lecture 18: the waitangi tribunal Flashcards
What are the pros and cons of the Waitangi Tribunal?
pros:
- enables extensive research to be carried out to provide an historical account of the claim
- also includes the consideration of the claimants relationhsip with other hapy and iwi in the claim area
- Parliament provided a legal process by which Māori Treaty claims could be investigated
cons:
- the findings are not binding
- cant comment on matters before parliament
What is the purpose of the Waitangi Tribunal and what outcomes can it provide
for Māori claimant groups?
primary purpose:
- to receive, report and recommend on alleged crown breaches of the principles of the treaty of waitangi
- once the tribunal has heard the claim that has been brought by a maori goup, the tribunal will produce a reprort for the government to consider
- the tribunal can generally only make non binding rather than binding recommendations to the crown on redress for what it considers to be valid claims
When was the Waitangi Tribunal established and what claims did it initially allow
for? How did the 1985 amendment to the Treaty of Waitangi Act in impact this?
- established in 1975, as an independent and impartial permanent commission of inquiry
Initially: - could only hear claims based on crown acts or omissions dating from 1975
After 1985: - when the treaty of waitangi act 1975 was amended that the tribunal could hear claims of crown breaches dating back to 6 february 1840
historical claims= district inquiries
Define a Treaty settlement.
agreed historical account, crown acknowledgements of treaty breach and a crown apology
When was the Tribunal established?
1975
Why was the Tribunal established and by
whom?
- consists of a chairperson, maori land court judges and other notable appointed persons
- established by matiu Rata
What is the role of the Tribunal?
tribunals are independent judicial bodies that resolve disputes over facts and law, and assess specific cases
What benefits and challenges do Māori
claimants experience as a result of the
Tribunal process?
- the tribunals establishment signified the crowns acceptance that the historical grievances of maori about crown actions that harmed whanau, hapu and iwi are real
- the tribunal does not always agree with maori claimants, including those who file urgent inquiries
What outcomes can the Tribunal offer and
are they effective for Māori?
–> district settlements
- begin with extensive crown apologies
- all settlement statutes then proceed to outline a process for financial and commercial redress and cultural redress recognising the claimant groups spiritual, cultural, historical and traditional associations with lands and waters
- many of the settlements have created novel redress mechanisms
–> collective settlements
- some significant settlements have been made between the crown and either a collective of iwi or maori nationally