Exam 3 - Study Guide Flashcards
Why do we do performance appraisal?
- Administrative: for personnel decisions, legal requirements
- Developmental: assess individuals strengths and weaknesses, provide feedback, set goals, identify training needs
360 degree feedback; also, understand the administration issues and feedback report related to implementing a 360-degree appraisal system (see Figure 7-12)
Solicits information for performance evaluation simultaneously from multiple sources, such as external customers, internal customers, selling team members, sales assistants, the sales manager, and the salesperson him- or herself.
Separate results from different sources; shows self ratings in comparison to other ratings (self perception vs perception of others)
Compare ratings with other norm groups
understand the administration issues and feedback report related to implementing a 360-degree appraisal system
- Select raters by using representative sample of those critical (and who have observed) the one being rated
- Adequate number of raters for an adequate sample; or elicit ratings from all qualified sources
- Instruct respondents on how data will be used and ensure confidentiality
- Alert and train raters regarding errors
- Raters should not indicate their names to ensure confidentiality
Understand the factors that influence performance
Ability
Motivation
environment
Error of central tendency:
rate everyone around average of scale
Leniency or error:
Leniency or error: unusually high ratings for everyone (leniency);
strictness error:
strictness error: unusually low ratings for everyone (strictness)
Recency error:
focus on what happened most recently
Contrast errors
Contrast errors: comparing individuals against each other
halo/horns error:
halo/horns error: reacts to one positive aspect then generalizes positivity to other aspects
How to conduct effective performance reviews (i.e., performance feedback sessions)?
Before review: prepare thoroughly; give yourself a self assessment; consider tie and place in scheduling
During review: discuss strengths and weaknesses; set joint goals; encourage participation and listen carefully; set follow up meetings
Know different types of performance appraisal including their advantages and disadvantages
Trait performance appraisal: subjective; focuses on the individual characteristics that are important to the job and the company
Pro: inexpensive, easy to use
Con: potential for error, poor feedback
Behavior
BARS: use of several behavioral anchors (1-low,3-average,5-high); behavioral descriptions with point along a scale
BOS: how frequently behavior occurs; use of behavior statement (always, sometimes, never)
Pro: more objective, accepted by employees, useful for feedback, ok for reward/promotion
Con: time consuming, costly
Results of performance appraisals: MBO- objectives and goal setting
Understand management by objectives
Appraisal system that calls for a comparison between specific, quantifiable target goals and actual results
Steps of MBO
Steps of MBO
Employee and employer set joint goals
Provide regular feedback
Discuss achievement of joint goals
Strategic relevance:
performance standards linked to organizational goals and competencies
Standards reliability:
measures that are consistent across raters and over time
Criterion deficiency:
aspects of actual performance that are not measured
Criterion contamination:
elements that affect the appraisal measures that are not part of the actual performance (measure when it should not have been)
Understand the objectives of pay system
- Motivating
- Equitable
- Attractive
- Complies with laws and regulation
- Strategic (pay system reflects objectives)
Understand equity theory and employee reactions to inequity
Comparing your own output/input ratio to the output/input ratio of others to see if they are equal and fair or unequal and unfair
types of compensation
Cash:
wages/salaries, commissions, bonuses, gain sharing
Fringe:
Time not worked, insurance plans, security plans, employee services
Internal consistency
- Based on job analysis and evaluation (relative worth of job)
- To assure internal equity
- Compared different jobs in same organization
External competitiveness
- Compares same jobs in other organizations
- Use of market survey
- Determined by organizational influences