Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

353 > EIA Midterm Study Cards > Flashcards

EIA Midterm Study Cards Flashcards

1
Q

The WHAT of EA

A
  1. Process that recognizes environmental impacts
  2. Planning tool for info-gathering and decision making
  3. Provides decision-maker with objective basis for approval/denial
  4. Provides plan for follow-up
  5. Proposes mitigation for environmental impacts
  6. Multi-disciplinary: ecology, law, culture, management, economics
  7. Gathers info for future decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The WHO of EA

A
  1. Involves many types of people:
  2. 1st Nations
  3. Governments
  4. Community/Public
  5. Proponents
  6. Decision makers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The WHY of EA

A
  1. To try and stop impacts before they happen
  2. To be critically aware of our impacts on land/water/other animals/other people
  3. “Meet the goals of sustainability”
  4. Ensure concerns of all people involved/effected are considered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(BCEAA) BC Environmental Assessment Act

A

Policy, procedures and technical guidelines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The WHEN of EA

A

When a project is proposed that triggers an EA OR is given an EA by the Minister
Began in 1970 in US and 1972 in Canada

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why study EA?

A
  1. Plan more effectively in future
  2. Shows human values
  3. To find & correct flaws within EA process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

EAO

A

Environmental Assessment Office

  1. Reviews projects
  2. Reports findings
  3. Gives recommendations
  4. Writes up project conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EA Process

A
  1. Project proposal (description)
  2. Scoping: all env. data collected (triggers)
  3. Application info requirements
  4. App evaluated for completeness
  5. App review & Public input component
  6. Assessment report (public input and actual findings)
  7. App sent to ministers and decision is made
  8. IF APPROVED: certification issued, monitoring, enforcement

VERY subjective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Major projects that trigger EA’s

A
  1. Industrial projects (chemical and metal manufacturing)
  2. Logging projects
  3. Energy projects
  4. Mining projects
  5. Water management/infrastucture
  6. Waste management/infrastructure
  7. Food processing projects
  8. Transportation Projects
  9. Tourist destinations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ministerial Designation

A

Minister of Environment has authority to have projects reviewed if it is believed to have adverse environmental, economic, health, social or heritage effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Federal Gov’t is involved if…

A
  1. Fed authority is the proponent
  2. Fed $$ is involved
  3. Project involves land that fed. authority has interest in
  4. Any aspect of the project needs fed. approval/authorization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Harmonization

A

When fed. and prov. EA’s are triggered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MOU on Substitution of EA’s

A

Memorandum of Understanding

Substitution: Under CEAA, there can be a single review but 2 decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

BC EAO

A 
Based in Victoria
Started 1995
133 out of 263 projects have been approved
30 days to review applications
Have ability to suspend timelines
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

GHG emission reduction targets

A

2020: 33% less than 2007
2050: 80% less than 2007
No link to EA process at all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

“Climate tests”

A
  • If a project emits more that X emissions, it triggers an EA (Rosanna and Erin)
  • Scope of EA’s should include full life cycle of emissions: emissions from extraction, transport and use @ final destination
  • Include the consideration of a “zero option” (scenario without the project)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

“Significant impacts”

A

MAJOR issue in EA because lots of projects get away with adverse impacts because they are deemed “not significant”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Trade off’s in EA

A

Efficiency VS. Thoroughness
Flexibility: can be good or bad
Lenience on certain projects: can cause conflict
Balancing guidelines, circumstances and people’s concerns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Pros/cons of Proponent-led process

A

Pros:
-Saves tax payer money
-Allows proponent to fully understand impacts of project
-Reduces complication of process: if gov’t was following process as it went it would have many more steps
Cons:
-EA proposal could be biased because proponents hire scientists to do studies
-Proponent could pay people to make project get approved even though it has adverse impacts

20
Q

FPIC

A

Free Prior Informed Consent
Recognizes indigenous peoples rights to their lands and
resources and respects their authority to enter into an equal
and respectful relationship with them, based on informed consent

21
Q

Haida & Taku

A

WHY: resulted in “duty to consult and accomodate”
WHAT: Mining road through critical caribou habitat
WHEN: 2004
WHO: Haida and Tlingit tribes and Supreme court
WHERE: BC

22
Q

“Duty to consult and accommodate”

A

Gov’t MUST consult any 1st nations peoples if a project is proposed on their territory
IF EA gets approved/there is adverse impacts, the proponent make royalty payments, education, work or cash compensation or provision of alternative lands

23
Q

Red Chris Mine

A

WHY: Fed. authority tried to change scope so they wouldn’t have to conduct public hearings AND so an EA would only be triggered for tailing pond and use of explosives. Led to law preventing anyone to change the scope of a project to get around mandatory parts of an EA
WHO: Talhtan 1st Nations, Imperial Metals, DFO and NRC (natural resources canada)
WHAT: Open-pit copper, silver & gold mine
WHEN: Approved under CEAA in 2006
WHERE: “Sacred Headwaters” Skeena, Stikine & Naas watershed

