Lecture 3 Flashcards
what is Ars erotica
Truth drawn from pleasure
■ Pleasure considered in relation to itself (not law or utility)
■ Knowledge deflected back into sexual practice to amplify its effects
■ Relationship of master to disciple
what is Scientia sexualis
the student speaking by confessing to the master
confession— most highly valued techniques for producing truth
confessor is also subject of statement
agency of domination is in the one who listens, rather than speaks
reconstruction
“… breaking with the traditions of the art erotics (master to disciple), our society has equipped itself with a sexualis…
what are the 2 types of sexual views
ars erotica (old) Scientia sexualis (new)
Sexuality and the Cultivation of Humanity (her book)
argues what
argues that the things presented to us require a lot of learning
our learning is shared by power relations and the perspectives that are dominant
emotions entail a great deal of learning arguing for liberal education— is worry that education has become only about the test, getting the degree, and getting a job to get money
education has lost its concern of forming citizens
argues for:
education for democratic citizenship
problem of unreflective citizens
what are Key Assumptions (Vivian Burr) about social constructionism
critical stance
■ historically and culturally specific
■ knowledge of the world is intersubjectively fabricated not objectively observed
■ constructions are bound up with particular power relations
what are the Areas of social construction
Behavior –
- Norms
- Categories –
- Placement of individuals within the categories –
what about behaviour
societies shape norms of behavior
what about norms
a) norms about sexuality itself that shape experience (e.g., appetite)
b) norms about evaluations within the category (e.g., what is desirable in a partner)
what about categories
basic sexual categories undergo social shaping
what about placement of individuals
maleness and femaleness linked to biological markers; not heterosexuality and homosexuality?
what are the points of Nussabaum’s Ancient Greek World
people will tell you that what is normal now (nuclear family) has always been, even if it hasn’t really
homosexuality back in the ancient times were normal, the “norm” that wasn’t supposed to be passed was the actual act itself
a person with exclusive preference to one sex was rare
the males were supposed to be dominant in the relationship for sure
why does sexuality of the ancient world matter to us?
… there are 3 points you need to get…
what is dimorphism
is the physical differences between males and females of the same species
what is “The Erosion of Sexual Dimorphism” purpse
trace implications for western religions of the postmodern shift from dimorphism to polymorphism
what is Gudorf’s thesis
sexual dimorphism cannot remain as the dominant paradigm for interpreting sexuality and in fact has given way to a more polymorphous concept today
what does Gudorf say about plymorphous sexuality
Polymorphous sexuality greatly increases the freedom that individuals exercise in terms of both sexual identity and sexual behavior, but that very freedom also exacts certain costs