Lecture 16- Language And Thought Flashcards
Unlike other animals, when humans think they often think in
The language they speak
If categories are socially constructed
Different cultures may construct different concepts and the language we speak plays a role in shaping how we think
What is the traditional view
- That thought has priority over language and languages are used to express thoughts we have
- Language of thought is similar to natural languages
What is the linguistic relativity hypothesis (Sapir-Whorf)
- Language determines thought
- Example: Iniuit people have more words for types of snow
- Not having a word for a concept makes it hard to understand
What’s the strong version of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
The language someone speaks determines how they think
What’s the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
The language someone speaks makes certain types of thought easy for them and other types difficult
What’s the very weak version of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
The language someone speaks affects how easily information can be encoded and remembered
Criticisms of the linguistic relativity hypothesis (Sapir-Whorf)
- Assumed that every aspect of language is reflected in thought
- Ignores that language can express concepts that they do not have single words for
- Ignores that language differences go together with cultural differences and cultural differences may be more important
Findings against the linguistic relativity hypothesis (Sapir-Whorf)
-Speakers if languages with very different colour vocabularies see colours in similar ways
Roberson et al (2000) measured colour categories between Bernimo tribe and English speakers, what did they find
- Found that across tasks categorical perception of colour was aligned with colour terms
- These results suggest that perception is guide by language categories
What did Fausey and Boroditsky 2010 find comparing intentional (agentive) and accidental (non-agentive) actions and how they are described (breaking vase)
- English speakers used more agentive descriptions than Spanish speakers when describing accidents
- English speakers remembered the correct person who performed the accident more than Spanish speakers
Boroditsky 2001 looked at time metaphors and found
English speakers speak about time horizontally, mandarin speakers speak about time vertically
Evaluation of Boroditsky 2001 time metaphors
Chen 2007- Mandarin speakers also use horizontal metaphors, failed to replicate findings
What was the Vygotsky hypothesis
-Language and thought are initially separate but gradually internal speech becomes the major form of thinking
What were Vygotsky’s three stages
- Language and thought separate
- Speech is connected to behaviour, words begin to precede action more often
- After age 7 speech becomes internalised