Judgement and Decision Making Flashcards

(103 cards)

1
Q

Define

Availability heuristic

A

a mental shortcut that relies on immediate examples that come to a given person’s mind when evaluating a specific topic, concept, method or decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define

Base rate

A

the proportion of individual in the population who show the behaviour of interest in a given psychological testing or assessment situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define

Belief bias

A

the tendency to judge the strength of arguments based on the plausibility of their conclusion rather than how strongly they support that conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define

Categorical syllogism

A

an argument consisting of exactly three categorical propositions (two premises and a conclusion) in which there appear a total of exactly three categorical terms, each of which is used exactly twice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define

Conclusion (of syllogism)

A

a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define

Conditional syllogism

A

It is one whose major premise is a conditional proposition and whose minor premise and conclusion are categorical propositions. It consists of the antecedent and the consequent for the truth of the hypothetical judgment lies in the truth of dependence between the two clauses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define

Confirmation bias

A

type of cognitive bias that involves favoring information that confirms your previously existing beliefs or biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define

Conjunction rule

A

Calculates the probability of two (or more) events BOTH happening

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define

Decisions

A

a conclusion or resolution reached after consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define

Deductive reasoning

A

the process of reasoning from one or more statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define

Dual systems approach

A

This is a concept that individuals have two different sets of decision-making processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define

Expected emotion

A

anticipated emotional states associated with a given decision that are never actually experienced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define

Expected utility theory

A

concerning people’s preferences with regard to choices that have uncertain outcomes (gambles)⁠—states that the subjective value associated with an individual’s gamble is the statistical expectation of that individual’s valuations of the outcomes of that gamble, where these valuations may differ from the dollar value of those outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define

Falsification principle

A

proposed by scientific philosopher Karl Popper. It proposes that for something to be scientific it must be be able to be proven false. If things are falsifiable (able to possibly be proven false) then they can be used in scientific studies and inquiry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define

Framing effect

A

a cognitive bias where people decide on options based on whether the options are presented with positive or negative connotations; e.g. as a loss or as a gain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define

Heuristics

A

the strategies derived from previous experiences with similar problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define

Illusory correlation

A

the phenomenon of perceiving a relationship between variables (typically people, events, or behaviors) even when no such relationship exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define

Incidental emotions

A

the emotions we carry with us to the decision that have nothing to do with the decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Define

Inductive reasoning

A

a method of reasoning in which the premises are viewed as supplying some evidence for the truth of the conclusion; this is in contrast to deductive reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Define

Law of large numbers

A

a theorem that describes the result of performing the same experiment a large number of times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Define

Mental model

A

an explanation of someone’s thought process about how something works in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define

Myside bias

A

occurs when people evaluate evidence, generate evidence, and test hypotheses in a manner biased toward their own prior opinions and attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Define

Neuroeconomics

A

an interdisciplinary field that seeks to explain human decision making, the ability to process multiple alternatives and to follow a course of action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Define

