Loftus and Palmer (1974) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

reconstructive memory definition

A

the way in which our biases and prejudices can unconsciously lead us to have memories of events that are distortions of what actually happened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

leading questions definition

A

a question that by its form or content suggests to the witness what answer is desired or leads them to the desired answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

aim of loftus and palmer experiment

A

to investigate the effects of language on memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what research method used in the experiment and how do we know

A

laboratory experiment, the IV (critical question) was manipulated by the experimenter, and the study took place in a controlled environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in what way was the data collected

A

through a questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe the sample in experiment one

A

45 student participants split into 5 groups of 9 from Washington USA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

name the 5 verbs used in the different conditions of experiment 1 (IV)

A

contacted, hit, bumped, collided, smashed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the dependent variable of experiment one

A

the mean speed estimate (in miles per hour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the procedure of experiment one

A
  • participants shown SEVEN film clips, given a questionnaire to complete after each clip
  • two parts of the questionnaire: give an account of the accident just seen, answer a set of questions related to the accident
    (researchers interested in critical question about the speed of the vehicle)
  • groups presented with a different order of films to prevent order effects ( exp lasted around 1 hour 30 min)
  • IV manipulated by changing the wording of the critical question with different verbs
    (critical question dependent variable, hidden by distracter questions)
  • question format ‘about how fast were the cars going when they —– each other?’
  • each subject received one of 5 questions in their questionnaire, theorised stronger verb equals higher speed estimate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb smashed

A

40.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb collided

A

39.3mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb bumped

A

38.1mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb hit

A

34.0mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the mean speed estimate for the verb contacted

A

31.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

conclusions from experiment one

A

the form of the question affected the witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe interpretation 1 of experiment 1 explanation of results

A

(Response bias)
- the word in the critical question biases participants to give a different speed estimate

17
Q

Describe interpretation 2 of experiment 1 explanation of results

A

(Memory change)
The language used causes a change in the participants memory representation of events (the verb ‘smashed’ could mean the participants ‘see’ a more severe accident when trying to remember it)

18
Q

What experimental design was used in experiment 2 and why

A

Laboratory experiment, DV and IV controlled in a controlled environment

19
Q

Describe the sample in experiment 2

A
  • 150 student participants (divided into 3 groups of 50)
  • Washington USA
20
Q

Describe stage 1 of experiment 2

A
  • participants watch a less than a minute film showing a multiple car crash
  • asked to fill out 1/3 versions of a questionnaire (depending on the group)
21
Q

Describe stage 2 of experiment 2

A
  • participants asked 10 questions
  • contains critical question ‘did you see any broken glass?’
22
Q

What were the 3 conditions of the independent variable in experiment 2

A

50 participants asked
- ‘about how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?’
Or
- ‘about how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’
Or
- not asked about speed of vehicles, control group

23
Q

What was the dependent variable of experiment 2

A

The number of participants from each condition of the experiment who said they remembered having seen broken glass in the video

24
Q

How many participants in the ‘smashed’ verb condition remembered seeing broken glass

A

16/50

25
Q

How many participants in the ‘hit’ verb condition remembered seeing broken glass

A

7/50

26
Q

How many participants in the control group remembered seeing broken glass

A

6/50

27
Q

What were the conclusions of experiment 2

A

The verb used in a question can affect the speed a witness estimates at and whether they recall having seeing broken glass
- the form of a question does affect a witnesses’ memory)

28
Q

What two things make up our memory of a complex event

A

Our own perception- the event is what you think happened, based off your own memory
External information- content given after the event (can be through police questions, media coverage etc.)
-> hard to distinguish between the two when recalling a memory

29
Q

In what ways is this study ethnocentric

A

Only students from America (upper middle class) were studied
- could only reflect how university educated peoples cognitive processes work

30
Q

In what ways is this study not ethnocentric

A

Reconstructive memory depends on the physiognomy of our brain, so it’s investigating species-species behaviour (cognitive processes are universal)