CP Adds Flashcards
LAND
1) State 1st test land developer faces.
- –
2) What must he do if he fails the test?
LAND
1) Is is proposed use compatible w/ CP?
- –
2) Amend CP.
Define LOS.
LAND ----------- unit it has to give, unit they demand ----------- Level of Service Std = unit capacity to unit demand
LAND ----------- State the 3-part test a rezoning request must meet. --- If it passes, what is next test?
LAND ----------- 1. In the public’s interest, 2. Consistent w/ CP & 3. Compatible w/ surrounding uses. --- 1. Do we need to enter into a dev agmt? (a) Is the road in the cap impr PLAN. (b) If not, need to amend CP. --- 2. Address concurrency. (a) How does this impact LOS? (b) the government’s demand for property from a land-use permit applicant must satisfy the requirements of Nollan and Dolan even when the government denies the permit and even when its demand is for money.”
LAND ----------- State the 2 step analysis of wh/ Parties need to enter a Dev. Agmt (ex. one builds a road for a desirable subdivision?). --- STEP #1: What is it dependent upon? --- STEP #2: If met, what is step #2?
1) Look to see if in capital improvement PLAN (part of cap imp ELE).
—
2) Address concurrency.
(a) What is the traffic impact of a development.
(b) How will it effect the LOS?
—
For roads, the LOS will fail b/c of this proposed request. In order to proceed we’ll need to amend the CP & enter a developer’s agreement.
Capital Improvement Plan is part of what?
A piece of the capital improvement element. Every LG has to have a capital improvement plan. Any road is in the capital improvement plan. Why? b/c you need to have agreed w/ the public that general operating funds wd be spent on this road during the life of the plan.
Address concurrency. What is the traffic impact of a development. How will it effect the LOS? For roads, the LOS will fail b/c of this proposed request. In order to proceed we’ll need to amend the CP & enter a developer’s agreement.
Why wd all roads be reflected in the capital improvement PLAN?
To agree w/ the public that general operating funds wd be spent on this road during the life of the plan.
Address concurrency. What is the traffic impact of a development. How will it effect the LOS? For roads, the LOS will fail b/c of this proposed request. In order to proceed we’ll need to amend the CP & enter a developer’s agreement.
Does every LG have to have a capital improvement PLAN?
Yes.
What do you say when your LG has proposed crazy exactions to Applicant Developer?
LAND ----------- LG’s demands upon a land-use permit applicant- (1) must satisfy the requirements of Nollan and Dolan i.e. nexus (2) even when LG denies the permit & (3) even when its demand is for money. ----------- Koontz
What 7 items are excluded from the standard Expedited State Review Process?
LAND ----------- 1) Small scale [163.3187 + 288.0656] 2) Area of critical State concern. 3) Propose a rural land stewardship. 4) Propose a Sector Plan. 5) Propose an amendment to a Sector P. 6) Creates a municipality. 7) Propose a development that is subj to State Coordinated Review Process. ----------- ~FS 163.3184(4)
Re: State Coordinated Review Process.
State LG timeline to kick off.
LG TO Reviewing Agencies:
10 days aft PH transmit to Rvwing Agencies.
Re: State Coordinated Review Process.
State Reviewing Agencies timeline.
30 days Rvwing Ag gives comments to SLP.
Re: State Coordinated Review Process.
State SLP’s timeline.
LAND ----------- Has 60 days to issue ORC. --- then --- Has 45 days to issue NOI.
LAND ----------- What is an ORC? When is it issued? By who?
LAND ----------- Objections, Recommendations & Comments issued by SLPA 30 days after receiving proposed State Coordinated Review Process. ----------- 1) Area of critical State concern. 2) Propose a rural land stewardship. 3) Propose a Sector Plan. 4) Propose an amendment to a Sector P. 5) Creates a municipality. 6) Propose a development that is subj to State Coordinated Review Process. ----------- ~FS 163.3184(4)
What 4 things are contained in the ORC?
Re: State Coord. Rvw Process
1) Wh/ the plan complies w/ Ch. 163.
2) Wh/ it will adversely impact important state resources.
3) If so, how to mitigate.
4) May comment on densities + intensities.
What is LG’s timeline to finish State Coordinated Review Process?
1) TRANSMITTAL:
Give SLPA 60 days to issue ORC, if it chooses to review.
2) ADOPTION:
Give SLPA 45 days to issue NOI.
LAND ----------- What is LG's deadline to hold 2nd PH in: 1) State Coordinated Rvw Process. 2) Expedited State Rvw.
LAND
1) State Coord. 180 days
2) Expedited. _____ days.
LAND ----------- Expedited State Review Process. --- State 11 steps.
1) LPA preps CP amdmt.
2) Transmittal PH.
3) w/i 10 days - Transmit to SLPA & reviewing agencies.
4) Deem complete.
5) Rvwing Agencies rvw upon request of (a) LG, (b) regional planning council or (c) affected person.
6) State agencies comment only important state resources that may be adversely impacted.
7) Adopt PH - adopt w/ or w/o changes or determine it will not adopt the changes.
8) LG can require super maj but cannot permit public rt to approve or repeal CP amendments.
9) Send to SPA.
10) SPA deems complete.
11) Effective 31st day, unless challenged.
State the single difference b/w Expedited & State Coordinated re:
REVIEWING AGENCIES’ COMMENTS.
EXPEDITED Rvwing Agencies rvw upon request of: (1) LG (2) Regional planning council or (3) Affected person. ----------- vs. COORDINATED Rvwing agencies MAY give comment to SLPA.
State the single difference b/w Expedited & State Coordinated re:
SLPA COMMENTS/ISSUES WHAT?
EXPEDITED
State agencies shall only comment on important state resources that may be adversely impacted.
———–
vs.
COORDINATED
State issues ORC [aft transmittal if State chooses to review] + NOI [aft adoption[.
In Expedited, what 3 categories of folks can request that Reviewing Agencies review?
LAND ----------- EXPEDITED Rvwing Agencies rvw upon request of: (1) LG (2) Regional planning council or (3) Affected person.
In State Coordinated Review Process, where do public comments get sent?
Go directly to LG.
—
BUT, State reviewing agencies comment to SLPA.
State the single difference b/w Expedited & Coordinated re:
* LG’s ability to adopt or reject in whole or in part.
LAND ----------- EXPEDITED: Adopt w/ or w/o changes or determine it will not adopt the changes. ----------- COORDINATED: STRICTER - Adopt changed or reject.
LAND
Re: State Coordinated:
What are the 2 items to know, as to who locally has power to approve/reject?
LAND
CAN - Require super maj
CANNOT - permit publc rt to approve or repeal CP amendments.
LAND ----------- LG has adopted a Sector Plan or other under State Coordinated Review Process. --- What are final steps by SLPA?
LAND
1) SLPA has 45 days to determine if complies w/ 163.
2) Issues Notice of Intent on SLPA website (not newspaper).
3) Effective upon Notice of Intent unless challenged.
State the differences b/w Expedited State Rvw & Coord. State Rvw after adoption PH.
Hint:
Expedited = 4 steps.
vs.
Coord = 6 steps.
EXPEDITED: 1) Adopt w/ or w/o changes. 2) Send to SLPA. 3) Deems complete. 4) Effective 31st day. ----------- COORDINATED: 1) Schedule Adopt w/i 180 days. 2) Adopt changed or reject all. 3) Send to SLPA. 4) Deems complete. 5) 45 days to determine complies w/ 163. 6) Issues & effective upon NOI on website.
Who + where challenge a State Coordinated Review outcome?
Who: Affected persons or SLPA
Where: Files w/ DOAH.