Functionalism Flashcards

1
Q

Functionalist View

A

Crime is func & necessary - would still be crime & deviance in Soc of saints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Boundary Maintenance

Durkheim

A

Reinforces VC via policing margins - formal & informal sanctions = reward / punish dev - shared disapproval of behav strengthens soc solidarity
Crime maintains boundaries - what is acceptable made known by arrest of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social Change

Durkheim

A

Leads to social change = organic process started where Soc responds positively to dev behav - becomes normal eg changes to law on homo in 20th C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Safety Valve

Davis

A

Safety valve - Davies said dev acts as SV eg prostitution as a release for male sexual tension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Warning Signs

Clinard / Cohen

A

an inc in certain type of crim / dev can = indicator of something in soc X function properly & change = needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Durkheim A03

A

Doesn’t quantify how much enough crime is
Macro approach ignores indu impact doesn’t say why some m likely to commit crime
Doesn’t always promote solidarity - can lead to isolation
Assumes ppl follow the masses
Ignores concept of power - who makes laws - Marxism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Realist Criticism of Durkheim

A

Criticise idea that crime = normal & func
Crime = v real problem for victims & that the socio of crime should inform policy makers how to prevent crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Merton’s Strain Theory

A

Everyone = socialised to ach American Dream - consensus = success & material wealth should = goals no equal access to goals= strain between Soc encour goals & Soc acceptable means of achieving them
Ppl socialised to believing that to achieve had to work hard = meritocracy - ppl made adaptations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conformity

Adaptations

A

Mems of Soc conform success & goals & normative means of reaching them - strive via accepted channels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Innovation

Adaptations

A

Reject normative means of achievement turn to dev means in particular crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ritualism

Adaptations

A

= dev - largely abandon commonly held success goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Retreatism

Adaptations

A

Applies to psychotics, autists, pariahs, outcasts, vagrants, vagabonds, tramps, drunks & drug addicts - have strongly internalised both cul goals & institutionalised means yet = unable to achieve success so give up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rebellion

Adaptations

A

Rejection of success goals & institutionalised means = replaced by dif goals & means eg Marx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Merton A03

A

Deterministic
Takes crime stats at face value
Assumes goal & value consensus
Only talks about utilitarian crimes for monetary gain
Ignores group delinquency
Doesn’t consider who goals fav - work hard - money - cap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Positive Evaluation Merton

A

Explains anomie in a detailed way = product of strain between Soc accepted goals & Soc accepted means of achieving them
Based on 20 C US but is transferrable to any western, developed capitalist country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hirschi Bonds of Attachment (1969)

A

= 4 BofA that keep ppl linked to value consensus & ensure social control & order
Means those who don’t have family attachments, work commitments, get involved in school / have a clear moral code - someone marginalised & young

17
Q

Attachment.

A

How much do we care about what others think?
Might particularly care what spouse / children think

18
Q

Commitment

Bonds of Attachment

A

What have we got to lose?
Eg job - committing crime puts a lot at risk

19
Q

Involvement

A

How involved are we w/ Soc - what takes up our time? If we work are we involved in group hobbies etc would we have time to commit crime?

20
Q

Belief

A

To what extent do we believe following the law is the right thing to do?
How strong is our personal moral code?

21
Q

Hirschi Positive A03

A

Asks what stops ppl offending = useful intros ideas how to prevent & ach Soc order - has influ policy makers = interested in how can promo attachment can be encour & dev red

22
Q

Hirschi Negative A03

A

Doesn’t address why some have secure BofAs & why others = marg - Ms & Fems - no value consensus which benefits all - Soc is chara by conflict
Cap produces detached marg indus delib - creates unemploy reserve army of labour - keeps wages down

23
Q

Status Frustration - The Delinquent Sub Culture

A

Cohen argued Merton = flawed:
1. Delinq = col X indu respon - join together = col respon
2. Cul dep accounts for WC underach = few avs to ach
3. doesn’t account for non utilitarian crime WC boys suffer SF - want to be successful but lack quals & skills - reject Soc & create own n’s & v’s in gang = active non-U crim - V’s tend to be the reverse of mainstream v’s

24
Q

Cohen A03

A

develops ST = explan for non-U crime together = func for wide range of dev behav
idea sub culs consciously invert N’s & V’s of mainstream = crit if smash a bus shelter = unlikely conciously think soc would X
Lyng & Katz - indu m influ by boredom - seek buzz - could argue delinqs can = concious of how dev acts might provide access to rewards & status w/in group

25
Q

Cohen Ignores Gender & Class

A

Specifically links WC boys = v few links to class/gender - why do WC boys struggle to attain status at school in mainstream soc - Willis addresses but C doesn’t
Why boys if bc of SF many fems would argue in 1950s US girls would be the ones you would expect to create sub culs - cohen doesn’t explain whole situation

26
Q

Focal Concerns

A

Miller
WC have dif set of values / FCs - include hyper masc - can lead to crim behav seeming normal

27
Q

Miller Evaluation

A

not all WC = crims
Matza sub cul membership = short lived

28
Q

Cloward & Ohlin

A

accept m of M’s views - but failed to expl dif forms of dev
M only expl by legit oppur struc - didn’t consid illegit struc - access to illegit means success varies too
in WC = greater pressure on mems of WC to dev bc have less oppur to suceed by legit means

29
Q

Criminal Sub Cultures

A

tend to emerge in areas where = established pattern of org adult crime = learning environ for young - exposed to crim skills & dev values = crim role models - mainly concerned w/ utilitarian crime

30
Q

Conflict Sub Cultures

A

gangs organised by young ppl often based on claiming territory from other gangs = turf war

31
Q

Retreatist Sub Cultures

A

org around drug use bc have failed to suceed in both the legit & illegit strucs - have failed in conflict & crim sub culs so retreat to own sub culture

32
Q

C&O Evaluation

A

only looks at WC crime & crims
sub culs = distinct & sep
Matza - sub culs membership = temp
WC ppl have own sep sub cul w/ own values & indepen of mainstrean - Miller