Farm Skills: Ovine Johne's disease Flashcards
What clinical sign of Johnes is seen in cattle but NOT in sheep? Why is this?
- Cattle with Johnes show profuse watery diarrhoea but sheep do not
- This is probably because sheep can resorb a high quantity of water in the distal colon
- If diarrhoea is seen in sheep with Johnes, it is intermittent and mainly associated with concurrent diseases
Clinical signs of Johnes in sheep
- Severe weight loss
- Submandibular oedema due to hypoproteinaemia
- Wool break
- Normal or increased appetite
- Reduction in general immunity (which might predispose to bacterial infection, high parasite burden etc.)
How does susceptibility to MAP change over a sheep’s lifetime?
Susceptibility decreases with age - sheep are most susceptible in the first few months of life
When do sheep show clinical signs of Johnes?
Clinical signs are seen in sheep >2 y.o.
* Usually appear following stressful events e.g. lambing, lactation, nutritional deficiency or transport
What is the main route of infection for Ovine Johnes?
Main route of infection: faeco-oral
Other ways sheep can become infected:
* Mammary secretions
* Some evidence for intrauterine and venereal transmission but this is less important
Ovine Johne’s presents as ill-thrift in adult animals. What other differentials do you have for this?
- Nutritional deficiency
- Parasitic gastroenteritis (PGE)
- Chronic liver fluke
- Periodontitis
- Ovine Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma (OPA)
- Maedi Visna
- Caseous Lymphadenitis (CLA)
- Intestinal adenocarcinoma
- Other chronic infection e.g. pneumonia, mastitis
Which strains of Johne’s affect sheep and cattle?
- Sheep are primarily infected by S strains (Type I and Type III)
- Cattle are usually infected by C strains (Type II) but may be affected by sheep strains
- Cross-infection occurs experimentally but its importance in practice is under debate
Which strains of Johne’s affect goats?
Goats are easily infected with both C and S strains
What are the possible outcomes when an animal becomes infected with MAP? What influences this?
Depends on pathogenicity of MAP strain, dose and frequency of exposure, and host immune response and susceptibility.
Options:
* Animal may develop resistance to infection after MAP exposure
* Animal may become infected, and shed bacteria asymptomatically
* Animal may become infected and develop clinical disease
True/false: controlling Fasciola hepatica may have implications for Johne’s control.
True
* Research ongoing, but fascioliasis / PGE may dyregulate protective immunity against mycobacterial infection
* It has been suggested that co-infection of MAP with Fasciola hepatica could accelerate development of Johne’s
True/false: it is safe for humans to eat and drink milk from animals infected with Johne’s.
False
* Meat and milk from animals infected with Johne’s is usually contaminated. Methods such as pasteurisation can reduce bacterial load but not eliminate it entirely.
* There is not yet a causative link between Crohn’s and infected animal products but it is advisable to reduce human exposure to MAP
True/false: low albumin is seen with Johne’s and diagnosis can be made on the basis of this.
False
* Low albumin is seen consistently with Johne’s even before clinical signs
* However this finding is not specific to OJD alone
What are the advantages and disadvantages of serum ELISA for OJD testing?
Serum ELISA
✅ Low cost
✅ Highly specific (94-99%) - we can trust that a positive is a truly infected animal
❌ Low sensitivity (14-21%) - we cannot trust a negative result as being rruly negative
ELISA can be performed on blood (most commonly) or colostrum.
What is considered the gold standard test for OJD? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
Gold standard = Faecal culture
✅ Can identify infected animals and those shedding the highest doses of MAP
❌ Very expensive
❌ Long turnaround time; sheep strains even harder and slower to grow than cattle
❌ Possible false positives due to passive shedding of MAP (esp on highly contaminated farm, or where super shedders are present)
What are the advantages and disadvantages of faecal PCR for detection of OJD?
✅ Higher sensitivity (30-60%) than ELISA in subclinical cases
✅ More rapid and sensitive than faecal culture
❌ High cost
❌ Potential false +ves due to environmental mycobacteria