Opt-in procedure

A

The consumer enables direct marketing communication by subscribing in a list or sending a query that he is willing to receive advertisements via e-mail, SMS, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
# Define Opt-out procedure
Consumers who are not interested in particular marketing measures, or in direct marketing measures in general, can subscribe to a list, which is checked by commercial address brokers
26
# Define Premise
a previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.
27
# Define Reasoning
the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way
28
# Define Representativeness heuristic
assessing similarity of objects and organizing them based around the category prototype (e.g., like goes with like, and causes and effects should resemble each other)
29
# Define Risk aversion
the behavior of humans (especially consumers and investors), who, when exposed to uncertainty, attempt to lower that uncertainty
30
# Define Social exchange theory
a sociological and psychological theory that studies the social behavior in the interaction of two parties that implement a cost-benefit analysis to determine risks and benefits
31
# Define Wason four-card problem
a logic puzzle devised by Peter Cathcart Wason in 1966. It is one of the most famous tasks in the study of deductive reasoning
32
# Definition a mental shortcut that relies on immediate examples that come to a given person's mind when evaluating a specific topic, concept, method or decision
Availability heuristic
33
# Definition the proportion of individual in the population who show the behaviour of interest in a given psychological testing or assessment situation
Base rate
34
# Definition the tendency to judge the strength of arguments based on the plausibility of their conclusion rather than how strongly they support that conclusion
Belief bias
35
# Definition an argument consisting of exactly three categorical propositions (two premises and a conclusion) in which there appear a total of exactly three categorical terms, each of which is used exactly twice
Categorical syllogism
36
# Definition a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true
Conclusion (of syllogism)
37
# Definition It is one whose major premise is a conditional proposition and whose minor premise and conclusion are categorical propositions. It consists of the antecedent and the consequent for the truth of the hypothetical judgment lies in the truth of dependence between the two clauses
Conditional syllogism
38
# Definition type of cognitive bias that involves favoring information that confirms your previously existing beliefs or biases
Confirmation bias
39
# Definition Calculates the probability of two (or more) events BOTH happening
Conjunction rule
40
# Definition a conclusion or resolution reached after consideration
Decisions
41
# Definition the process of reasoning from one or more statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion
Deductive reasoning
42
# Definition This is a concept that individuals have two different sets of decision-making processes
Dual systems approach
43
# Definition anticipated emotional states associated with a given decision that are never actually experienced
Expected emotion
44
# Definition concerning people's preferences with regard to choices that have uncertain outcomes (gambles)⁠—states that the subjective value associated with an individual's gamble is the statistical expectation of that individual's valuations of the outcomes of that gamble, where these valuations may differ from the dollar value of those outcomes
Expected utility theory
45
# Definition proposed by scientific philosopher Karl Popper. It proposes that for something to be scientific it must be be able to be proven false. If things are falsifiable (able to possibly be proven false) then they can be used in scientific studies and inquiry
Falsification principle
46
# Definition a cognitive bias where people decide on options based on whether the options are presented with positive or negative connotations; e.g. as a loss or as a gain
Framing effect
47
# Definition the strategies derived from previous experiences with similar problems
Heuristics
48
# Definition the phenomenon of perceiving a relationship between variables (typically people, events, or behaviors) even when no such relationship exists
Illusory correlation
49
# Definition the emotions we carry with us to the decision that have nothing to do with the decision
Incidental emotions
50
# Definition a method of reasoning in which the premises are viewed as supplying some evidence for the truth of the conclusion; this is in contrast to deductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning
51
# Definition a theorem that describes the result of performing the same experiment a large number of times
Law of large numbers
52
# Definition an explanation of someone's thought process about how something works in the real world
Mental model
53
# Definition occurs when people evaluate evidence, generate evidence, and test hypotheses in a manner biased toward their own prior opinions and attitudes
Myside bias
54
# Definition an interdisciplinary field that seeks to explain human decision making, the ability to process multiple alternatives and to follow a course of action
Neuroeconomics
55
# Definition The consumer enables direct marketing communication by subscribing in a list or sending a query that he is willing to receive advertisements via e-mail, SMS, etc.
Opt-in procedure
56
# Definition Consumers who are not interested in particular marketing measures, or in direct marketing measures in general, can subscribe to a list, which is checked by commercial address brokers
Opt-out procedure
57
# Definition a previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.
Premise
58
# Definition the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way
Reasoning
59
# Definition assessing similarity of objects and organizing them based around the category prototype (e.g., like goes with like, and causes and effects should resemble each other)
Representativeness heuristic
60
# Definition the behavior of humans (especially consumers and investors), who, when exposed to uncertainty, attempt to lower that uncertainty
Risk aversion
61
# Definition a sociological and psychological theory that studies the social behavior in the interaction of two parties that implement a cost-benefit analysis to determine risks and benefits
Social exchange theory
62
# Definition a logic puzzle devised by Peter Cathcart Wason in 1966. It is one of the most famous tasks in the study of deductive reasoning
Wason four-card problem
63
What is reasoning?
Evaluating only the information given
64
What is judgement?
Reasoin using given information but going beyond to make a conclusion. Requires abstractation from the information or discerning a pattern
65
What is decision making?
Evaluating given information (like reasoning), making a judgement and then choosing between alternatives
66
What is bounded rationality?
Bounded rationality is the idea that in decision-making, rationality of individuals is limited by the information they have, the cognitive limitations of their minds, and the finite amount of time they have to make a decision
67
What does the Iowa Gambling Task reveal about the decision-making of substace users?
Tend to be biased toward small immediate gains at the cost of larger losses over time
68
What is inductive reasoning?
Making judgments on the basis of observations, or reaching conclusions from evidence
69
True or False: In inductive reasoning, the conclusion is probably, but not definitely true
True
70
True or False: In deductive reasoning, the conclusion is probably, but not definitely true
