LO 2.1.1: Predict how psychology in terms of cognitive errors will affect a client’s goals, perspective, understanding, decision making process and actions. Flashcards
Cognitive errors
Cognitive errors are decision-making based on well-known concepts that may or may not be correct.
* based on lack of understanding or faulty reasoning
Cognitive errors can be mitigated by
better coaching or information.
Illusion of control bias
Believe you can control outcome of an event when you cannot.
- related to overconfidence bias
- e.g. trading more bc can control outcome or are overconfident in analysis
Money illusion
Tendency to think one dollar has the same value today, tomorrow, and into the future, without considering inflation.
* e.g. 7% return in 8% inflation vs. 4% return in 2% inflation, money illusion is choosing 7% return / getting more excited about higher returns than lower interest rates.
Conservatism bias
Initially form a rational view but fail to change that view as new information becomes available.
- Example on p. 55:
- A client’s stock is a pharmaceutical company switches from five-day to overnight shipping. The stock rose. Later, the same company violated laboratory practices and was fined, which will likely cause the stock to fall. But the client still subconsciously weighed the shipping info as more important, so the client did not sell the stock.
Hindsight bias
Selective memory of the past and have a tendency to remember your correct views and forget your errors.
* They also overestimate what could have been known.
Confirmation bias
look for ways to justify your current beliefs.
- Example on p. 57:
- Client has been employed at a co. for 25 years, feels he has more info as an employee of co. than those not employed (this is not the case). Client invests more into his employer’s stock—leads to underdiversification and increase of risk of loss that could have been mitigated with diversification.
Representativeness
When considering choices in a decision, you tend to recall a past experience similar to the present decision-making situation, and assume this one is like the other.
- Example on p. 57-58:
- A stock could be classified as a value stock, and so new information is analyzed based on that classification even if the stock is not really a value stock.
Sample size neglect
Related to representativeness, initial classification based on overly small and potentially unrealistic sample of data.
- Example on p. 58:
- Initial classification of a stock based on dividend yield, without considering any of the other typical characteristics of a value stock
Mental Accounting
Mental accounting (AKA money jar mentality) involves the tendency of individuals to mentally put their money into separate accounts (or money jars) based on the purpose of these accounts.
- Example on p. 59:
- Client saved for $15K a Mediterranean cruise in 6 months, but roof began leaking, repairs cost $10K. Client decides to withdrawal from IRA to pay income tax plus 10% penalty instead of spending the money saved for his vacation. Irrational financial decision resulted by mentally putting money into separate accounts based on the function of these accounts.
Cognitive Dissonance
Conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors that cause a feeling of mental discomfort. This leads to changing some of attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to reduce discomfort and feel more balanced.
Selective perception
Related to cognitive dissonance,
- Only register info that appears to affirm with an already chosen decision.
- This ties to rationalization or confirmation bias (p. 57).
Selective decision-making
Related to cognitive dissonance, * This occurs when commitment to an original decision course is high.
* Rationalizes actions that enable a person to adhere to the original course.
Self-Attribution bias
Ego defense mechanism.
* Individuals take credit for success, and blame others or external factors for failures.
Self-enhancing bias
Related to self-attribution bias, tendency to claim an irrational degree of credit for success.