24
Q

Prosperity & New Prosperity Mine

A

WHY: Drew attention to concerns with BC’s EAO and process - Prov. said yes and Fed. said hell no
WHO: Taseko, Chilcotin & Xeni Gwi’tin, BC EAO and Fed. Gov’t
WHAT: Gold-copper mine rejected twice under CEAA
WHEN: 2015
WHERE: BC

25
Q

Jackpine Mine Expansion

A

WHY: one of the 1st reviews approved under new CEAA (2012) policy “projects with sig. adverse effects can be justified under the circumstances” - Justified for whom?
WHO: Nation Energy Board, Fed. Gov’t
WHAT: Oil-sands expansion, 23 lakes acidified, Bison&Caribou habitat destoyed, 18% of wetlands in region effected, human respiratory effects
WHEN: 2014
WHERE: Alberta

26
Q

Reasons EA’s were created

A
  1. growing concerns about env. and impacts of develpoment
  2. Silent Spring, DDT, new pollutants, post-WWII increase in development, smog, etc.
  3. failure of existing regulatory approach of early 1900’s
27
Q

5 early efforts to enforce sustainability

A
  1. CORE (commission on resource and env. land use planning)
  2. Forest practices code 1994
  3. Mineral exploration code
  4. Provincial parks increased from 5 to 15%
  5. Rejection of Windy Craggy mine
28
Q

Ed Begley Jr.

A

“I don’t understand why when we destroy something created by man we call it vandalism but when we destroy something created by nature we call it progress”

29
Q

Wreck Cove

A

WHY: Shows how vulnerable EIA system is to strong proponent & political/economic power, shows how weak EIA enforcement used to be, 2nd major undertaking under the EARP,example of how NOT to do an EA – so much manipulation involved
WHO: FEARO, EARP, Nova Scotia Power Corporation
WHAT: 11 hydroelectric dams on 5 rivers, corrupt, McLaren Report edited down from 17 to 9 pages
WHEN:began 1950’s, haulted 1956, began again in 1974
WHERE: Nova Scotia, Cape Breton Highlands National Park

30
Q

Rafferty-Alameda and Oldman Dams

A

WHAT: 2 dams to supply water to arid regions
WHERE: Sask and Alberta, rivers crossed into US
WHO: Peigan 1st Nations, AB provincial gov’t
WHEN: proposed 1980, court cases 90’s-2000
WHY: Led to the est. of the CEAA and the EARP Guidelines Order

31
Q

EARP Guidelines Order

A

Made EA legally binding

32
Q

Voisey’s Bay Mine

A

WHY: Canada’s 1st “sustainability assessment” set standard for projects, suggested projects should reduce impacts AND contribute something positive to the area
WHAT: huge copper, cobalt and nickel mine
WHEN: discovered 1993, propsed 1995, mining began 2005, still operational
WHO: INCO, prov. and fed. gov’t, Innu 1st Nations
WHERE: Labrador & Newfoundland

33
Q

Red Hill Creek Expressway

A

WHAT: Large infrastructural project – Bypass highway
WHERE: Hamilton, southern ON, in the middle of a large nature corridor – important area for wildlife
WHO: Provincial gov’t, multiple 1st nations, 100+ university professors
WHEN: First proposed in 1956, brought back in the 80’s, construction began in late 90’s
WHY IMPORTANT: Proponent argued that EA was not required because the project had started before the act was enforced (& in the end didn’t have to go thru an EA) because of “grandfather loophole”, led to the removal of this loophole

34
Q

Triggers of EA’s

A 
Energy thresholds
Size
Production thresholds
Transboundary impacts
Wildlife habitat impacts
35
Q

Projects that are under different jursdictions and not required to have an EA

A

Exploratory drilling
Seismic lines
Residential land development

36
Q

Compliance reports

A

Created in the 90’s b/c some projects ere not following conditions
Small penalty fro not reporting but larger penalty for mis-reporting

37
Q

Policy-based VS. Legislative

A

Policy-based: conditions after approval not legally binding

Legislative: conditions after approval are legally binding

38
Q

Step 1

A

Project is proposed and determined”reviewable”

First Nation Consultation begins

39
Q

Step 2

A

Scope and process determined

40
Q

Step 3

A

Application Information Requirements
-info gathered
Public comment period
Compliance management begins here

41
Q

Step 4

A

Application evaluated for completeness

30 days to complete the evaluation

42
Q

Step 5

A

Application reviewed by EAO

Public comment period

43
Q

Step 6

A

Assessment report written
-recommendations
-conditions
First Nation Consultation ends

44
Q

Step 7

A

Report given to Ministers

They have 45 days to make decision

45
Q

Step 8

A

Decision made
Ministers can consider any other public input in their decision
IF APPROVED: Certificate issued with conditions & monitoring and compliance begins
IF NOT APPROVED: Further assessment is required OR project stopped completely

46
Q

VC’s

A

Valued Components

47
Q

Gibson

A

“Sustainability means to not only minimize impacts on the environment but to optimize contributions to sustainability”
“Old sustainability” : considering the interrelationships among important concerns and influences, and looking beyond immediate results to implications for future generations
“New sustainability” : providing decent lives for all without wrecking the planet

353 (12 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions