Decision-making Flashcards
3 ways families make decisions
- Accommodation: when you go along with something you’re not super excited about because you know the other person is really excited about
- Consensus: everyone agrees – socially desirable
- De facto – lack of dissent, nobody really cares about outcome so one person makes a suggestion and you go with it
what determines a couple’s decision-making influence?
- Emotional interdependence – ability to control each other and influence consensus
- Commitment to the relationship (husbands respond to wives suggestions)
- How close to each other the couple are
- Degree of cooperativeness and communication between them
- Level of education
decision-making: complex vs. simple, automatic vs. syncratic
- Complex or simple
- Syncratic: husband, wife share equally
- Automatic: spouses make equal number of decisions independently
types of power considered most relevant for influencing decisions
- Expertise
- Legitimate
- Referent or attraction: might want to identify with that person -> ie. Pleasing someone
- Reward
- Coercive – when you’re pressured into doing things the child wants
how can children influence us?
- Active social power (ie. Direct ask, persistence)
- Passive social power: parents already know what you want
- Decision history: which power have you reinforced in the past?
- Preference intensity: what’s important to them? They’ll use multiple strategies if needed
direct ask
- very common and most effective strategy for kids to get what they want (unless it’s overused)
- Ex. Me asking for one thing I really wanted when I was little
social power used by 8-11 year-olds when buying toys
- Expert: kids showed knowledge about toys; used expertise about it to make parent listen
- Referent: select product that parents approved
- Reward: show affection, ask nicely, just ask, bargain
- Coercive: anger, beg, con
other findings from the 8-11 year-old toy study
- Mothers felt child had legitimate and expert powers – why? Not their money
- Didn’t attribute passive referent, reward, or coercive power to their child
- Decision history of successes built confidence for future successful influence
- Strong preference: viewed self as more influential
resource theory
- Financial
- Knowledge
- Ability
relative investment theory
- Product importance
- Use of product
teen influence
- Teens have influence
- Teens overstate influence
- Mother and father agree on teen’s influence
influence strategies used most often by teens
- Bargaining
- Money deals
- Other deals
- Reasoning - Persuasion
- Opinionates
- Begging
adolescents’ most effective strategies (according to them, moms, and dads)
- Adolescent’s view: Money deals, reasoning, direct ask
- Mother’s view: Reasoning, other deals, reasonable request
- Father’s view: Reasoning, other deals, direct ask
adolescents’ least effective strategies (according to them, moms, and dads)
- Adolescents: Begging, “everyone else”, anger
- Mother’s view: Whining, “everyone else”, anger
- Father’s view: Begging, anger, whining, demands
Chinese vs. Causasian Canadian teens’ influence on purchases
- No difference for more expensive durable products
- Chinese Canadians teens had greater influence than parents on convenience products