False The conclusion must be correct if the premises are correct
71
What are some examples of inductive reasoning?
Analogical reasoning Hypothesis testing
72
What type of reasoning is involved in this task?
Analogical reasoning
73
What does analogical reasoning involve?
Using a relationship between two variables as the basis of a relationship between two other variables
74
This task is testing what type of reasoning? A is to B as C is to \_\_\_
Analogical reasoning
75
What does analogical reasoning performance depend on?
* Complication of individual terms * Knowledge of the reasoner * Ease of finding a relationship between A and B * Load on memory
76
What does hypothesis testing involve?
Hypothesis testing involves going from the particular (i.e. sample) to the general (i.e. population)
77
True or False: Hypotheses cannot be confirmed as true, but they can be shown not to be true
True
78
How do laypeople perform on the following task? You are given the numbers 2, 4 and 6 and are told that this triplet of numbers follows a rule, which you have to identify; you are told that the experimenter had a rule in mind
People guessed, but tended to just look for evidence for what they were thinking rather than trying to disprove their ideas * This strategy belies a tendency to strive toward proving one’s hypothesis instead of disproving it (called confirmation bias) * Only 20% of participants solved the problem without error * Numbers were ascending
79
What factors influence reasoning?
Effects of premise phrasing (positive or negatives) Quantifiers (all/none easier than some) The order in which a propositions are presented also affects comprehension Alteration of premise meaning Failure to consier all possibilities Myside bias
80
All A’s are B’s Some B’s are C’s Which of these diagrams represents this premise information?
They are both possibly with the given information
81
Watching a debate and taking the side of the issue you always take regardless of the evidence is an example of what type of bias?
Myside bias
82
What are some examples of heuristics and biases?
Myside Availability Recognition Representativeness Confirmation etc.
83
People tend to be more afraid to ride in planes than cars despite more people dying in car accidents. What is this an example of?
Availability bias Media covers more plane crashes than car crashes
84
The _________ heuristic proposes that we evaluate the probability or likelihood of an event by judging the ease with which relevant instances come to mind
The **availability** heuristic proposes that we evaluate the probability or likelihood of an event by judging the ease with which relevant instances come to mind
85
The __________ heuristic operates when we assess the degree to which the object of our attention is similar to, or represents, our basic idea (or stereotype) of that object
The **representativeness** heuristic operates when we assess the degree to which the object of our attention is similar to, or represents, our basic idea (or stereotype) of that object
86
Which type of reasoning involves formal rules of proof?
Deductive reasoning
87
What are the types of deductive reasoning?
Conditional reasoning Conditional syllogisms
88
In conditional *reasoning/syllogisms* premises are combined to create arguments
In conditional **reasoning** premises are combined to create arguments
89
True or False: Conditional reasoning requires both confirming and disconfirming evidence
True
90
Conditional *reasoning/syllogisms* presents two or more premises and requires that we determine whether the conclusion is true or false
Conditional **syllogisms** presents two or more premises and requires that we determine whether the conclusion is true or false
91
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ present premises that deal with classes of entities
**Categorical syllogisms** present premises that deal with classes of entities
92
“All golden retrievers are dogs” and “No polar bears are inanimate objects” are examples of what?
Conditional syllogisms
93
True or False: If all red books are astronomy books and all astronomy books are large then all red books are large
True
94
All mammals are animals All dogs are mammals Therefore, all dogs are animals What type of reasoning is this an example of?
Syllogistic reasoning
95
What is/are the primary component(s) of decision-making? Select one: a. Evaluating the given information b. Making a judgement c. Choosing between alternatives d. All of the above
What is/are the primary component(s) of decision-making? Select one: a. Evaluating the given information b. Making a judgement c. Choosing between alternatives **d. All of the above**
96
Inductive reasoning goes from the ___________ to the \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_, and therefore _____________ add knowledge. ## Footnote **Options:** * adds* * external* * specific* * internal* * general* * does not add*
Inductive reasoning goes from the **specific** to the **general**, and therefore **adds** knowledge.
97
All spiders have 8 legs. A black widow is a spider. Therefore, black widows have 8 legs. This is a form of _______ reasoning.
All spiders have 8 legs. A black widow is a spider. Therefore, black widows have 8 legs. This is a form of **deductive** reasoning.
98
The first lolly you pull out of a bowl is strawberry flavoured. The next lolly you pull out is also strawberry flavoured. Therefore, every lolly in that bowl is strawberry flavoured. This is a form of ________ reasoning.
The first lolly you pull out of a bowl is strawberry flavoured. The next lolly you pull out is also strawberry flavoured. Therefore, every lolly in that bowl is strawberry flavoured. This is a form of **inductive** reasoning.
99
Analogical reasoning uses the relationship between two variables as the basis of a relationship between two other variables. An example of this is: Select one: a. Snake is to scaly as dog is to furry b. Snake is to scaly as dog is to Jack Russell c. Snake is to scaly as dog is to cute d. Snake is to scaly as dog is to happy
Analogical reasoning uses the relationship between two variables as the basis of a relationship between two other variables. An example of this is: Select one: **a. Snake is to scaly as dog is to furry** b. Snake is to scaly as dog is to Jack Russell c. Snake is to scaly as dog is to cute d. Snake is to scaly as dog is to happy
100
True or false: A hypothesis can be confirmed as true and can be confirmed not to be true.
False
101
Andrew believes that drinking lemon juice can cure the common cold. He Googles his hypothesis and reads all of the information that states lemon juice can cure the common cold. He ignores all pages that state lemon juice cannot cure the common cold. Andrew is experiencing: Select one: a. Schema shift b. The confirmation bias c. Cognitive dissonance d. Disconfirming evidence
Andrew believes that drinking lemon juice can cure the common cold. He Googles his hypothesis and reads all of the information that states lemon juice can cure the common cold. He ignores all pages that state lemon juice cannot cure the common cold. Andrew is experiencing: Select one: a. Schema shift **b. The confirmation bias** c. Cognitive dissonance d. Disconfirming evidence
102
“I knew this would happen!” is an example of: Select one or more: Hindsight bias Availability bias Recognition bias Confirmation bias
“I knew this would happen!” is an example of: Select one or more: **Hindsight bias** Availability bias Recognition bias Confirmation bias
103
True or false: In conditional reasoning, the final truth value of an argument depends on the truth of an individual premise. Categorical syllogisms present two or more premises and require us to determine whether the conclusion is true or false.
True