Memory Flashcards
What 3 ways are long term and short term memory different
1) duration
2) capacity
3) coding
What is the short term memory duration
18-30 seconds without rehearsal
Experiment for short term memory duration
Conducted by Peterson and Peterson (1959)
1) 24 undergraduate students were presented with a consonant trigram
2) they were then asked to count backwards in threes to stop them from rehearsing the trigram
3) After intervals of 3 -18 seconds, participants had to stop counting and repeat the trigram
4) this was repeated using different trigrams.
Results of Peterson and Peterson (1959) STM duration experiment
1) participants could remember 90% of trigrams after 3 seconds
2) 20% after 9 seconds
3) less than 10% after 18 seconds
Strengths of Peterson and Peterson experiment
1) a strength of this study is that it is a lab experiment where variables are tightly controlled for example, how long the trigrams are presented for.
2) The procedure can also be replicated to test if results are reliable. For example, nonsense trigrams can be given to participants today to see if the duration of short term memory has gotten better or worse
Weaknesses of the Peterson and Peterson experiment
1) Trigrams are an unrealistic thing to remember as we do not remember meaningless trigrams in regular day to day life. Therefore it can be said that the experiment has low ecological validity.
2) the trigrams presented in earlier trials may have interfered with when partcipants came to remember trigrams in later trials so we do not know if results gained from participants were due to forgetting the trigrams or being confused due to interference.
Experiment for long term memory - duration
It was conducted by Bahrick et al (1975)
They tested how well 400 American participants (17-74 years old) could remember their former classmates by asking them to identify pictures, matching names to pictures and recalling names with no picture cue.
Results of Bahrick et al study
1) even after 48 years, when asked to link names and faces, accuracy was around 70%.
2) however when asked to free recall the names of the classmates, accuracy dropped to 30%
3) recall is much higher with cues suggesting that cues are often needed to help retrieval
Duration of long term memory
Lifetime
Strengths of Bahrick et al experiment
1) Bahrick’s experiment has high external validity because the researchers investigated meaningful material therefore this study has higher ecological validity than Peterson’s study which uses nonsense trigrams, whereas remembering names is a day to day task.
Weaknesses of Bahrick et al’s experiment
1) as Bahrick’s study is a natural experiment, the experimenter had less control of the independent variable thus it is likely that some of the names were rehearsed eg, if classmates had still been in touch. This would be a confounding variable making results potentially invalid
2) it looked at a very specific type of information, names of classmates. This type of information is meaningful and therefore not all LTMs remain there for a lifetime.
What is the capacity of the short term memory
Miller (1956) concluded it was 5-9 items
Cowan (2001) concluded capacity was about 4 items
Experiment for capacity of short term memory
It was conducted by Jacobs (1887)
He developed the serial digit span technique. The researcher read out 4 digits ans the participant was asked to repeat it back immediately. More digits were added until the partcipants could no longer accurately repeat the digits back.
Results of Jacob’s study
On average about 9 digits and 7 letters were correctly recalled. This capacity increased with age during childhood.
Evaluation of Jacob’s study
1) one problem with jacob’s research is that it lacks ecological validity- learning random lists of numbers and repeating them back is not a realistic method to test the capacity of STM . More meaningful information may be recalled better.
2) another problem with Jacob’s study is that previous sequences may have confused participants in later trials so we do not know if that factor becomes a confounding variable.
3) as Jacob’s study was conducted so long ago, we cannot be sure extraneous variables were controlled . However the experiment has been repeated and the study does have validity.
The 3 possible ways information can be coded
1) Acoustic coding: storing information in terms of the way it sounds
2) semantic coding: coding information in terms of its meaning
3) visual coding: storing information in terms of how it looks
Experiment for coding of memory
It was conducted by Baddeley (1966)
Partcipants were shown a sequence of 5 words under one of four conditions ans then immediately had to write them down in order:
1) acoustically similar words
2) acoustically dissimilar words
3) semantically similar words
4) semantically dissimilar words
Results of Baddeley’s experiment
1) when tested immediately (STM) participants were least accurate with the acoustically similar words
2) when tested 20 minutes later (LTM) participants were least accurate with semantically similar words.
Evaluation of Baddeley’s experiment
1) Baddeley’s experiment has low ecological validity. This means findings cannot be applied to real life as the words given were a meaningless list. As a consequence this does not tell us much about coding memories in everyday life.
2) Baddeley’s experiement does identify a clear difference in the coding of the two memory stores making his experiment more accurate.
Who developed the multi store model
Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin (1968)
How is information processed through the multi store model
1) first information is detected from the environment by the sense organs and enters the sensory register
2) if attention is payed to this information in this SR then it enters the short term memory
3) if the information in the STM is rehearsed it enters the long term memory.
4) to transfer information from LTM to STM, the information has to be retrieved.
Sensory register - duration , capacity , coding
Duration - very brief (250 Milliseconds)
Capacity - unlimited
Coding - depends on the sense (visual auditory taste smell touch)
Sensory register stores
Iconic store - visual images
Echoic store - auditory sense
Haptic store -physical senses of touch
Gustatory store -taste information
Olfactory store - smell
Evidence for the sensory register
1) Sperling (1960) carried out a lab experiment, where participants were shown a grid with three rows of four letters for 50 milliseconds.
2) They then had to immediately recall either the whole grid or a random row indicated by a tone.