrarty
- both groups had similar conclusiosn and aggreed upon expressions
- 6 primary emotions were identified
6 primary emotions
anger fear disgust surprise happines sadness
Secondary Emotions
combinations of the primary:
i.e.
anger + fear–> jealousy
fear + disgust—> shame
surprise + happiness—> delight
Limitations of Ekman and Freisen 1971 Study
- primary facial expressions rarely occur in pure form
- other primary emotions exist (trust, curiousity)
- body cues are also important expressions
- photos were exagerated
- recognition and expression of emotions is not as universal as variations exist (in west vs east asia; nodding heads as different meanings)