exam ii: ch8 Flashcards

1
Q

blueprint or detailed plan for conducting a study

A

research design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what provides the basis of a research design? (3)

A

purpose, review of literature, and framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cause and effect relationship between variables

A

causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cause + effect relationship between interrelating variables = change in dep variable

A

multicausality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the likelihood of accurately predicting an event

A

probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

slanting of findings away from what is true/expected, can distort the findings

A

bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what type of research has the strongest control?

A

experimental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

having the power to manipulate factors for desired outcome; method to reduce bias, improve accuracy, implemented throughout design

A

control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

form of control used in quasi-experimental/experimental studies; implemental of a treatment or intervention

A

manipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the 5 elements of a strong design?

A

controlling…
- environment
- equivalence of subjects
- tx
- measurement
- extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

measure of the truth/accuracy of the findings obtained from a study

A

study validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

type of validity that begins with the fit between the conceptual and operational definitions of variables

A

construct validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

type of validity that measure the extent to which the study findings are a true reflection of reality, rather than the result of extraneous variables

A

internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

concerned with the extent to which study findings can be generalized beyond the sample used in the study.

A

external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

concerned with whether the conclusions about relationships or differences drawn from statistical analysis are an accurate reflection of the real world

A

statistical conclusion validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explain the following threats to construct validity:
- inadequate definition of variables
- mono-operation bias
- mono-method bias
- experimental expectancy bias
- social desirability

A

Inadequate definition of variables: lack of clear + operational definitions may = not congruent/inappropriate measurements

Mono-operation bias: each variable measured with one instrument/scale

Mono-method bias: only one measurement method is used to measure study variable

Experimental expectancy bias: researcher’s expectations or bias may influence data collection

Social desirability: participants select answers based on wanting researcher to like them/based on behaviors that are perceived as positive

17
Q

explain the following threats to internal validity
- nonrandom participant selection
- nonrandom assignment to groups
- participant attrition
- unrelated event affecting the findings
- participant maturation

A

Nonrandom participant selection: participants selected by nonrandom sampling – unique characteristics that may influence study findings

Nonrandom assignment to groups: participants are placed in groups using nonrandom sampling in an interventional study, characteristics of the groups may influence the findings

Participant attrition: percentage of participants withdrawing from longitudinal study is >20%. The participants withdrew may be different from those who complete

Unrelated event affecting the findings: unrelated event that may affect (history, ex covid)

Participant maturation: participants become more experienced, wiser, or tired over the course of a study, which may influence the data collected

18
Q

explain the following threats to conclusion validity
- low statistical power
- unreliable measurement methods
- intervention fidelity concerns
- extraneous variables in study

A

Low statistical power: conclusion is drawn that there are no sig differences or relationships when one exists (type 2 error)

Unreliable measurement methods: scales/measures used in a study are not consistently measuring study variables

Intervention fidelity concerns: not consistently implemented, may make detecting differences difficult

Extraneous variables in study: setting not controlled in study, which may affect responses

19
Q

explain the following threats to external validity
- homogeneity in noninterventional study
- interaction of sample and setting
- interaction of selection + intervention
- interaction of history and intervention

A

Homogeneity in a noninterventional study: sample recruited was unique and does not reflect larger population

Interaction of sample and setting in the noninterventional study: the sample and the setting combined in a way that resulted in a unique sample that does not reflect larger population

Interaction of selection + intervention: participants decline to participate because of the commitment or effort the test requires. the sample does not reflect larger

Interaction of history and intervention: event that occurs in the setting affects the implementation of the intervention and data collection

20
Q

type of study that seeks to gain more information about concepts, variables, or elements in a particular field of study.

A

descriptive studies

21
Q

type of descriptive design used to examine variables in a single sample

A

simple descriptive design

22
Q

type of descriptive design that examines differences in variables in 2+ groups that occur naturally in a setting

A

comparative descriptive design

23
Q

examine relationships between or among two or more variables in a single group in a study.

A

correlational design

24
Q

type of correlational design that describes variables and examines relationships

A

descriptive correlational design

25
Q

type of correlational design that predicts the value of one variable based on the values obtained for another variable/variables

A

predictive correlational design

26
Q

type of research design that has untreated control group with pretest/posttest

A

quasi experimental design

27
Q

groups in comparative descriptive studies

A

study groups

28
Q

uses large # of subjects to test a treatment’s effect and compare results with a control group who did not receive the treatment
- randomization is ESSENTIAL
- multiple geographic locations
- subjects come from reference population

A

randomized controlled trial

29
Q

t/f: research designs should be developed to reduce likelihood of bias

A

true